Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2013 March 28

< March 27	March 29 >

March 28

File:1970 Atlanta Pop Festival program.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep; this historically interesting document is already tagged as move-to-the-Commons. Dianna (talk) 01:13, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, can't see use :Jay8g^{Inspect-Berate-Know} _{WASH-BRIDGE-WPWA-MFIC} 03:16, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe Commons? - This is for Atlanta International Pop Festival (1970) and formerly used in that article. It it arguably a pretty interesting piece to have if you're interested in such things. I know that some of the conferences and events that I go to, seeing old memorabilia like this is pretty neat. --B (talk) 00:23, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Amazing Aloha.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, low resolution. Kelly ^hi! 03:19, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

delete if the image you cannot prove, you must remove, to paraphrase a lawyer.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 03:27, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Blackforrestdonuts.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, low resolution. Kelly ^hi! 03:25, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep could be used, as we probably dont have a shot of this variety. not that poor quality, i can see they are donuts and am not annoyed by the artifacts.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 03:28, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:1998 Grand Marquis LS (rear view).jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, low quality :Jay8g^{Inspect-Berate-Know} _{WASH-BRIDGE-WPWA-MFIC} 03:59, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

delete trivial to get a better image, not a rare item.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 03:29, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Cheese curds 1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Low quality. Kelly ^hi! 04:07, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, if the image you cannot prove, you must remove, to paraphrase a lawyer.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 03:25, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Cheese curds 3.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Low quality. Kelly ^hi! 04:10, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

delete if the image you cannot prove, you must remove, to paraphrase a lawyer.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 03:26, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Steve Dunham.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned self-pic B (talk) 04:17, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

delete useless as a generic image of a male face.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 03:31, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:BiharDistricts.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned low quality map with obviously bogus license (though it's likely ineligible for copyright in the US, as recent discussions on maps have shown). Still, though, File:BiharDistricts.svg is much better. B (talk) 04:24, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:JamalpurLocationPolitical.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Map used in Jamalpur, Munger with obviously bogus license. It's possibly ineligible for copyright, but the article has a very nice high-quality locator map, so this one is rather redundant ... and not of spectacular quality. B (talk) 04:26, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Masters-50+-05.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, no apparent encyclopedic use, and a nice big copyright notice built into the image. B (talk) 04:29, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

delete, no prejudice against uploading again in 2101:).Mercurywoodrose (talk) 03:33, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Masters-50+BLOCK-08.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, no apparent encyclopedic use, and a nice big copyright notice built into the image. B (talk) 04:29, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

delete, no prejudice against uploading again in 2101:)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Headbuster1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep, I have tagged for move to the Commons. Dianna (talk) 01:28, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, uploaded for deleted article with no other encyclopedic use. B (talk) 04:35, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep i can see it used for an article on haberdashery or retail display, so may have some encyc use.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 03:35, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Upper New 4.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, uploaded for deleted article Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ACE Adventure Resort, too small to be of use B (talk) 04:39, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

delete, if a little bigger, might be useable or encyc.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 03:37, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Red raft.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep. Dianna (talk) 01:35, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, uploaded for deleted article Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ACE Adventure Resort, too small to be of use B (talk) 04:39, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Move to commons can be used in rafting articles. -- 65.92.180.137 (talk) 06:32, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Move to commons a usable image for rafting and river sports articles. Northamerica1000^(talk) 17:28, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
move to commons, potentially useful, as its a clear shot of raft usage.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 03:38, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Guide tipping.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep. Dianna (talk) 01:40, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, uploaded for deleted article Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ACE Adventure Resort, too small to be of use B (talk) 04:39, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Move to commons can be used for canoeing articles -- 65.92.180.137 (talk) 06:33, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Chicken Tikka Masala Vah.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, low resolution. Kelly ^hi! 04:41, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Question Is User:Vahrehvah the same person as the one who uploaded a much higher resolution copy to Blogspot? The user name appears in the page URL... --Stefan2 (talk) 17:52, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
delete too small to id w/o text.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 03:38, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Chilidogbacon.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, no forseeable use. Kelly ^hi! 04:47, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Move to commons perfectly usable for someone's chilidog article. (possibly at a different language, or even in ours) -- 65.92.180.137 (talk) 06:25, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Move to commons, reasonable image, i doubt we have too many chilidog images there.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 03:39, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:CircumsizedErectPenis.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned penis picture. Kelly ^hi! 05:23, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

delete im not even going to look, this is surely a routine matter by now.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 03:40, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:CircumsizedPenis.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned penis picture. Kelly ^hi! 05:23, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:OPP;)Mercurywoodrose (talk) 03:41, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Cloverfield Monster.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned screenshot. Kelly ^hi! 05:35, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

delete cant id w/o text.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 03:41, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:CNEMagicPass.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned derivative work. Kelly ^hi! 05:37, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom, and as trivia assoc with event.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 03:45, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Coffee Mate.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete per strong policy-based arguments of Stefan2 and B. Dianna (talk) 13:37, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

We don't need copyrighted product packaging to demonstrate the idea of Non-dairy creamer. Kelly ^hi! 05:49, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I'm surprised we don't have a Coffee Mate article... -- 65.92.180.137 (talk) 06:22, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I'm both the uploader and creator of the photo. Coffee Mate brand "non dairy" creamer is mentioned in the article as an easily dissolved product developed about 6 years after the first commercial powdered creamer ("Pream"). It makes sense to illustrate the article with an image of a subject of the article. In addition, imagination fails me when trying to think of a way to illustrate the subject matter absent a depiction which includes both the product (a white powder) and its packaging. I favor illustrations for articles as a way to add impact and comprehension. In this case, I see the depiction of the packaging under Fair Use as appropriate. Geoff ^{Who, me?} 17:39, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep actually, we do need a commercial product, as the generic product w/o packaging is just a white powdery substance, which i believe is a common form in our industrial world.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 03:48, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - As stated by others, plus this is possibly the largest non-dairy creamer brand sold in North America. It is a good example of the subject of the article. --Jeremy (blah blah • I did it!) 20:00, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Violates WP:NFCC#8. The image is about a special kind of substance, so we only need photos of that substance and not photos of product packaging. For the same reason, the articles Potato and Tomato only show food and not food packaging. If you want beverages, compare with Tieguanyin or Oolong. --Stefan2 (talk) 10:42, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Is there not a single non-dairy creamer in existence that uses a packaging that does not pass the threshold of originality? Was there never an advertisement for a non-dairy creamer published prior to 1978 without a copyright notice? In 30 seconds of googling, I found this non-dairy creamer. The packaging itself is PD-ineligible, so you can photograph it to your heart's content. For that matter, we could even use the coffee mate if the use were more de minimis. --B (talk) 19:29, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Does product packaging usually contain a copyright notice in the United States? If not, you could maybe even find some pre-1978 packaging to take a photo of. --Stefan2 (talk) 20:04, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  - All new on the next episode of Hoarders ... ;) --B (talk) 20:16, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ComedyMail.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned ad. Kelly ^hi! 05:54, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

delete per nom. nuff said.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 03:48, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Crass logo.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons. Please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:08, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

CV Savage Pink (talk) 09:55, 28 March 2013 (UTC) I am the representative of the copyright holder and will provide documentation of our copyright upon request from Wikipedia staff.[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Stepas Butautas.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Player on the picture is not Stepas Butautas. This is Valdemaras Chomičius (as anyone with at least passing interest in basketball would tell you).--Wurzel91 (talk) 10:44, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, a quick google image search for Valdemaras Chomičius shows that our friend here is he. (I don't know that this is intuitive to anyone with a passing interest in basketball - I love college basketball, but have never heard of either of these people.) --B (talk) 16:52, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Soup served in Rajdhani express.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, blurry. Kelly ^hi! 15:12, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

delete obviously train/plane food, but we dont know more than that, too generic, too blurry.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 03:50, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Miss Independent music video.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete The caption to the image mentions shooing and although this can be implied in the arm movement, it's not discussed in the article text either in the section on the video, or in the section on the composition, or the supporting citation as to how this fits in with the storyline of the lyrics. Therefore fails WP:NFCC#8 as it doesn't significantly increase the reader's understanding. NtheP (talk) 13:25, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Procedural nomination - this image was tagged with {{di-disputed fair use rationale}} with the concern, "It's just her with her mouth open. There's no automatic entitlement to screenshots, and it is not clear what this is adding." Rather than simply deleting it, I wanted to bring it here because it is worthy of consideration - the scene depicted in this image is discussed in prose - it's not purely decorative. Whether or not it substantially increases a user's understanding and the user's understanding would be impaired without the image is disputable. B (talk) 15:18, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The comment on the file talk page may be relevant. — This, that and the other (talk) 10:11, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The music video scene is discussed in the prose and it substanitally increases the user's understanding that would be impaired without it. Aspects (talk) 04:48, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Polimitas etc 050.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned product image. Kelly ^hi! 15:21, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

delete too bad its not released by company under a license, it could be used to illustrate Idiocy or Gullibility.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 03:56, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Popeyes chicken.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, low quality. Kelly ^hi! 15:36, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom or move to Drunkopedia.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 03:59, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Poutinevachon.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, low resolution, ambiguous source. Kelly ^hi! 16:17, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Pud horizontal.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, unidentified subject. Kelly ^hi! 17:09, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment if you read the label, it says black pudding, so why is it "unidentified"? -- 65.92.180.137 (talk) 06:50, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Not only is it identified, but it's likely a copyright violation. http://www.bestbeef.co.uk/ has a rotated version of this image. It's smaller, but it's the identical angle on the label. I'm betting $eleventy billion that this is a promotional photo of the product, not something the user created. --B (talk) 13:22, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
delete not identifiable enough to work as an example of a commercial packaging of the product.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 03:51, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Pulque.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, low quality. Kelly ^hi! 17:12, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:PunyKiddo.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned personal photo. Kelly ^hi! 17:14, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:PurpleOrange.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Low quality image used only for an old reference desk question. Kelly ^hi! 17:19, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Pusdc.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, low resolution. Kelly ^hi! 17:20, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Move to commons -- 65.92.180.137 (talk) 06:16, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Puttanesca.PNG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep; it's not art, but meh. Dianna (talk) 01:56, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, low quality compared to File:Spaghettiniphoto.jpg, a photo of the same dish. Kelly ^hi! 17:22, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Move to commons this is a different pasta. Having different pastas to compare will emphasize the sauce and deemphasize the pasta. -- 65.92.180.137 (talk) 06:11, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
If we cropped out the irrelevant elements (serving container you can't see what's in it, lemon juice, etc), we might be able to make it into a less useless photo ... but it's really too small to be useful. Yes, it's a completely different pasta and the two photos don't look anything alike, but no, I don't think it's worth saving unless it's our only one of this kind. --B (talk) 18:26, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- It's better than thumbnail/gallery view quality, so it's not too small. And the entire point is to have many different representation of the sauce, to emphasize the sauce and deemphasize the different pastas it coats. -- 65.92.180.137 (talk) 02:31, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  - So move it to Commons if you think it should be there. Kelly ^hi! 04:00, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    - My proposal at Commons for a version of WP:IFU has not yet passed, so I cannot personally do that. -- 65.92.180.137 (talk) 04:20, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
      - Or you could register for an account ... --B (talk) 19:45, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Pyaari.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned personal photo. Kelly ^hi! 17:23, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Beautiful corinna-1.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned personal photo. Kelly ^hi! 17:48, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Beloved sylvia.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned personal photo. Kelly ^hi! 17:59, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment If you can just identify the species, I think that this would be in scope on Commons (under a better name, of course). --Stefan2 (talk) 17:39, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ben Freeman.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned personal photo. Kelly ^hi! 18:02, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Benthomasfinnegan.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned personal photo. Kelly ^hi! 18:08, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:BethGrant.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, likely nonfree. Kelly ^hi! 18:15, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Betina Gonzalez.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned personal photo. Kelly ^hi! 18:16, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bettney-150x150.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned personal photo. Kelly ^hi! 18:16, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Beyonceasachild .jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, likely nonfree. Kelly ^hi! 18:17, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Big Red.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned personal photo. Kelly ^hi! 18:22, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bigjames.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned personal photo. Kelly ^hi! 18:23, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bindu2Lx.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned personal photo. Kelly ^hi! 18:33, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bingo dabber.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned product image. Kelly ^hi! 18:34, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Binkasmelli.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned personal photo. Kelly ^hi! 18:35, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Biokleen.jpeg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned product image. Kelly ^hi! 18:36, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Black-buster-flier(web).jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned ad. Kelly ^hi! 19:07, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Black-dress.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned personal photo. Kelly ^hi! 19:07, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:BlackFemale human buttocks.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, low quality. Kelly ^hi! 19:08, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Manginasalmeal.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, unidentified subject. Kelly ^hi! 19:16, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment this has already been moved to commons -- 65.92.180.137 (talk) 06:46, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Blackwoman.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, unencyclopedic. Kelly ^hi! 19:19, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Blocking.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned personal photo. Kelly ^hi! 19:22, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Blonde Female Showing Modest Cleavage.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, unencyclopedic. Kelly ^hi! 19:23, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bloody devil (drink).jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, watermarked image. Kelly ^hi! 19:24, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Blowjob 01.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep. Dianna (talk) 02:05, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, no forseeable use. Kelly ^hi! 19:25, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment we have an article on blowjob, so I don't see how you can say there's no forseeable use. -- 65.92.180.137 (talk) 02:29, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Blue Sky Cola.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned product image. Kelly ^hi! 19:27, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Body piercing Scrotum2.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Another orphaned genitalia picture. Kelly ^hi! 19:31, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:DeathProofPic.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free image of and used in a BLP. Free images of this person exist, see File:Zoë Bell 07.jpg Courcelles 20:01, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:The Voice logo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

We already have the show's title card in the infobox, so wouldn't this additional usage of the logo violate the minimal usage policy? WikiRedactor (talk) 21:18, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Leslie Finer.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by INeverCry (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Newspaper photo[1] so possibly violates WP:NFCC#2 and WP:NFC#UUI §7, unless this is something that his relatives provided to the newspaper only for the purpose of publishing this statement. Stefan2 (talk) 21:37, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Please close this. I requested a speedy deletion of the file. Δρ.Κ. ^{λόγοςπράξις} 21:41, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Preservation Hall Jazz Band, Portrait at Preservation Hall 2012.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F7 by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:14, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Image fails WP:NFCC#1. Since the band is still active, a free photo could be taken at a concert, event, etc. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 21:58, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:The Twilight Zone 1985.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep for one article: The Twilight Zone (1985 TV series). Dianna (talk) 13:45, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Superfluous to File:TheTwilightZoneLogo.png. Two versions of the show's logo are not necessary to understand the topic or for inclusion within the television infobox. AldezD (talk) 14:44, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not a valid reason for deletion of valid image. Deleting image would remove it from The Twilight Zone (1985 TV series). --Musdan77 (talk) 18:03, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Per WP:NFCC#3a, there should not be two images in the article The Twilight Zone, and for that reason, one of the logos should be removed from that article. On the other hand, the articles with years in the title may be different. --Stefan2 (talk) 19:10, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Doesn't pertain to issue of deletion of image. And reference given doesn't apply to the article. But it doesn't matter now that original petitioner has edited it. Issue resolved. --Musdan77 (talk) 19:40, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, B (talk) 22:19, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted from March 20 after my close was objected to. There is, apparently, unanimous agreement that the use on The Twilight Zone (1985 TV series) is acceptable, but further consensus is needed on whether the updated use on The Twilight Zone (franchise) is acceptable. --B (talk) 22:19, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Although I don't think it's absolutely necessary, I think it's helpful to see the difference between the 1959 series and the 1985 series logos (the 2003 logo used to be on the article, but I don't remember why it was removed some time ago). --Musdan77 (talk) 22:43, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Almost identical to the original logo, so looks redundant to that one in The Twilight Zone (franchise) and thus fails WP:NFCC#3a. Looks like valid fair use in The Twilight Zone (1985 TV series). --Stefan2 (talk) 00:02, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bradtrammell.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned personal photo. Kelly ^hi! 22:38, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:BrasilRepresent.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned personal photo. Kelly ^hi! 22:44, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Brenda 3.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned personal photo. Kelly ^hi! 23:06, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bresse chicken 1.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, unidentified subject. Kelly ^hi! 23:08, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

See Special:PermanentLink/151982595. I guess it shows a meal that someone had at that restaurant. Consider clicking on the "this link" link in the {{orphan image}} template. It shows the first edits the uploader made after uploading the image, which usually was to add the image to an article. --Stefan2 (talk) 23:17, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, thanks. Moved to Commons. Kelly ^hi! 23:30, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Brigitte dale.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned personal photo. Kelly ^hi! 23:14, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:BulmersYouth.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned personal photo. Kelly ^hi! 23:51, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Burgbaconpizza.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Ewww, i mean, Keep. Dianna (talk) 02:18, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned pizza picture, no forseeable use. Kelly ^hi! 23:53, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Move to commons it is certainly a very different pizza from the regular ones. -- 65.92.180.137 (talk) 06:06, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Burkholder.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned personal photo. Kelly ^hi! 23:54, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2013 March 28

March 28

Navigation menu

Search