Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2013 March 27

< March 26	March 28 >

March 27

File:Rumors - CD Cover.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:13, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned album cover. Kelly ^hi! 00:03, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ruslogo3.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:13, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned logo. Kelly ^hi! 00:04, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Russian Doll.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:13, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned derivative work. Kelly ^hi! 00:05, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Russian matryoshka doll ornament set.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:13, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned derivative work. Kelly ^hi! 00:05, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sam murray.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:13, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, unencyclopedic. Kelly ^hi! 00:27, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Samples 137.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:13, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned derivative work. Kelly ^hi! 00:29, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Espace Léopold under construction.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:08, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A non-free photo of the building doesn't increase the understanding of the topic, so the image violates WP:NFCC#8. A freely licensed photo (uploaded locally and tagged with {{FoP-USonly}}) of the completed building would serve the same purpose. Stefan2 (talk) 01:02, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This photo illustrates the construction process, which is not repeatable. It shows the surroundings of the building prior to its transformation as described in the text: "The project was built on an old brewery and marshalling yard including the covering of the Luxembourg railway station to form a pedestrian area." So, removing this non-replaceable image prevents understanding how was the terrain described in the text prior to its construction, and is thus consistent with WP:NFCC#8 and WP:NFCC#1; a current image does not serve the same purpose. Diego (talk) 06:33, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: The old brewery and marshalling yard are not shown in the photo, as the construction process is too far along. It tells us nothing about the terrain, either, as the shot is from a kilometre away. Besides, these points are already adequately covered in the prose. -- Dianna (talk) 18:35, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sasha lying on sofa.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep. Dianna (talk) 18:41, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, unencyclopedic. Kelly ^hi! 01:13, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment It is in use in Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/T. H. Cayne (a declined AfC submission). --Stefan2 (talk) 01:18, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Move to commons released artwork -- 65.92.180.137 (talk) 05:07, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sbsmoothie.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:13, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, low resolution. Kelly ^hi! 01:16, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Schwartz with Larry King.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:13, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned screenshot. Kelly ^hi! 01:17, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:SCMC ShoreisMagic(2007) Poster1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:13, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned poster. Kelly ^hi! 01:18, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Scottwilcox.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:13, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned userphoto. Kelly ^hi! 01:20, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Shawarma Sandwich.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Dianna (talk) 01:37, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, low quality. Kelly ^hi! 03:26, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Move to commons seems usable enough. -- 65.92.180.137 (talk) 05:02, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Shawarmajordan.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep. Dianna (talk) 01:39, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, low quality. Kelly ^hi! 03:27, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Move to commons seems usable enough. -- 65.92.180.137 (talk) 05:02, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:TheWalkingDeadSeed.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:04, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Just a couple of people standing on asphalt. Seems to violate WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 (talk) 13:01, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Eggess.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, low quality. Kelly ^hi! 16:10, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Uploader Delete No issues with this deletion. I had forgotten about this product of my (relative) youth. I find it embarrassing. Samuell ^{Lift me up} or _{put me down} 03:45, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Eggfett2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, low resolution, unidentified subject. Kelly ^hi! 16:11, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Copyright violation --Stefan2 (talk) 16:15, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Electrik kandy.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned ad. Kelly ^hi! 16:17, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ellaredskin.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, unencyclopedic. Kelly ^hi! 16:18, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Move to commons sunburn image -- 65.92.180.137 (talk) 01:03, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Empadinha.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, low resolution. Kelly ^hi! 16:22, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Entrapment-higher.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free movie still. Kelly ^hi! 16:27, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Erotic photography 24.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, unencyclopedic. Kelly ^hi! 16:29, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note that the file has been overwritten and that there are two images under the same file name. Google thinks that this is from 2006 (but the links from Google's search result don't work properly), so the photo of a woman on a bike is presumably a copyright violation. --Stefan2 (talk) 18:16, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Estremeexposefansite.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, unencyclopedic. Kelly ^hi! 16:32, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:SterlingRubyMOCASupermax.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Deleted; the metadata shows the photo was taken by Robert Wedemeyer, and we have no evidence that that's who uploaded it; the image is tagged as non-free, but there's no rationale for inclusion provided; and there's no reason the sculpture could not be described using prose alone. Dianna (talk) 14:07, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No evidence given that uploader is copyright holder. Artiquities (talk) 16:45, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No reason to doubt it either. The image should be tagged as being under freedom of panorama, though, as it was taken in a museum. Diego (talk) 17:14, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The museum seems to be in the United States and there is no freedom of panorama inside museums in the United States. Consider changing to a dual copyright tag using {{Photo of art}} (unless it violates WP:NFCC – I didn't bother checking). --Stefan2 (talk) 18:09, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Fedora hat.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, low resolution. Kelly ^hi! 16:47, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Move to commons it is larger than the typical thumbnail, so is usable -- 65.92.180.137 (talk) 00:59, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and move to Commons per 65.92.180.137. --NaBUru38 (talk) 17:36, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Fenway Frank.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, low quality. Kelly ^hi! 16:48, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Move to commons -- 65.92.180.137 (talk) 00:55, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Move to commons AutomaticStrikeout (T • C • AAPT) 01:07, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Poor quality, I can't see how this picture can be used to faithfully represent what it's supposed to represent. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:20, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Fisch copy.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, unencyclopedic. Kelly ^hi! 16:53, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Food box shaped eraser.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, possibly nonfree derivative work. Kelly ^hi! 17:02, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Copyvio per Commons:User:Elcobbola/Models. It's not real food. Note the text on the packaging: Lunchbox eraser (ランチＢＯXケシゴム, Ranchi bokkusu keshigomu). --Stefan2 (talk) 18:35, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Foodguatita.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, identified subject. Kelly ^hi! 17:05, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I assume you mean unidentified subject. --Stefan2 (talk) 18:36, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I assume this would be guatita, as that article is missing a photo, it can be used there. -- 65.92.180.137 (talk) 00:52, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
~~Move to commons~~ -- 65.92.180.137 (talk) 00:52, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- copyvio -- 65.92.180.137 (talk) 02:14, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Move to Commons Cambalachero (talk) 00:57, 28 March 2013 (UTC) Delete Cambalachero (talk) 01:16, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Copyright violation from http://wayback.archive.org/web/20041022012434/http://rodbond.com/SanJose.html (click on "tradional food"). --Stefan2 (talk) 01:11, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Djblackberry.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F5 by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#1 as subject is still alive and accessible, a free photo could replace this one. Uploader may be owner of copyright, if so they are welcome to release the photo under a free license. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 17:09, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The fair use rationale is for an article which was speedily deleted, so the image is probably not useful even with a free licence. --Stefan2 (talk) 18:38, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Foreskin Closeup.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned penis picture. Kelly ^hi! 17:09, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Foton-0008.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned picture of a pizza. We have many better ones on Commons. Kelly ^hi! 17:10, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment It says "Photographer: Dazed" but the uploader is called Astobasto. Is the photographer someone other than the uploader? --Stefan2 (talk) 18:39, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Frenulum breve.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned penis picture. Kelly ^hi! 17:19, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Amanda Lear - Tam-Tam-Secret Passion (Russia).jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:04, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image is unnecessary. There are already covers of Tam-Tam and Secret Passion. Also, the uploader is inactive since 2009. George Ho (talk) 19:47, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that the image violates WP:NFCC#3a, but the uploader's recent inactivity is irrelevant when determining if the image should be deleted or not. --Stefan2 (talk) 20:27, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I just wanted to ask an uploader, as always. --George Ho (talk) 14:55, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Anis Hamadeh 32.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons. Please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:12, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Article about this person was deleted, most probably he was too unimportant for wikipedia, but his picture was not deleted. The picture is not used anywhere. 82.131.35.100 (talk) 21:11, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Don, Pete, and Roger look at Lane's hanging corpse.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:04, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Seemingly random photo of four people standing in a room. Violates WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 (talk) 22:33, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment a better screenshot can be made, such as when the take down the corpse, instead of looking at the corpse's ear, and the three men that will soon take it down. -- 65.92.180.137 (talk) 00:44, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Perhaps you should read the rest of the article for context before judging this image of four men paralyzed in unique terror at the sight of a corpse as a "seemingly random photo of four people standing in a room"? Penny Lane's America (talk) 03:35, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  - The problem is that WP:NFCC#8 only permits screenshots of television series episodes if removal of the image would be detrimental to the understanding of the article. A photo of a few people standing in a room doesn't affect the understanding of the article, so such images are not allowed. I suggest that you read the documentation about the image parameter for the infobox you're using in the article:

“

An image, if needed. Should be resized to a width of 250 pixels or less. Remember, virtually all TV screenshots are copyrighted, they must be uploaded in a low resolution, and be accompanied by a fair use rationale. There is no blanket allowance for an image per episode. A non-free screenshot should only be used if it meets the Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria, i.e. typically if it is required to illustrate a crucial element of the episode that is the object of explicit, sourced analytical commentary and where that commentary is in need of visual support to be understood.

”

In this case, an image isn't needed, so the article shouldn't have an image in the infobox. --Stefan2 (talk) 13:55, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Talked About Scene from Mad Men 'Mystery Date' - Don post-murder.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:04, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Seemingly random photo of a man in a bed with a leg on the floor. Violates WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 (talk) 22:37, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment there are better scenes that are more representative of this episode that could be screencapped -- 65.92.180.137 (talk) 00:42, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- All in the original purpose of use. The style of the visual is completely different from the show's usual tone. It recalls the images of an actual murder described in the article. Penny Lane's America (talk) 03:26, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  - The problem is that WP:NFCC#8 only permits screenshots of television series episodes if removal of the image would be detrimental to the understanding of the article. A photo of a man in a bed with a leg on the floor doesn't affect the understanding of the article, so this image is not allowed. I suggest that you read the documentation about the image parameter for the infobox you're using in the article:

“

An image, if needed. Should be resized to a width of 250 pixels or less. Remember, virtually all TV screenshots are copyrighted, they must be uploaded in a low resolution, and be accompanied by a fair use rationale. There is no blanket allowance for an image per episode. A non-free screenshot should only be used if it meets the Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria, i.e. typically if it is required to illustrate a crucial element of the episode that is the object of explicit, sourced analytical commentary and where that commentary is in need of visual support to be understood.

”

In this case, an image isn't needed, so the article shouldn't have an image in the infobox. --Stefan2 (talk) 13:56, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Roger Sterling from Mad Men.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:04, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Seemingly random picture of two men looking at each other. Violates WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 (talk) 22:41, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment there are better scenes to screencap from this episode that are more representative than this image. -- 65.92.180.137 (talk) 00:40, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Please. Have you even seen the episode or familiar with the content of the page or image you're attempting to delete? This main character is looking into a mirror while on acid and seeing both a young and old version of himself. It is a stylistic departure from the series that cannot be sufficiently shown with text. It is not a "seemingly random photo of two people looking at each other". I state this in the original purpose of use also. This is just ignorance. Penny Lane's America (talk) 03:23, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  - The problem is that WP:NFCC#8 only permits screenshots of television series episodes if removal of the image would be detrimental to the understanding of the article. This is just a photo of a man – any other photo of the same man would give the same understanding. In this case, the understanding is provided by going to the article Roger Sterling. --Stefan2 (talk) 13:59, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Elevator shaft scene from Mad Men.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:04, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Seemingly random image of a shaft. Violates WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 (talk) 22:43, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep scene is part of the critical commentary of the article. -- 65.92.180.137 (talk) 00:36, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- A photo of any other shaft would provide just as much information. Apart from failing WP:NFCC#8, this also fails WP:NFCC#1. --Stefan2 (talk) 00:54, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  - Scene is essential to critical commentary of the episode. Paragraphs in the production section discuss it in quite a bit of detail and static shots of the SCDP elevator shaft unique artistically to the episode. Penny Lane's America (talk) 03:36, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    - The shaft is dark (so you can barely see anything) and it looks no different from any other lift shaft. If the shaft is in an existing building, then all you need to do is to go to the same building and take a freely licensed photo. If it isn't from an existing building, then you should still be able to find similar shafts elsewhere. --Stefan2 (talk) 14:01, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Killer Smog from Mad Men.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:04, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Seemingly random image of a man in front of a window. Violates WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 (talk) 22:45, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment the smog is part of the critical commentary in the article. It's also not a random man, it's Don Draper, the central character. -- 65.92.180.137 (talk) 00:38, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The smog is already sufficiently replaced by text. See WP:NFCC#1. --Stefan2 (talk) 00:52, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  - This visual is essential to critical commentary of the episode. Penny Lane's America (talk) 03:33, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    - Smog can be just as easily represented by any other image of smog. See for example Commons:Category:Smog. --Stefan2 (talk) 14:02, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Pete, Don, Joan, Roger, and Bert in the new second floor of SCDP in "The Phantom".jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:04, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Seemingly random photo of five people standing on a floor, and you can't even tell who they are. Violates WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 (talk) 22:48, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment this iconic image was used in marketing the TV series. -- 65.92.180.137 (talk) 00:41, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- This specific shot has been mentioned in various analytical reviews of the episode as one of the standout images of the finale and cannot sufficiently be replicated by text. Penny Lane's America (talk) 03:19, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2013 March 27

March 27

Navigation menu

Search