Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kulacom Jordan

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Not much participation here, even after two relists. Let's call this a soft delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 22:21, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kulacom Jordan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Although somewhat new, I'm finding sources saying it's a leading telecommunications company but, also, my searches found no outstandingly good results and instead here, here, here, here and here. Even if it's acceptably locally notable, the current state is not entirely acceptable. Notifying the only still active tagger Stuartyeates. SwisterTwister talk 22:23, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 22:24, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 22:24, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 22:24, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dusti*Let's talk!* 00:52, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: any arabic-speaking editors who could supply the company's arabic name for searching? Most sources are likely to be in arabic. Stuartyeates (talk) 09:06, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 03:46, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - let this one go in the hopes of someone who knows Arabic getting involved. Based on that lack of involvement, and with the current searches, fails WP:GNG. Onel5969 TT me 12:47, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.