Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/George South
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. JohnCD (talk) 20:49, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- George South (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unsourced since 2007. No reliable/significant coverage found. -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 09:25, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. —-- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 09:35, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep – A very well written article. It's not worth it deleting an already developed and very well written article. It just wastes the authors time put on the content. /Heymid (talk) 19:46, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment The issue isn't whether it is wll written or not - the issue is whether reliable and independent sources can be found to verify the information in the article - and when I looked for some, I couldn't find any. Articles require references - and those that are biographies of living persons need so even more. Although I appreciate the work put into the article by the 29 editors (excluding bots) who have contributed to it, the criteria for inclusion on Wikipedia is not whether an article is well written or whether authors have put time into it - but whether it can be shown that the subject meets the notability guidelines and that the facts in the article can be verified. -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 12:27, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I've found a few sources: chapter about him, newspaper article, some more articles behind a pay wall. Probably could work those into a small article, but I don't have any intention of re-writing it. Professional wrestling is not my cup o' tea. --Joshua Scott (LiberalFascist) 23:16, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:14, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Athletes-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:30, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Meets WP:ATHLETE, as he competed regularly at the top level of his sport. Please note that I am familiar with Wikipedia policies and do not need the constant badgering that has been going on lately in wrestling biography deletion discussions. GaryColemanFan (talk) 23:05, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per GFC.--Curtis23's Usalions 18:40, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.