Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baghochi Mahaz

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. SOFTDELETE per low participation herein. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:49, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

Baghochi Mahaz

Baghochi Mahaz (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

My searches found nothing good at all and, granted this is a foreign subject so sources aren't expected to be easily available and English, but this has stayed the same since September 2007 and I'm not seeing any obvious improvement. Pinging past editors MatthewVanitas, Gilliam, Charles Matthews and Closedmouth. SwisterTwister talk 22:27, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

• Delete May be truthful as far as it goes, but very hard to document. Baghochi looks like folk etymology (Pali?). Charles Matthews (talk) 05:52, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 22:29, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 22:29, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 22:29, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 22:29, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —☮JAaron95 ^Talk 15:06, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:52, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.