This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Awards, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of awards and prizes on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AwardsWikipedia:WikiProject AwardsTemplate:WikiProject Awardsawards articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Singapore, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Singapore on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SingaporeWikipedia:WikiProject SingaporeTemplate:WikiProject SingaporeSingapore articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state) articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Higher education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of higher education, universities, and colleges on Wikipedia. Please visit the project page to join the discussion, and see the project's article guideline for useful advice.Higher educationWikipedia:WikiProject Higher educationTemplate:WikiProject Higher educationHigher education articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered.
Hi Editors, I'm Robin, here as part of my work for Beutler Ink on behalf of The Culinary Institute. I have a request to update some of the basic statistics and make a few other minor changes in the article.
I propose changing:
In the infobox
The founder parameter to "founders" and adding Frances Roth and Katharine Cramer Angell to the list of founders - Done I also revised the text. No sources mention the New Haven Restaurant Association. The Yale source calls the founding entity the New Haven Restaurant Institute. STEMinfo (talk) 23:07, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The chairman to John C. Metz Jr. to reflect recent changes as supported by this source
The number of academic staff to 197; number of undergrads to 3,005 (Fall 2022); number of postgrads to 119 (Fall 2022), all based on thisNational Center for Education Statistics (NCES) report
The Princeton Review selectivity rating to reflect the current number of 75 out of 99 per the updated report
The applications received to 1,887 in fall 2022, with 95% accepted, per NCES
The SAT range of accepted students being 930 to 1200 and ACT composite range being 17 to 26 per this report from College Board
Done In your recommended text, you named a ref that I can't find anywhere else. <ref name=CollegeBoard2024/> You also wrote that the ACT and SAT scores are in this report, but it clearly says not available. I instead used the Princeton Review report, but clarified it that those are numbers CIA self-reported to the Review. I removed the unsourced 2016 transfer data. It doesn't seem important. STEMinfo (talk) 01:33, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
In the Enrollment section:
Enrollment to 3,005 undergrads (415 transfers) and 119 graduates; 95% of students being enrolled full time per the NCES
18% of students being from New York and 12% of students being international per the NCES
82% of students being 24 or younger (replacing the sentence "The student body has an average age of 22 years") per the NCES
Average GPA being 3.0 and 68% of students living on campus per Princeton Review
Replacing the second paragraph with the following, which is more up to date
DoneBINK Robin I learned a lot doing these edits. There were list defined references in the table that I deleted. Those had to be removed from the references or a ref error shows up. Please also include the references in the requested change section, rather than just a ref name, so the reflist talk section doesn't come up with a number and letters and nothing else. It makes it easier to check the refs, particularly if they are being used incorrectly. You can test your future text requests in your sandbox, to make sure the requests won't cause any cascading problems, such as with undefined ref names or stray defined refs that are unused. I also noticed when I went to close this request that you closed it before it was done. It's done now. STEMinfo (talk) 01:56, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This makes some statistical updates and updates the current chairman.
Faculty (note, I made some additional tweaks to this part of the request describing faculty composition)
Extended content
−
Theschool'sfull-timefacultynumberapproximately150. The school differsfrommostcollegesasits faculty islargelycomposedofchefs.<supclass="referencenowrap"><spantitle="Page: ii">: ii </span></sup>Thecollegeemploysanumberof [[American Culinary Federation]]-certified Certified Master Chefs,aswellasMasterBakerscertifiedbythe Retail Bakers of America. Thefacultyalsoincludesauthorsoftextbooks,magazines,andotherpublishedmedia. Manyoftheinstructorsaregraduatesoftheschool.
+
As of Fall 2022, the school had 130 full-time and 67 part-time faculty members. The school's faculty comprises instructors and professionals from food, beverage, and hospitality industries, including [[Liberal arts education|liberal arts]] instructors, including [[American Culinary Federation]] Certified Master Chefs, Retail Bakers of America Certified Master Bakers, [[sommeliers]], authors, [[dietitians]], food industry executives, historians, and other academics.
This makes some statistical updates, offers a clearer timeframe, as well as offers some updated language on the current faculty composition to better reflect the CIA's current faculty.
As of Fall 2022, the school had 130 full-time and 67 part-time faculty members.[3] The school's faculty comprises instructors and professionals from food, beverage, and hospitality industries, including liberal arts instructors, including American Culinary Federation Certified Master Chefs, Retail Bakers of America Certified Master Bakers, sommeliers, authors, dietitians, food industry executives, historians, and other academics.[5]
References
^ abCite error: The named reference Faculty was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
^Cite error: The named reference SelfStudy was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
Undergraduate admission to the Culinary Institute of America is characterized by [[College Board]] as "not selective". The[[PrincetonReview]],inits2017edition, gave the university an admissions selectivity rating of 70 out of 99.
ForthefreshmanclassenteringFall2017, the CulinaryInstituteofAmerica received 989applications of which 934wereacceptedfora94%admissionsrate. The admitted students' academic profile showed an SATaveragescore of 970 to 1190,whiletheaveragecompositeACTscorewas17–23. The school began accepting the [[Common Application]] in 2016, after becoming a member on August 1 of that year.
+
Undergraduate admission to the Culinary Institute of America is characterized by [[College Board]] as "not selective". As of April 2024, [[The Princeton Review]] gave the university an admissions selectivity rating of 75 out of 99.
In fall 2022, the school received 1,887 applications, of which 95 percent were accepted. The admitted students' academic profile showed an [[SAT]] range of 930 to 1200 and an [[ACT (test)|ACT]] composite range of 17 to 26. The school began accepting the [[Common Application]] in 2016, after becoming a member on August 1 of that year.
This makes some needed statistical updates and removes an outdated table for which there is no data to bring it up to date. I'd also question if editors think it is necessary to include the College Board Selectivity Rating, but will defer to the community's thoughts on that. If the selectivity rating is removed, the box below has the updated text.
As of April 2024, The Princeton Review gave the university an admissions selectivity rating of 75 out of 99.[4]
In fall 2022, the school received 1,887 applications, of which 95 percent were accepted.[5] The admitted students' academic profile showed an SAT range of 930 to 1200 and an ACT composite range of 17 to 26.[6] The school began accepting the Common Application in 2016, after becoming a member on August 1 of that year.[3]
References
^ abcCite error: The named reference CBprof was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
^Cite error: The named reference PRprof was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
^ abcCite error: The named reference CommonApp was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
^ abCite error: The named reference NCES was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
^ abCite error: The named reference CollegeBoard2024 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
Enrollment
Extended content
−
In Fall2016, the university had an enrollment of 2,774[[Undergraduateeducation|undergraduatestudents]](including512first-yearstudents)and19 [[graduate student]]s. Ofallstudents,32%arefromthestate of NewYorkand12.2%areinternational students, from37countries. Thestudentbodyhasanaverageageof22years. 57%ofstudents were inthetophalf of theirhighschoolclassrank,with6%intheirclass'stoptenth. The average high school GPAwas3.10. 443studentsappliedtotransfertotheCIA,witha98%admissionrate and 72%enrollmentrateforthoseadmitted. 82% of first-year students lived incollegehousing,while61% of allundergraduateslivedincollegehousing. 100%ofthestudentbodyisenrolledasfull-timestudents.
In2014,undergraduateswereenrolled in fiveschools: theSchoolofCulinaryArts,theSchoolofBaking and PastryArts,theSchoolofBusinessandManagement,theSchoolofLiberalArts and FoodStudies, and theSchoolofCulinaryScienceandNutrition. Withinthebachelorprograms,83%ofstudentmajorsareinbusinessmanagement,10%inculinaryscience, and 6%areinterdisciplinary.
+
In fall 2022, the university had an enrollment of 3,005 [[undergraduate]] students, of which 415 were transfer students, and 119 [[graduate education|graduate]] students; 95 percent of students were enrolled full-time. Of all the students, 18 percent were from New York and 12 percent were international students. Approximately 82 percent of the student body was 24 years of age or younger. The average high school [[grade point average]] was 3.0, and 68 percent of undergraduate students lived on campus.
As of 2024, the school offered certificates in [[culinary arts]]; [[associate degree]]s in [[baking]] and pastry arts and culinary arts; [[bachelor's degree]]s in food business management, [[Hospitality management studies|hospitality management]], applied food studies, and culinary science, as well as culinary arts and baking and pastry arts degrees for transfer students; and [[master's degree]]s in culinary arts, food business, [[Sustainable food system]]s, and wine and beverage management.
This removes a table that has no data to update it, and otherwise updates statistics and degree offerings, mirroring the current language as closely as possible. The templates don't want to play nicely with the tables, so I've separated out the updated table below.
In fall 2022, the university had an enrollment of 3,005 undergraduate students, of which 415 were transfer students, and 119 graduate students; 95 percent of students were enrolled full-time. Of all the students, 18 percent were from New York and 12 percent were international students. Approximately 82 percent of the student body was 24 years of age or younger.[5] The average high school grade point average was 3.0, and 68 percent of undergraduate students lived on campus.[6]
@BINK Robin: The tables really get screwed up with the templates. Instead of posting the whole infobox, just post the lines that change. And the before and after prose isn't just changing numbers - you rewrote a bit also. I'll revisit later. STEMinfo (talk) 00:04, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@STEMinfo: You know, I could have made those prose changes more prominent. That was an oversight on my part. Below is a text diff of just the lines that I'd like to update in the Infobox. As for the rest, I can request those changes separately if you like. Thanks for your patience here. Cheers, BINK Robin (talk) 17:02, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
|chairman = [[Jon L. Luther]]<ref name="AR2015-6"/>John C. Metz Jr.<ref>{{cite web |title=Culinary Institute of America elects John C. Metz Jr. chairman of the board |website=The Culinary Institute of America |date=October 28, 2022 |access-date=April 29, 2024 |url=https://www.ciachef.edu/john-c-metz-jr-chairman-of-the-board-release/}}</ref><br/>
|academic_staff = 197<ref name=NCES>{{cite web |title=College Navigator: Culinary Institute of America |website=National Center for Education Statistics |publisher=United States Department of Education |access-date=April 24, 2024 |url=https://nces.ed.gov/collegenavigator/?q=Culinary+Institute+of+America&s=all&id=190503}}</ref><br/>
|undergrad = 3,005 (Fall 2022)<ref name=NCES/>
|postgrad = 119 (Fall 2022)<ref name=NCES/>
Done@BINK Robin: FYI that you still had Jon Luther's name in the requested text. Also, you might want to let them know that an old indexed but inaccessible otherwise page on their web site still says Luther is Chairman. See this link. STEMinfo (talk) 22:16, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@STEMinfo: Thank you! I’ll pass your note along. I’ve marked this request as answered and will revisit the enrollment and admissions changes later on. Cheers! BINK Robin (talk) 21:13, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi editors, as part of my work with The Culinary Institute of America, I am requesting changes to the Criticism section of the article. Per WP:STRUCTURE and WP:NOCRIT, I think the section should be redistributed into the History section at the appropriate places in the timeline to improve article neutrality and balance.
I'd also be curious for editors' thoughts on the content itself. I think the paragraphs on the 2008 complaints are WP:TMI and contain some details related to L. Timothy Ryan that need qualification per WP:BLPSTYLE, in particular I think adding the word "alleged" regarding his leadership style is important, because sourcing does not offer concrete evidence of a rather serious charge. Additionally, I think that it is important to include Ryan's response to the allegations and his analysis of why things escalated the way they did. Student walkouts are also pretty typical on college campuses and I don't believe they warrant separation into a criticism section. Overall, I think these paragraphs could be tightened up a fair bit with these changes in mind.
The paragraph regarding CCA protests is also over-detailed and the way it is written is a bit confusing. I also think that change to the way any institution is staffed is pretty routine and doesn't seem like it would be major or critical history. The protests were limited to those whose positions were eliminated but didn't extend beyond that, and I think that is pretty routine and a case of WP:NOTEVERYTHING.
Finally, I'd argue that the final paragraph of the current Criticism section contains a significant overabundance of information that is not directly relevant to the CIA as well as a phrase that pretty clearly seems to be WP:OR ("soon after the Weinstein effect began and because of it"). I think there is an opportunity to trim it significantly to keep the content focused on the CIA and keep the article WP:ONTOPIC.
I have created a draft in my user space showing all of what I hope to accomplish and a diff that specifically shows the changes in position and the textual changes that I hope we can use as a starting point.
@STEMinfo: would you be interested in reviewing this request? I did not use TextDiff because that wouldn't really work to show the changes in position and text but hope the diff I linked above explains it better. Cheers BINK Robin (talk) 21:18, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Sdkb, Melchior2006, and Nikkimaria: thank you for taking a look at this request and making the changes you made. Sdkb, I saw your note about moving the section into "History". With the edits that have been made, would any of you feel comfortable with merging the remaining "Criticism" section into the appropriate places in the "History" section, in line with WP:NOCRIT? BINK Robin (talk) 14:53, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think it would be fine to merge the the criticism content into appropriate sections. You can also delete the photo of the demonstration, since the demo was pretty small and the attention it draws is, in my opinion, UNDUE. -- Melchior2006 (talk) 15:03, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Given that our capacity of photos is more constrained than our capacity of sources, DUE doesn't apply in quite the same way. We want the most relevant/due photo for a given section, but if the best-quality photo depicts only a minor event, it can still be a good option/better than nothing. Readers do not expect images to be DUE in the same way as text; they just expect them to be representative.
Therefore, I'd hesitate to remove the photo unless we have a better option available. I'd note for BINK Robin that you have the opportunity to influence our calculus by providing us with high-quality options for the history section uploaded to Commons. The best options are those that depict historical events that happened at the school, not just buildings (which are better for the campus section, although we welcome good images of those too). Sdkbtalk16:06, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]