Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Akgt
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the case of suspected sockpuppetry. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page. All edits should go to the talk page of this case. If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to open a new case of sockpuppetry of the same user, read this for detailed instructions.
- Suspected sockpuppeteer
Akgt (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
- Suspected sockpuppets
ZijaInternational (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
Bobpee (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
- Report submission by
JeremyMcCracken (talk) (contribs) 01:23, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Evidence
All three have edited Zija. Bobpee and Akgt engaged in linkspamming on other articles with links. ZijaInternational has only made one edit; I included them because of the obvious tie from the username. Might not be enough to go on, but it would warrant an inappropriate username block in any event. Akgt hasn't edited in a while, but Bobpee has been very agressive on the article (removing the tags), making me think a block of all of them is a good idea. JeremyMcCracken (talk) (contribs) 01:23, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comments
I'm going to disagree and treat the accounts separately, even though they probably are the same person. ZijaInternational is a username violation, so I'll report it to WP:UAA. Akgt is inactive and unlikely to return. That leaves Bobpee, who perhaps has been unhelpful but not enough to justify a block. I'll ask Jeremy if this solves the problem. Shalom (Hello • Peace) 04:55, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- That would probably be fine; I just wanted to bring it to administrator attention from the spam concerns, but their article got deleted, so that might be enough to get them to stop. Thanks, JeremyMcCracken (talk) (contribs) 04:59, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Conclusions
One stale, one blocked, one left. GBT/C 16:58, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]