Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/210.194.40.149
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the case of suspected sockpuppetry. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page. All edits should go to the talk page of this case. If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to open a new case of sockpuppetry of the same user, read this for detailed instructions.
- Suspected sockpuppeteer
- 210.194.40.149 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
- Suspected sockpuppets
- Report submission by
ScienceApologist (talk) 00:51, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Evidence
Same old same old.
- Comments
In other words, sockpuppet of banned user Davkal (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). I agree with this, per the similar edits by another user reported earlier today by ScienceApologist with the same editing profile. Yechiel (Shalom) 01:04, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Agreed. The account is consistent with other Davkal socks, and this time it was successful in getting SA blocked, which appears to be his current goal. PhilKnight (talk) 01:52, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Heh, I gather the Community doesn't mind Davkal and his two (three given recent events) enablers continuing to disrupt talkpages? Shot info (talk) 06:21, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Conclusions
To EdJohnston: The other SSP case was for Clarityschmarity (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)[1]
Will blocking the IP do any good? Maybe. The risk of collateral damage seems low because it has never edited before. I'd suggest blocking for two weeks to a month and tagging the userpage as a Davkal sock. I think the link between the IP and Clarityschmarity is solid. Yechiel (Shalom) Editor review 04:40, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
OK, I'm persuaded. I've blocked the IP one month and tagged it as a Davkal sock. Closing this report. EdJohnston (talk) 05:13, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]