Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Robertjkoenig
- This RfC is closed. Do not add more comments to it. Fred-Chess 03:31, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
In order to remain listed at Wikipedia:Requests for comment, at least two people need to show that they tried to resolve a dispute with this user and have failed. This must involve the same dispute with a single user, not different disputes or multiple users. The persons complaining must provide evidence of their efforts, and each of them must certify it by signing this page with ~~~~. If this does not happen within 48 hours of the creation of this dispute page (which was: 21:06, 3 January 2006 (UTC) -1.5 hours), the page will be deleted. The current date and time is: 20:21, 8 July 2024 (UTC).
- (Robertjkoenig | talk | contributions)
- sockpuppet (Zorro redux | talk | contributions)
- IP (66.182.81.34 | talk | contributions)
- IP (71.245.244.207 | talk | contributions)
Users should only edit one summary or view, other than to endorse.
Statement of the dispute
[edit]This is a summary written by users who dispute this user's conduct. Users signing other sections ("Response" or "Outside views") should not edit the "Statement of the dispute" section.
Description
[edit]{Add summary here, but you must use the section below to certify or endorse it. Users who edit or endorse this summary should not edit the other summaries, other than to endorse them.}
Robertjkoenig, his suspected sockpuppet, and IP's have been consistently placing information into articles that displays a blatant point of view and contains a myriad of unencyclopaedic information. He has attempted to turn the USAA article, its talk page, the Unincorporated reciprocal inter-insurance exchange article, and its talk page into his own personal blog by repeatedly trying to post details of his arrest that he claims was orchestrated by the CEO of USAA. He also places long, unsubstantiated rants into the article and post identical pieces into the talk page. He accuses anyone that opposes his conspiracy of working for the company and attempting to silence him. He also modifies the content of other users' comments, moves their position on the talk page, or deletes them all together. Mr. Koenig has a documented history regarding disputes at USAA, which sours his position regarding them. See: [1].
Evidence of disputed behavior
[edit](Provide diffs. Links to entire articles aren't helpful unless the editor created the entire article. Edit histories also aren't helpful as they change as new edits are performed.)
- Version of the Unincorporated reciprocal inter-insurance exchange article with the details of his arrest from today
- Version of the USAA article with a scaled down version of the arrest
- Talk:USAA
- Talk:USAA/Archive01
- Talk:Unincorporated reciprocal inter-insurance exchange
- True v. USAA (Now on AfD: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/True v. USAA)
- Talk:Bexar County District Court
Applicable policies
[edit]{list the policies that apply to the disputed conduct}
Evidence of trying and failing to resolve the dispute
[edit](provide diffs and links)
Users certifying the basis for this dispute
[edit]{Users who tried and failed to resolve the dispute}
(sign with ~~~~)
Other users who endorse this summary
[edit](sign with ~~~~)
- Blatantly unencyclopedic, and I believe such inclusions should be considered vandalism and reverted without recourse to WP:3RR. FCYTravis 03:14, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
- Movementarian has been incredibly patient in dealing with Koenig, yet Koenig shows persistent disregard for Wikipedia's goals and policies. --Allen 03:26, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
- Since I don't know if me coming along in the last day warrants being placed in the certifying section I will just place my two cents here. 24.160.136.10 08:55, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
- I had a hand in trying to deal with this Koenig guy. For some unknown reason, he just doesn't understand that Wikipedia is NOT a blog. I made a few positive suggestions (like starting a new article, or better yet taking his allegations to the media), but he won't listen. I don't know what this guy's problem is but the bottom line is his contributions are not constructive towards making Wikipedia better. Dknights411 01:54, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Joe 20:10, 18 January 2006 (UTC).
- This user appears to have a long history of campaigning against this company in various electronic media. Robert McClenon 20:23, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
Response
[edit]This is a summary written by the user whose conduct is disputed, or by other users who think that the dispute is unjustified and that the above summary is biased or incomplete. Users signing other sections ("Statement of the dispute" and "Outside Views") should not edit the "Response" section.
{Add summary here, but you must use the endorsement section below to sign. Users who edit or endorse this summary should not edit the other summaries.}
Users who endorse this summary (sign with ~~~~):
Outside view
[edit]This is a summary written by users not directly involved with the dispute but who would like to add an outside view of the dispute. Users editing other sections ("Statement of the dispute" and "Response") should not edit the "Outside Views" section, except to endorse an outside view.
{Add summary here, but you must use the endorsement section below to sign. Users who edit or endorse this summary should not edit the other summaries.}
Users who endorse this summary (sign with ~~~~):
Discussion
[edit]All signed comments and talk not related to an endorsement should be directed to this page's discussion page. Discussion should not be added below. Discussion should be posted on the talk page. Threaded replies to another user's vote, endorsement, evidence, response, or comment should be posted to the talk page.
Blocked
[edit]I've blocked Zorro redux and Robertjkoenig for 24 hours for repeatedly inserting the same material into many articles. --Carnildo 08:30, 4 January 2006 (UTC)