Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2012 September 7
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Contents
- 1 September 7
- 1.1 File:Inflatable Boat.jpg
- 1.2 File:Lincoln family tree.jpg
- 1.3 File:Makati skyline.jpg
- 1.4 File:Bz14.gif
- 1.5 File:Bz13.gif
- 1.6 File:Bz11.gif
- 1.7 File:Bz12.gif
- 1.8 File:Bz10.gif
- 1.9 File:Bell X-16 2.jpg
- 1.10 File:Cliff Island.jpg
- 1.11 File:Comet-Halley's-tail-NASA-1986-b&w.jpg
- 1.12 File:1-LUP9036 cropped.jpg
- 1.13 File:Cropped Earth with Sunburst.PNG
- 1.14 File:Culaoresat.JPG
- 1.15 File:TotalGym14000.jpg
- 1.16 File:TotalGymPowerTower.jpg
- 1.17 File:Rudy Jahchan.jpg
- 1.18 File:Chirocad 300dpi.png
- 1.19 File:SilberHonors.jpg
- 1.20 File:De spacecraftb.jpg
- 1.21 File:MinneapolisDowntownEastNeighborhood.PNG
- 1.22 File:Hamburg1843Medal.jpg
- 1.23 File:303LogStudUnit.jpg
- 1.24 File:963 AWACS.JPG
- 1.25 File:BoNM Rhodesia3.JPG
- 1.26 File:Greysscoutbadge.JPG
- 1.27 File:FlightSergeantRankBadge.jpg
- 1.28 File:RhodesianArmouredCarRegt.JPG
- 1.29 File:MasterSergeantRank.jpg
- 1.30 File:MasterTechnicianRank.gif
- 1.31 File:MorganzaMap.jpg
- 1.32 File:Ogden Portrait.JPG
- 1.33 File:Vicksburg-USCT.JPG
September 7
[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:04, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Inflatable Boat.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Tagged as self-created, but a source URL [1] is given. —Bkell (talk) 00:03, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The uploader has been blocked indefinitely as a spam-only account. —Bkell (talk) 00:04, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:04, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Lincoln family tree.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Tagged {{PD-US}}, which claims that the image is in the public domain in the United States, and the date is given as "1910s". But the dates on this family tree go all the way to 1985, so the image is at most 27 years old, and unlikely to be in the public domain. —Bkell (talk) 00:23, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F9 by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 05:04, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Makati skyline.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Uploader claims to be the creator, but gives a source URL to the SkyscraperCity forum [2]. The relevant post in that thread, which contains a larger version of this photo with a watermark reading "chamz_2011", quotes an earlier post [3], which in turn credits the photo to "cyberdude2010" on Flickr. After a bit of poking around on Flickr, I found what may be the original source [4]. It is clear that this Flickr image is at least closer to the original source than either the image uploaded here or the SkyscraperCity post, because it is dated earlier than both of them and it shows a larger view. The Flickr description page says "All Rights Reserved". —Bkell (talk) 01:20, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:04, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Bz14.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).
- I doubt that the uploader is the copyright holder. Leyo 14:35, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Derivative image of a copyrighted source. The image has a pair of ears photoshopped onto ti. -- 76.65.131.248 (talk) 08:03, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:04, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Bz13.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).
- I doubt that the uploader is the copyright holder. Leyo 14:36, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Derivative image of a copyrighted source. The image has a pair of ears photoshopped onto ti. -- 76.65.131.248 (talk) 08:03, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:04, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Bz11.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).
- I doubt that the uploader is the copyright holder. Leyo 14:36, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Derivative image of a copyrighted source. The image has a pair of ears photoshopped onto ti. -- 76.65.131.248 (talk) 08:03, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:04, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Bz12.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).
- I doubt that the uploader is the copyright holder. Leyo 14:37, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Derivative image of a copyrighted source. The image has a pair of ears photoshopped onto ti. -- 76.65.131.248 (talk) 08:03, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:04, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Bz10.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).
- I doubt that the uploader is the copyright holder. Leyo 14:37, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Derivative image of a copyrighted source. The image has a pair of ears photoshopped onto ti. -- 76.65.131.248 (talk) 08:03, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:04, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Bell X-16 2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Image of X-16 in linked source is different Bulwersator (talk) 15:59, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- We already have an image of the Bell X-16 on the Commons, and it's a different aircraft. Wing placement, shape of canopy are not the same. -- Dianna (talk) 04:30, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:04, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Cliff Island.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- No evidence that it is a NASA picture Bulwersator (talk) 16:22, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- It looks like a WWII image to me. The altitude is not high enough that it has to be NASA. -- Dianna (talk) 04:05, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Keep. Dianna (talk) 04:13, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Without source that allows verification of licence and description Bulwersator (talk) 16:24, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Just because a link has gone dead since the image was uploaded does not mean it's unsourced. —C.Fred (talk) 16:46, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Located archive link using the Wayback Machine. -- Dianna (talk) 04:13, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as G6 by BorgQueen (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:08, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:1-LUP9036 cropped.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- see http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:1_LUP9036.jpg Bulwersator (talk) 16:27, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 10:08, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Without source that allows verification of licence and description Bulwersator (talk) 16:32, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment considering what the Daily Mail published, this has to be a NASA photo taken from the 1996 Shuttle Endeavour spaceflight. The cloud formations make it impossible for it to be any other trip. -- 76.65.131.248 (talk) 08:19, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks, moved to Commons Bulwersator (talk) 08:29, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 10:08, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Culaoresat.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Maybe I am blind, but there is no image like this in source Bulwersator (talk) 17:30, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment it looks like SC:AST_L1A.003:2042032977 cropped to just the island. [5][6] -- 76.65.131.248 (talk) 08:11, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks, moved to Commons Bulwersator (talk) 08:31, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
![[5]](http://ava.jpl.nasa.gov/public/2007/04/02/20070402031817.jpg){kind=link}
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:04, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:TotalGym14000.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Tagged {{GFDL-self}}; uploader claims "efi Sports Medicine, Inc. authorizes this image to be used on Wikipedia." No evidence is provided that the uploader is the copyright holder or that EFI Sports Medicine has released this image under the GFDL. Note also that a Wikipedia-only license is (perhaps surprisingly) not sufficient for Wikipedia; see WP:COPYREQ for example. —Bkell (talk) 17:45, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:04, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:TotalGymPowerTower.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- See the preceding listing. This image is from the same uploader and apparently comes from the same source. —Bkell (talk) 17:48, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:04, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Rudy Jahchan.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Tagged with {{cc-by-sa-2.5}}. Sourced to a blog called The Laughing Squid [7]. The copyright notice at the bottom of the blog says that it is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States license. "NonCommercial" and "NoDerivs" are not free enough for Wikipedia. —Bkell (talk) 18:07, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:04, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Chirocad 300dpi.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
- "This file is in the public domain because its copyright has expired in the United States and those countries with a copyright term of no more than the life of the author plus 100 years.", without author/source Bulwersator (talk) 18:14, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:04, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:SilberHonors.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- probably fails de minimis ( http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/De_minimis ) Bulwersator (talk) 18:49, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: converted to non-free. You might want to get on writing a fair use rationale, though, since I'm not going to be writing one for you. SchuminWeb (Talk) 15:13, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:De spacecraftb.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- "I cannot confirm that it is produced by NASA" Bulwersator (talk) 19:13, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Convert to Fair Use add a FUR. It was launched into space, and then reentered and burned up, therefore no new free images can be created. -- 76.65.131.248 (talk) 07:46, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Convert to Fair Use per 76.65.131.248 --WingtipvorteX PTT ∅ 14:58, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Here's the image gallery if anyone's interested.--Craigboy (talk) 23:08, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Bottom line: there is no source listed for any version of this file. SchuminWeb (Talk) 15:20, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Derivative of possibly unfree file - see https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Mpls.png&action=edit&redlink=1 Bulwersator (talk) 19:27, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. The original file, uploaded on May 16, 2007, was indeed derived from the file that was deleted. However, that is NOT true of the current version which was uploaded on August 23, 2007. The file summary has been edited to reflect this. Eco84 | Talk 20:54, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- File:Hamburg1843Medal.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Photo is derivative of probably unfree, copyrighted work Bulwersator (talk) 19:36, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment the medal was made in 1843, why would it be copyrighted? -- 76.65.131.248 (talk) 07:51, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 17:09, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:303LogStudUnit.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- "as seen on CBS tv show The Unit" - derivative of unfree work Bulwersator (talk) 19:41, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Image was created by me using official U.S. Army logo which is owned by the U.S. Govrenment and is therefore in the public domain. It incorporates basic (not stylized) text of the name of a U.S. Army military unit. The entire image was created by me utilizing public doomain elements. It is similiar to the image used on the CBS tv show. CBS can copyrght their tv show, but they can not copyright public domain imagery that they incorporate into their copyrighted tv show. Bulwersator, please stop nominating every single image on Wikipedia for deletion. If you would bother to look at the images and their licensing/sourcing information, you would see that your blanket nomintaions for deletion are unwarranted and a waste of resources. Sf46 (talk) 12:32, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment If this is the emblem of an actual Army unit, the proper template to indicate the usage is {{PD-USGov-Military-Army-USAIOH}}. Note that such images are not in the public domain. Non-commercial use is permitted, but the military retains a copyright to the image and permission for commercial use must be granted. If it is the image only of the fictional unit in the TV show, it seems that the work is unfree.--Lineagegeek (talk) 17:22, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 23:01, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:963 AWACS.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Original work may be copyrighted Bulwersator (talk) 19:42, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep This image was taken by me of a patch of the 963 AWACS squadron. This image/design is owned by the United States Air Force and as such is in the public domain. I have released my claim to the photo that I took, so there is no question whatsoever thhat this image is in the public domain. Bulwersator, please stop nominating every single image on Wikipedia for deletion. If you would bother to look at the images and their licensing/sourcing information, you would see that your blanket nomintaions for deletion are unwarranted and a waste of resources.Sf46 (talk) 12:23, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. No evidence provided that the original work is copyrighted; plenty of evidence provided that the original work is in the public domain. —C.Fred (talk) 16:30, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep but Amend Emblems of USAF organizations are not the work of USAF airmen. They are created by The Institute of Heraldry. Thr proper template to indicate the usage is {{PD-USGov-Military-Army-USAIOH}}. Note that they are not in the public domain. Non-commercial use is permitted, but the military retains a copyright to the image and permission for commercial use must be granted.--Lineagegeek (talk) 17:15, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Moved and amended on Commons Bulwersator (talk) 17:22, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- File:BoNM Rhodesia3.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Original work may be copyrighted Bulwersator (talk) 19:42, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment it's a Wikipedia Barnstar, and the Rhodesia flag is on Commons, plus it looks like the normal barnstar, also on Commons, attached to the flag of Rhodesia... so obviously a user created image ; where's the problem? -- 76.65.131.248 (talk) 07:55, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Ops. I thought that "Rhodesian Barnstar of National Merit" is serious award. Sorry. Bulwersator (talk) 08:15, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 19:11, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Greysscoutbadge.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Original work may be copyrighted Bulwersator (talk) 19:42, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Image info and licensing updated to non-free historic image. Sf46 (talk) 21:12, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT⚡ 22:15, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 19:11, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Original work may be copyrighted Bulwersator (talk) 19:42, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Image info and licensing updated to non-free historic image. Sf46 (talk) 15:34, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT⚡ 16:11, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 19:11, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Original work may be copyrighted Bulwersator (talk) 19:43, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Image info and licensing updated to non-free historic image. Sf46 (talk) 21:36, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT⚡ 22:15, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 19:11, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:MasterSergeantRank.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Original work may be copyrighted Bulwersator (talk) 19:43, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Image info and licensing updated to non-free historic image. Sf46 (talk) 13:01, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT⚡ 13:10, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 19:11, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:MasterTechnicianRank.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Original work may be copyrighted Bulwersator (talk) 19:43, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Image info and licensing updated to non-free historic image. Sf46 (talk) 13:07, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT⚡ 13:10, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep. SchuminWeb (Talk) 15:14, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:MorganzaMap.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Original work may be copyrighted Bulwersator (talk) 19:43, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Information and license tags updated. Image is in public domain because work done by uploader has been released to public domain, part of the image was created by the US Department of Commerce, and due to the age of the public map which was created prior to 1964. Sf46 (talk) 13:51, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- File:Ogden Portrait.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Original work may be copyrighted Bulwersator (talk) 19:43, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Same as the USCT Statue. This photograph was taken by me (as stated in the source info) at Vicksburg National Battelfield which is owned by the U.S. Government. The U.S. Government owns the plaque which automatically makes the plaque public domain. I only own the photograph that I took of this public domain plaque. I have already released my rights to the photo that I took into the public domain. Bulwersator, please stop nominating every single image on Wikipedia for deletion. If you would bother to look at the images and their licensing/sourcing information, you would see that your blanket nomintaions for deletion are unwarranted and a waste of resources.
- "The U.S. Government owns the plaque which automatically makes the plaque public domain" - untrue (works by federal government are automatic PD) + not mentioned in file description Bulwersator (talk) 12:21, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The "original work" in question is the photograph, not the statue: a photograph of a 3D work of art is a separate work that may be copyrighted (see Wikipedia:FAQ/Copyright). I'm closing this nomination; the work is clearly free. —C.Fred (talk) 16:41, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- File:Vicksburg-USCT.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Original work may be copyrighted Bulwersator (talk) 19:44, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep This photograph was taken by me (as stated in the source info) at Vicksburg National Battelfield which is owned by the U.S. Government. The U.S. Government owns the statue which automatically makes the statue public domain. I only own the photograph that I took of this public domain statue. I have already released my rights to the photo that I took into the public domain. Bulwersator, please stop nominating every single image on Wikipedia for deletion. If you would bother to look at the images and their licensing/sourcing information, you would see that your blanket nomintaions for deletion are unwarranted and a waste of resources. Sf46 (talk) 12:12, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- "The U.S. Government owns the statue which automatically makes the statue public domain" - untrue (works by federal government are automatic PD) + not mentioned in file description Bulwersator (talk) 12:21, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The original work is the photograph, not the statue: see Wikipedia:FAQ/Copyright. Sf46 has licensed the photograph into the public domain. I'm closing this early as an inappropriate nomination. —C.Fred (talk) 16:38, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.