Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2012 March 8
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Contents
- 1 March 8
- 1.1 File:Worlddog.jpg
- 1.2 File:Dunantanimation.gif
- 1.3 File:Miesha "Takedown" Tate.jpg
- 1.4 File:PlanetLogo2012.jpg
- 1.5 File:Archbishop John DU.jpg
- 1.6 File:Bishop Manuel Salvador.jpg
- 1.7 File:Archbishop Cipriano Urgel.jpg
- 1.8 File:Bishop Cipriano Urgel.jpg
- 1.9 File:Archbishop Pedro Dean.jpg
- 1.10 File:Bishop Teotimo Pacis.jpg
- 1.11 File:Bishop Lino Gonzaga.jpg
- 1.12 File:Bishop Manuel Mascariñas.jpg
- 1.13 File:COA Archdiocese of Palo.jpg
- 1.14 File:Sacred Heart Seminary.jpg
- 1.15 File:Old Palo Cathedral.jpg
- 1.16 File:Camp De Thiaroye movie poster.jpg
- 1.17 File:Ca twiste a poponguine aka Rocking Popenguine.jpg
- 1.18 File:Dont-soak-in-olympic-hot-springs-warning.jpg
- 1.19 File:Redbox Case.jpg
- 1.20 File:NAMCTW.JPG
- 1.21 File:Nuestra Senora Penafrancia de Naga.jpg
- 1.22 File:Deception Dollar On Table.jpg
- 1.23 File:Stefan Fatsis.JPG
- 1.24 File:CityPlaza IMG 6368a.jpg
![1.3 File:Miesha "Takedown" Tate.jpg](#File:Miesha_"Takedown"_Tate.jpg){kind=link}
March 8
[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as G7 by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 17:12, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Worlddog.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Fastily tagged "no source" but I think that it may need a PUF discussion because of the complex situation. The uploader, User:Dakman111, did indeed not list any source – the file information page was empty. A "self" template was later added by a different user, User:Dpm12. From what I can see, both users' user pages state that they are brothers, so I would assume that the users interacted off-wiki and cleared the source issue, but it would be nice to have a confirmation about this. Stefan2 (talk) 00:58, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. At least on the grounds of PUF. It looks like an amateur photo, and google confirms that the image probably doesn't exist anywhere else on the Internet. —JmaJeremy talk contribs 03:35, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. My brother must've logged into my account and uploaded it. I hate that picture. I will delete right now as Dakman111. - Dpm12; 8 March 2012 7:42 (PST)
Dpm12 again (logged on as Dakman111) will you please delete the picture. I put a delete request template on there. Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dakman111 (talk • contribs) 15:53, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Looks useless, so no need to keep. No opposition to deletion. --Stefan2 (talk) 15:56, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Dunantanimation.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Photograph decorated with a silly, unencyclopedic animation effect. Uploader claims "own work" status for the animation, but source and status of original photograph is not accounted for. Most likely non-free (photograph or screenshot of an actor) Fut.Perf. ☼ 10:27, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Miesha "Takedown" Tate.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:PlanetLogo2012.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Archbishop John DU.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Dubious own work: uploads of photos of archbishops in office since the 1930s until 2012. It is unlikely that anyone would be capable of producing such photos continuously since the 1930s. Stefan2 (talk) 14:03, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Bishop Manuel Salvador.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Dubious own work: uploads of photos of archbishops in office since the 1930s until 2012. It is unlikely that anyone would be capable of producing such photos continuously since the 1930s. Stefan2 (talk) 14:03, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F1 by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 17:12, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Dubious own work: uploads of photos of archbishops in office since the 1930s until 2012. It is unlikely that anyone would be capable of producing such photos continuously since the 1930s. Stefan2 (talk) 14:03, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Bishop Cipriano Urgel.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Dubious own work: uploads of photos of archbishops in office since the 1930s until 2012. It is unlikely that anyone would be capable of producing such photos continuously since the 1930s. Stefan2 (talk) 14:04, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Archbishop Pedro Dean.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Dubious own work: uploads of photos of archbishops in office since the 1930s until 2012. It is unlikely that anyone would be capable of producing such photos continuously since the 1930s. Stefan2 (talk) 14:04, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Bishop Teotimo Pacis.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Dubious own work: uploads of photos of archbishops in office since the 1930s until 2012. It is unlikely that anyone would be capable of producing such photos continuously since the 1930s. Stefan2 (talk) 14:04, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Bishop Lino Gonzaga.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Dubious own work: uploads of photos of archbishops in office since the 1930s until 2012. It is unlikely that anyone would be capable of producing such photos continuously since the 1930s. Stefan2 (talk) 14:05, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Dubious own work: uploads of photos of archbishops in office since the 1930s until 2012. It is unlikely that anyone would be capable of producing such photos continuously since the 1930s. Stefan2 (talk) 14:05, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Sacred Heart Seminary.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- The uploader appears to have uploaded many copyvios. No EXIF. Can't find on Google or Tineye, though. Stefan2 (talk) 14:10, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:03, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Old Palo Cathedral.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Same photo? --Stefan2 (talk) 14:11, 8 March 2012 (UTC) Stefan2 (talk) 14:11, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- There is no evidence that the image is hosted on the specified site. Additionally, there is no evidence that the image was created by the specified site, so the site's licence terms might not apply for this image. Stefan2 (talk) 14:30, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- There is no evidence that the image is hosted on the specified site. Additionally, there is no evidence that the image was created by the specified site, so the site's licence terms might not apply for this image. Stefan2 (talk) 14:32, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 12:08, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Looks a bit 3D to me with the camera angle and stuff at the bottom, so might need permission from the photographer. Stefan2 (talk) 19:33, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep. — ξxplicit 04:04, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Redbox Case.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Derivative work. {{PD-ineligible}} or not? Stefan2 (talk) 19:34, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep I don't understand the issue; it's a picture of a DVD case used by the service, what is it derivative of? We have a picture of Netflix's red envelope in that article, why is this any different? Not to mention the text doesn't meet the threshold of originality, so that just leaves the plastic case. Nate • (chatter) 05:29, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Public domain—useful articleKeep current tags as underlying work is useful article. The DVD case has no independent creative elements separable from its utilitarian use as a container for DVDs, except for the label, which is not central to the image and therefore de minimis. RJaguar3 | u | t 08:48, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:NAMCTW.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Permanently installed or not? The fact that it is indoors is irrelevant since it is in the UK. Stefan2 (talk) 20:00, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Replica of Our Lady of Peñafrancia. The original is PD, but it is unknown when the replica was made and if it got a copyright of its own. Stefan2 (talk) 20:53, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Original dollar notes are PD-USGov, but what about this one? Stefan2 (talk) 21:03, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:05, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Stefan Fatsis.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).
- The man shows some books. Are they really de minimis? Also note that the image has got some lossy rotation, so if kept, this would have to be reverted and rotated properly. Stefan2 (talk) 21:13, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I've cropped out the books. Tra (Talk) 22:31, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:CityPlaza IMG 6368a.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- See Commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:CityPlaza Hong Kong.jpg. Stefan2 (talk) 21:30, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.