Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2012 August 2
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Contents
August 2
[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:00, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Copyrighted restored by URAA, without fair use rationale. Additionally author is unknown but " When using this template, please provide information of where the image was first published and who created it." Bulwersator (talk) 05:48, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:00, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:@UKLogo.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).
- "it consists entirely of typefaces, individual words, handwriting, slogans, or simple geometric shapes" is not true - see http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:@UKLogo.gif
Probably may be kept as fair use. Bulwersator (talk) 07:14, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep. — ξxplicit 01:23, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:MLWGSGIS.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- "Permission to use the photo was granted by the school." requires OTRS ticket, especially as "Source Taken from the school's website" is quite suspicious. Bulwersator (talk) 10:25, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Here's the last discussion of trying to delete it: Wikipedia:Files_for_deletion/2008_January_2#Image:MLWGSGIS.jpg. My statement from 2008 stands: if you want to delete it, go ahead. I could have found the mentioned email in 2008; now it's probably a lost cause (it'll be buried in an Outloook 2003 .pst file I have backed up...somewhere...but I no longer have Outlook installed anywhere.). Presumably one of the students will notice when there's no picture and badger the school into re-releasing a newer, (hopefully larger and better-quality) picture. -- stillnotelf is invisible 15:36, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - commons:Commons:Requests for comment/Grandfathered old files. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 06:05, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 04:01, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Mintransporte.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
- "Created by me for wikipedia and sister projects use only." Bulwersator (talk) 10:29, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:00, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:John hager official.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- No evidence that used licence is correct, unused in articles. Bulwersator (talk) 11:55, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F5 by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:00, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Fulham crest.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
- This image was contributed for use on Wikipedia, but the contributor did not explicitly release it under any free license. Therefore it requires WP:FUR. Bulwersator (talk) 15:35, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I have copied the FUR from File:Fulham FC.svg. The point of contact on the OTRS ticket did provide this version of the logo and wished for it to be used rather than the version that had been in use. However, I note that it's now orphaned as a new SVG version of the logo is being used with presumably no complaints. So perhaps this should be tagged for deletion per CSD F5, rendering this discussion moot? — madman 15:52, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:01, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:AHowell.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- I see no evidence that copyright was not renewed Bulwersator (talk) 15:40, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I've contacted the source page's administrator, Ms. Sherry Gresham Gritzbaugh, in an attempt to determine the true status of the photo. I've also asked her for a release if a copyright is in fact still in effect. I'd appreciate any deletions of this being held off until we can make a true determination of the photo's copyright status from here. Sf46 (talk) 02:03, 5 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:ClaremontDesign.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
- I dispute "it consists entirely of typefaces, individual words, handwriting, slogans, or simple geometric shapes" - shapes seems to be quite complex. Bulwersator (talk) 15:49, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:00, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:ClaremontDesign.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
- I dispute "it consists entirely of typefaces, individual words, handwriting, slogans, or simple geometric shapes" - shapes seems to be quite complex. Bulwersator (talk) 15:49, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.