Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2011 January 19
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| < January 18 | January 20 > |
|---|
Contents
- 1 January 19
- 1.1 File:Kcoates.jpg
- 1.2 File:Attheedgeoftime.jpg
- 1.3 File:Asiatic Journal of Biotechnology Resources.jpg
- 1.4 File:Johnjafferjanardhananfilm.jpg
- 1.5 File:Mmaraju5.jpg
- 1.6 File:Seductive-3.jpg
- 1.7 File:Big water can @ US 11-250 in Staunton, Virginia.jpg
- 1.8 File:OrelekZygmuntaS.jpg
- 1.9 File:Ahmad Basri Akil.jpg
- 1.10 File:Truthwillout.jpg
- 1.11 File:James.jpg
- 1.12 File:Maitreya Mi Fo Hsiang Te.jpg
- 1.13 File:Rv6set2.jpg
- 1.14 File:Thurston.jpeg
- 1.15 File:UWMC-Schematic.png
- 1.16 File:Carlos Verna.jpg
- 1.17 File:SHAFAGH 2 -6.jpg
- 1.18 File:Strumble Head Lighthouse.jpg
- 1.19 File:Matthiasfcowley.gif
- 1.20 File:Seoul Subway Station Map.JPG
- 1.21 File:Bashkim Shehu.jpg
- 1.22 File:CRE Pierson's Puppeteer-0684dedb ful.jpg
January 19
[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as G12 by Lifebaka (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:05, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Kcoates.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- http://newsrelease.uwaterloo.ca/gallery/Faculty/Coates_1944.jpg.php TheMightyQuill (talk) 06:41, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:11, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Attheedgeoftime.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- A cover is most likely not free. MGA73 (talk) 09:32, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:11, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Cover of a book. Most likely not free. MGA73 (talk) 09:33, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: close as non-free. To answer Arfazph's question, no, you should not remove the PUF tag before the listing is closed (it is considered very bad form), however, your converting the image to non-free with a rationale is specifically what caused the image to be retained rather than deleted entirely. SchuminWeb (Talk) 01:13, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- A cover is most likely not free. MGA73 (talk) 09:36, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I have tagged the image with Non-free media use rationale and proper license. Can I remove the puf template? Arfazph (talk) 10:04, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT⚡ 11:23, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:11, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Mmaraju5.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- A poster is most likely not free. This one is unused. MGA73 (talk) 09:39, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:11, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Seductive-3.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- It looks like a cover and in that case the band has the copyright for it. Tineye gave no hits and I could not find any hits on Google so it may also a image made by uploader. MGA73 (talk) 09:53, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Gimme danger (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:22, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I believe that this is most likely a derivative work of the copyrighted watering can sculpture. Due to lack of freedom of panorama for public artwork, we can't define this image as free. As a non-free image, it would fail WP:NFCC#8 for both of its usages, as it is in a gallery for one usage, and not the subject of any critical commentary in the other (just a "here it is" kind of thing). SchuminWeb (Talk) 11:58, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Sculptor is listed in this article as Willy Ferguson, owner of Ferguson's Metal Fabrication of Staunton, VA. From the quotes in the article, it sounds like he might be willing to sign off on us using this image (or provide another one himself) if he were contacted. -Hit bull, win steak(Moo!) 02:18, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I hope so, because from what I've read about him, he seems like a real technophobe. In any case, this effort to delete the image disturbs me, because it seems that if we can't show this on Wikipedia we can't show The Big Duck either. ----DanTD (talk) 13:40, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- An argument could be made that the Big Duck is architecture, which is allowed under freedom of panorama, but the watering can sculpture is definitely public artwork, which isn't allowed under freedom of panorama. SchuminWeb (Talk) 01:03, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- If all else fails, can we at least use the article Hit Bull, Win Steak suggested, and archive it if the newspaper that controls that article kills it? ----DanTD (talk) 05:48, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The watering can might have standalone notability, which would bode well for those wanting a photo of it. I remember Jim McCloskey at The News Leader did a cartoon poking fun at it right after it was installed, and so one might be able to patch together enough stuff to establish the watering can's notability. If that happens, I'll go down to Staunton and make a non-free derivative work of it myself (and I'm sure my parents would love to see me while I'm down that way), and then add the fair use rationale for it since only then would it have contextual significance. Either way, though, the photo we're discussing here sucks, and I see no reason to hang onto it in any case. SchuminWeb (Talk) 03:33, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- If all else fails, can we at least use the article Hit Bull, Win Steak suggested, and archive it if the newspaper that controls that article kills it? ----DanTD (talk) 05:48, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- An argument could be made that the Big Duck is architecture, which is allowed under freedom of panorama, but the watering can sculpture is definitely public artwork, which isn't allowed under freedom of panorama. SchuminWeb (Talk) 01:03, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I hope so, because from what I've read about him, he seems like a real technophobe. In any case, this effort to delete the image disturbs me, because it seems that if we can't show this on Wikipedia we can't show The Big Duck either. ----DanTD (talk) 13:40, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:12, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:OrelekZygmuntaS.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- File has no source, with the law act which makes it governmental symbol. File is a private reproduction of 16th century seal. Author is Adam Kromer and he didn't give any permission to use this file. Links in Description file. It's not a simple derivative work based on a public domain seal, but reconstruction with traces of author's creavity. This work isn't ineligible. No permission to use whis file, from the page Adam Kromer, who created it in 2001. JDavid (talk) 12:06, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:11, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Ahmad Basri Akil.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- I have concerns about the ownership of this image. It is widely used over the Internet, and I believe it was so before it was uploaded here. Maybe the uploader can shed light on the ownership. Muhandes (talk) 12:24, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:11, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Truthwillout.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Dubious claim of self creation. Uploader has a history of other file problems. Image is scattered about the Internet, and likely obtained in that manner. If the creator is the uploader, a message from Wikileaks will be sufficient to establish it was created for them by this person and rights are released. Hammersoft (talk) 14:25, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:55, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:James.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- www.jamesjthomas.com ccwaters (talk) 14:30, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:11, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- No freedom of panorama in Taiwan.[1] Kelly hi! 17:19, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- See also File:Ti Tsang 1.jpg. Kelly hi! 18:24, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:12, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Rv6set2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Orphan, sole contribution by uploader, uncertain copyright status. Kelly hi! 17:50, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- This link asserts copyright by James Thorall, the man credited as the author on the uploaded image's page. -Hit bull, win steak(Moo!) 02:12, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:12, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Thurston.jpeg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- No evidence uploader is the copyright holder of this file. Kelly hi! 18:23, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:11, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:UWMC-Schematic.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
- No evidence uploader is copyright holder of these blueprints. Kelly hi! 18:35, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:12, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Carlos Verna.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- The file does not have a valid license. It has something that looks like Commons:Template:PD-AR-Presidency but that template links to "no license". It also mention something about fair use in the text but if it is a living person that may be a problem. MGA73 (talk) 19:20, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:11, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:SHAFAGH 2 -6.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Unlikely to be the work of the uploader (a user blocked for copyright violation) MilborneOne (talk) 20:26, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Also:
- File:Iran arvin in 2006.JPG Panasonic DMC-L70
- File:Iran arvin 2005-2.JPG Panasonic DMC-L70
- File:Iran arvin 2006-3.JPG Panasonic DMC-L70
- File:Avia-0715-fajr3-2.jpg Panasonic NV-GS300
- File:Simorgh1.gif No meta data
- File:Simorgh(aircraft).jpg No meta data
- File:Iriaf rf 5a 2 7205.jpg No meta data
- File:Aii-co-f.jpg No meta data
- File:AVA-303.jpg No meta data
- File:Shahed 278-shahed industries research centre.jpg Canon EOS 20D
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Utcursch (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 11:23, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- see commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Strumble Head Lighthouse- closeup.jpg Magog the Ogre (talk) 22:15, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:11, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Matthiasfcowley.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).
- File:Johnhenrysmith.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).
- File:Francismlyman.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).
- File:Georgeteasdale.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).
- File:Marrinerwmerrill.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).
- There is no evidence that these images were published prior to 1923. Up loader has a history of bad uploads. Additionally a PD image were uploaded (see: (Cowley), (Smith), (Lyman), (Teasdale) and (Merrill)) so these images are not used any more.--ARTEST4ECHO (talk/contribs) 22:34, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:11, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- see commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Seoul Subway Sadang Station Map.jpg Magog the Ogre (talk) 23:20, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I took this photo during a trip to Korea. sikander (talk) 14:50, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Please read the reasoning at the provided link. Magog the Ogre (talk) 19:03, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:11, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Bashkim Shehu.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Orphan, apparently from Bashkim Shehu. Limited contrib history causes me to doubt copyright status of photo. Kelly hi! 23:22, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:11, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- this was deleted from commons as a copyright violation; I'm not an admin there so I can't see why, although I suspect the local talk page may have some clue. Magog the Ogre (talk) 23:27, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.