Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 February 16
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Contents
- 1 February 16
- 1.1 File:OMQ page title.jpg
- 1.2 File:Old Sparky.jpg
- 1.3 File:Italian Canadians.png
- 1.4 File:Italian Americans.png
- 1.5 File:Hasinawajed.jpg
- 1.6 File:Musaviardebili.jpg
- 1.7 File:DanSoccComm2.jpg
- 1.8 File:DanOSoccComm.jpg
- 1.9 File:USS Wando (1864).jpg
- 1.10 File:USS Jackson 1860.jpg
- 1.11 File:SS James Adger.jpg
- 1.12 File:USS Bienville 1860.jpg
- 1.13 File:USS Harvest Moon 66973.jpg
- 1.14 File:Eva1.jpg
- 1.15 File:20090814 closed van Berkel Pavilion.JPG
- 1.16 File:20090807 Hadid Pavilion at night.jpg
- 1.17 File:PT3 database.jpg
- 1.18 File:20090814 Zaha Hadid pavilion banner during grand opening.JPG
- 1.19 File:Tamer 2006-2007.jpg
- 1.20 File:Lincoln111.jpg
- 1.21 File:Love gift - Calyx krater Aegisthos painter ca 460 BCE.jpg
- 1.22 File:20081117 Barack Obama Streetlight Banner.JPG
- 1.23 File:20081117 Barack Obama Streetsign Banner.JPG
- 1.24 File:20080913 Joffrey Tower Opening Weekend Pointe Shoe Exhibit.JPG
.jpg){kind=link}
February 16
[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Mr.Z-man (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:16, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:OMQ page title.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Image looks like the header to a website; unlikely that the uploader holds the rights. Lәo(βǃʘʘɱ) 01:47, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: No Consensus. -FASTILY (TALK) 00:14, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Old Sparky.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- State government materials are usually protected by copyright, and there appears to be no evidence that this image is in the public domain, lacking a date or any other information that gives such an indication. SchuminWeb (Talk) 03:30, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Appears to be taken in 1926 in the US, but with no copyright notice made=PD. — BQZip01 — talk 05:04, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT⚡ 08:16, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Melesse (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:15, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Italian Canadians.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Contains several non-free images, most notably sourced to Daylife.com, a news service aggregator, whose images are certainly NOT free and are explicitly for commercial use. Mosmof (talk) 04:48, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Melesse (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:15, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Italian Americans.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Image montage with mostly copyvio images Mosmof (talk) 04:58, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Melesse (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 23:14, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Hasinawajed.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Extremely unlikely any image from Daylife would have a free license. Mosmof (talk) 05:17, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Melesse (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:39, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Musaviardebili.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- File appears to be copied from http://www.ardebili.com/Per/Picturs/photogallery/Larg/0008.jpg and uploaded with a false claim of ownership. Eeekster (talk) 08:08, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Melesse (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 23:14, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:DanSoccComm2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Copyrighted image, PD license invalid Mosmof (talk) 11:01, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Melesse (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 23:14, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:DanOSoccComm.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Copyrighted image, PD license invalid Mosmof (talk) 11:01, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 01:30, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
.jpg){kind=link}
- File:USS Wando (1864).jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
.jpg&action=delete&wpReason=%5B%5BWikipedia%3APossibly+unfree+files%2F2010+February+16%23File%3AUSS+Wando+%281864%29.jpg%5D%5D){kind=link}
.jpg&action=history){kind=link}
- This image is being claimed as public domain by virtue of it appearing on the US Navy history website, but the linked page clearly credits Erik Heyl (died 1972?) as the author. First publication was probably in Heyl's Early American Steamers (6 vols, 1953-69), so that this work is not self-evidently in the public domain. There appear to be registrations (here for example) and renewals (here for example) for Heyl's books, so the works are apparently not in the public domain. [Cut and paste from Commons nomination.] Angus McLellan (Talk) 12:53, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- In response to this listing and the four listings below: Please see this page for the statement of use which reads: To the best of our knowledge, all Online Library pictures are in the public domain and can therefore be freely downloaded and used for any purpose without requesting permission. --Brad (talk) 13:51, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Keep; permission located. -FASTILY (TALK) 00:16, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:USS Jackson 1860.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- This image is being claimed as public domain, apparently by virtue of it appearing on the US Navy history website, but the linked page clearly credits Erik Heyl (died 1973) as the author. First publication was probably in Heyl's Early American Steamers (6 vols, 1953-69), so that this work is not self-evidently in the public domain. There appear to be registrations (here for example) and renewals (here for example) for Heyl's books. Angus McLellan (Talk) 12:58, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:30, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:SS James Adger.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- This image is being claimed as public domain, apparently by virtue of it appearing on the US Navy history website, but the linked page clearly credits Erik Heyl (died 1973) as the author. First publication was probably in Heyl's Early American Steamers (6 vols, 1953-69), so that this work is not self-evidently in the public domain. There appear to be registrations (here for example) and renewals (here for example) for Heyl's books. Angus McLellan (Talk) 13:00, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: did you ask the Navy's Online Library about this? They clearly believe that the Erik Heyl images are PD: "To the best of our knowledge, all images referenced in the Online Library are in the Public Domain. They can be used by anyone, for any purpose, without obtaining our permission and without payment of usage fees." [1]. They could be mistaken, of course, but it's a strong statement. --Pete Tillman (talk) 19:18, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Keep; permission located. -FASTILY (TALK) 00:22, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:USS Bienville 1860.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- This image is being claimed as public domain, apparently by virtue of it appearing on the US Navy history website, but the linked page clearly credits Erik Heyl (died 1973) as the author. First publication was probably in Heyl's Early American Steamers (6 vols, 1953-69), so that this work is not self-evidently in the public domain. There appear to be registrations (here for example) and renewals (here for example) for Heyl's books. Angus McLellan (Talk) 13:02, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Keep; permission located. -FASTILY (TALK) 00:24, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:USS Harvest Moon 66973.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- This image is being claimed as public domain, apparently by virtue of it appearing on the US Navy history website, but the linked page clearly credits Erik Heyl (died 1973) as the author. First publication was probably in Heyl's Early American Steamers (6 vols, 1953-69), so that this work is not self-evidently in the public domain. There appear to be registrations (here for example) and renewals (here for example) for Heyl's books. Angus McLellan (Talk) 13:14, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Melesse (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 23:14, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Eva1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Since the Mars Society, who sponsors the Mars Analogue program that this photo represents, is not a part of NASA, and the purported photographer Charles Frankel is not an employee of NASA, this PD-NASA license is almost certainly impossible. I've been unable to locate this particular photo elsewhere. — Huntster (t @ c) 13:35, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Keep; file is tagged as non-free. -FASTILY (TALK) 00:26, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Sculpture located in US (which does NOT have FOP for artworks) Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:19, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT⚡ 08:16, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Keep; file is tagged as non-free. -FASTILY (TALK) 00:26, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Sculpture located in the US (Which does not have FOP) Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:22, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT⚡ 08:16, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nomination withdrawn. Angus McLellan (Talk) 16:27, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:PT3 database.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Self created claim on non-free screenshot Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:25, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Resolved with uploader directly - Nom withdrawn Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:53, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Keep; file is tagged as non-free. -FASTILY (TALK) 00:27, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- 2D art - Located in US which does not have FOP Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:40, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT⚡ 08:16, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Melesse (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 23:14, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Tamer 2006-2007.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- No information on author, appears to be a screenshot Mosmof (talk) 16:43, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete. -FASTILY (TALK) 00:31, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Lincoln111.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- File:Lincoln2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- File:Tigersoftallahassee.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- File:Tigersofside.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- File:Tigersauditorium.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Unlikely to be the work of the uploader. I have had some discussion with the uploader at User talk:Jayebook#Image uploads. It appears it is a photograph of another photograph, raising derivative work issues. They may be in the public domain but the exact source is unclear. Some input from those familiar with U.S. copyright law relating to expiry of copyright would be great. Camaron · Christopher · talk 17:49, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I have combined the nomination of all these photographs as the issue is the same for all of them. Camaron · Christopher · talk 19:15, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Keep. -FASTILY (TALK) 00:28, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- This image, added by a user now banned, claims permission to PD release it was obtained by an email exchange between the uploader and a museum representative. But both names have been deliberately omitted. I think an WP:OTRS ticket is necessary in such cases per Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission#When permission is confirmed. Pcap ping 21:24, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Anything created 2500+ years ago is PD. — BQZip01 — talk 05:08, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- http://www.e x a m i n e r.com/x-14795-Page-One-Examiner~y2009m7d12-Wikipedia-might-get-sued-by-the-National-Portrait-Gallery (remove spaces to defeat lame spam filter) Hopefully, so. The image is probably copyrighted in Germany, but not in the US. Probably nobody is going to complain about this one. Pcap ping 06:04, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Keep; file is tagged as non-free. -FASTILY (TALK) 00:27, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- 2D art - Located in US (which does not have FoP) Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:57, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT⚡ 08:16, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:30, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- 2d art located in US (which does not have FoP) Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:06, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:30, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:20080913 Joffrey Tower Opening Weekend Pointe Shoe Exhibit.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Dress is 3D artwork... Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:51, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.