Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2009 March 15
Contents
March 15
[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:45, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Unable to find GFDL/CC at source. — neuro(talk) 01:05, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:09, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
City logo tagged as user-created. I doubt it. (ESkog)(Talk) 05:09, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:45, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
States "taken from t.v", so the uploader is not the copyright holder. — neuro(talk) 13:08, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:45, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
States "taken from t.v", so the uploader is not the copyright holder — neuro(talk) 13:08, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:45, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Copyrighted school logo, highly unlikely that uploader is copyright holder. — neuro(talk) 13:11, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
School logo is made exclusively by the uploader. smsanch (// talk) 13:40, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- That makes it a derivative work. Million_Moments (talk) 20:52, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Logo already exists at File:Tcnhs logo.png, which was improperly tagged. I've retagged that image. This one needs to go as effectively a replicate. --Hammersoft (talk) 20:59, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:45, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Probable violation of source image at http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=23hrmki&s=5&hid=181&tag=robert+pattinson. Attempted replacement of verified free-content image File:Robert Pattinson.jpg, and thus unneeded anyway. --Hammersoft (talk) 20:04, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:09, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
User created this image of the University of Nottingham sheild themselves, but this surely makes it a derivative work Million_Moments (talk) 20:48, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The university is old enough that their coat of arms would certainly be in the public domain. Derivitatives of public domain works may be re-licenced as free. IronGargoyle (talk) 17:58, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Please note that the user is no longer active on Wikipedia. --TheDJ (talk • contribs) 02:13, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The university didn't get it's charter til 1948 and I don't know at what point the university actually gained it's crest. Does anybody know when this crest was designed? Million_Moments (talk) 08:52, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.