Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Fractyl

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete.  Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 11:47, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

User:Fractyl & User:AlienX2009/Future Tokusatsu Info

Relisted. Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 00:09, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

User:Fractyl (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User:AlienX2009/Future Tokusatsu Info (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User:AlienX2009/Kamen Rider Meteor (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Added this page, which redirects to User:AlienX2009/Future Tokusatsu Info and which contains WP:FAKEARTICLE violating content its history. Added by User:Cunard on 08:10, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

I am well acquainted with the fact that editors are allowed to use their userspace however they want. However this page has been abused for the past year as being an incubator for content for at least 12 different articles, rather than having an intent for this to be a place to test edits or to turn into one singular article. The fact that I entered into an edit war with someone who is not the user the page belongs to (I have self reverted to his preferred version) has just made me realize even more that we do not need this page like this on the project.

If deletion is not a valid option, it should be blanked much more than what I originally cut out late last night, which I've been told is so it can be copied from here and pasted into the relevant article. —Ryulong (竜龙) 00:36, 25 December 2011 (UTC)

Then why not use my page for this information, since I've been doing most of the edits. That way I don't need to abuse Fractyl's user page and do whatever he wants. ~Marvelous2011~ ( ★ AlienX2009 ★ ) 00:39, 25 December 2011 (UTC)

I'm fairly certain that this is subverting the MFD.—Ryulong (竜龙) 00:43, 25 December 2011 (UTC)

Well, I don't care. I don't want any of this removed. ~Marvelous2011~ ( ★ AlienX2009 ★ ) 00:49, 25 December 2011 (UTC)

• Note: AlienX2009 removed all of the content I wanted to be deleted off to his own userspace, as seen in these edits: User:Fractyl User:AlienX2009/Future_Tokusatsu_Info. I'm not sure how to reformat this now.—Ryulong (竜龙) 00:46, 25 December 2011 (UTC)

  I've listed AlienX2009's page in this MFD as well, now.—Ryulong (竜龙) 01:03, 25 December 2011 (UTC)

  Why? ~Marvelous2011~ ( ★ AlienX2009 ★ ) 01:05, 25 December 2011 (UTC)

  Because you moved everything I thought that was wrong with Fractyl's userpage into your usersubspace.—Ryulong (竜龙) 01:07, 25 December 2011 (UTC)

  We've been doing this for years now since what? Kamen Rider Decade or W?. We had no problems with it, and thers not even any descriptions any more. ~Marvelous2011~ ( ★ AlienX2009 ★ ) 01:11, 25 December 2011 (UTC)

  It went out of control, it needs to go, and I am not answering you, again, regarding this deletion. The next time I will edit this page it will be after someone other than you or Fractyl does so.—Ryulong (竜龙) 01:18, 25 December 2011 (UTC)

  KEEP: This user page also happens to link to the my other wiki-related projects. But I allowed this so that this information would not need to be put on the talk pages of respective pages. Furthermore, as the user transfered the info off my page, there is no more need for it to be deleted.Fractyl (talk) 02:52, 25 December 2011 (UTC)

  You'll be able to recreate your userpage. Just without all the crap that AlienX2009 and me took off of it.—Ryulong (竜龙) 03:50, 25 December 2011 (UTC)

• Weak delete for AlienX2009's page, because it's old (yes, its history only goes back to the 3rd, but it's based on much older content from the other page). Neutral for the other one. I would like to note that I find the "12 articles in 1 place" argument particularly unconvincing; if a user wants to organize their work like that, it's up to them. --NYKevin @828, i.e. 18:52, 26 December 2011 (UTC)

---

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 00:09, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

---

• Delete all three WP:UP#COPIES states: "Userspace is not a free web host and should not be used to indefinitely host pages that look like articles, old revisions, or deleted content, or your preferred version of disputed content. Private copies of pages that are being used solely for long-term archival purposes may be subject to deletion..

  Because these pages violate WP:UP#COPIES and WP:NOTWEBHOST, they should be deleted. Cunard (talk) 08:10, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

• Ryulong (talk · contribs)'s comments that these pages are used not for building articles but for the "long-term archival purposes" from WP:UP#COPIES compel me to support deletion. Cunard (talk) 08:10, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.