Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:SAARC

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Keep GFOLEY FOUR!22:20, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Portal:SAARC (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Note: incomplete nomination. — Train2104 (talk • contribs) 19:12, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dead portal. Only 7 edits since 2007. Almost all edits till that time was by just one editor. Aditya(talkcontribs) 12:38, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • keep no valid reason for deletion - old is not a valid reason for deletion. Does look on sided though. All that needs done is some updating...I will help after reading more on the topic at hand(may take a few days).Moxy (talk) 19:38, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep due to no valid reason for deletion. Portals (at least those designed well) do necessarily not require constant updates or changes. This portal is extremely broad in scope, so there is certainly plenty of articles to link to and other information which can be used to expand it. As it is, though, it's still fine to keep. ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 00:10, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.