Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2022 July 19

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

July 19

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. plicit 02:18, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Skipper Barbie animated.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Lagoona Blue (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

The stated purpose of this non-free image is "to demonstrate the distinctive style of the Barbie TV series depicting Skipper", but there is no significant sourced critical commentary about the image. Fails WP:NFCC#8. Whpq (talk) 02:50, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: I just added a paragraph commenting about the style of the animated version with a source to AWN. I copied the image purpose from File:Optimusprime-animated.jpg but still think it applies since it shows how the Barbie characters were given their new "realistic and modern CGI look" for the TV series as mentioned in the news article. Going over NFCC, I think one image showing the animated design is OK. Lagoona Blue (talk) 14:51, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2022 July 26. (non-admin closure)Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 03:12, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Winx Club main characters cast.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:03, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:UserGarikAvakian.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Գարիկ Ավագյան (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Unused personal photo. Out of scope. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 15:21, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:03, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:UserGarikAvakian1.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Գարիկ Ավագյան (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Unused personal photo. Out of scope. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 15:21, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:03, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Uriparty logo.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Steviecnd (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Superseded by File:Logo of the Uri Party (2006, Sign only).svg. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 15:22, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: CC-BY-NC is never an acceptable license on enwp. No prejudice to restoration if someone can a) produce evidence proving that this is PD, or b) create a valid fair-use claim for this image -FASTILY 00:50, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:VP Ballroom 1937.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by BeenAroundAWhile (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Source website indicates a non-commercial license. The photograph was taken in 1937 and may be in public domain for other reasons, but this requires evidence. Image is not used anywhere. Ixfd64 (talk) 17:08, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am not sure what the problem is. The image is used at Veiled Prophet Parade and Ball#Ball location and duration. Here are the terms: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/
Kindly explain better. Thank you. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 17:18, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@BeenAroundAWhile: We prefer to use free media whenever possible, and only resort to fair use if a free alternative could not be found. A non-commercial restriction is not compatible with our definition of a free license. Please see Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria for more information. The image in question is not used anywhere and therefore does not qualify for fair use. Ixfd64 (talk) 22:01, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:03, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Forthrail23.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Kharasho (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Unused derivative work of non-free image. [1] Ixfd64 (talk) 17:16, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: no consensus on whether the fact that this 2D art was on a vase is enough to put it under 3D art restrictions. (non-admin closure)Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 19:00, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Love gift - Calyx krater Aegisthos painter ca 460 BCE.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Haiduc (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Since the photograph is of a three-dimensional work of art, copyright would apply to any photographs that were taken of the subject. While it is possible that the copyright was released, that requires confirmation. There is no evidence that the stated interaction occurred. It is also too recent to be a grandfathered old file. ―Susmuffin Talk 19:00, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.