Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2022 January 25

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

< Wikipedia:Files for discussion

Jump to navigation Jump to search

< January 24	January 26 >

January 25

File:Joaquin Domaso online press conference.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: speedy delete as author request. ✗plicit 12:00, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Joaquin Domaso online press conference.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by 7starunited (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Joaquin Domagoso is alive I think? Fails Wikipedia:Non-free content#Images 2. — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 12:58, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, Joaquin Domagoso is alive and the image I uploaded was just taken recently at his online press conference and it is placed in the description of the image I think there is nothing wrong because I followed the guidelines on the correct size of non-free media.7starunited (talk) 23:49, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

7starunited, as a general rule, non-free content is only allowed when a free replacement could not be made. Since Joaquin is alive and well, someone could take a new photo of him and license the photo freely. — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 04:39, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Alexis Jazz Ok thanks i understand now, sorry for misunderstunding.7starunited (talk) 05:52, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That means, 7starunited, you switch to favoring deletion, right? George Ho (talk) 09:55, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes i change my vote to Delete

7starunited (talk) 10:00, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Cobalt handle.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cobalt handle.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Greg L (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Unused screenshot of non-free software. Ixfd64 (talk) 17:54, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 02:08, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- I created the image but didn't end up using in in the article. Go ahead and delete. Greg L (talk) 05:18, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Cobalt UI.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cobalt UI.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Odysseus1111 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Unused screenshot of non-free software. Ixfd64 (talk) 17:55, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 02:09, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:1975 NBA All-Star Game.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:1975 NBA All-Star Game.svg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Tk421mesa (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

This is a non-free logo that was vectorized by the uploader. Per WP:NFC: ... editors who upload vector images of non-free logos should use a vector image that was produced by the copyright holder of the logo... SVG files should not be created without authorization from the logo's copyright holder. – Pbrks ^(t • c) 18:55, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, per nom. House Blaster^talk 04:17, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Little Mix - Heartbreak Anthem (music video screenshot).jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Little Mix - Heartbreak Anthem (music video screenshot).jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by GabbyMix01 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Per WP:NFCC copyright images must be used sparingly and where they convey information that is not otherwise easily identified, or adds significantly for identification e.g. the infobox. In this case, there is no rational provided as to why the image is necessary to convey the costume or stylings of the artist. The image also fails on the grounds of being high quality, non-free images should be provided at the minimum acceptable quality to convey the information they are being used to show. In this HQ screen capture from the music video, this clearly steps outside of the boundaries of reasonable copyright per WP:NFCC. Images and screen captures from a music video are not guaranteed or a given certainty. ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 21:05, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Little Mix - Wings screenshot.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Little Mix - Wings screenshot.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Nightclubbing (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Per WP:NFCC copyright images must be used sparingly and where they convey information that is not otherwise easily identified, or adds significantly for identification e.g. the infobox. In this case, there is no rational provided as to why the image is necessary. The image also fails on the grounds of being high quality, non-free images should be provided at the minimum acceptable quality to convey the information they are being used to show. In this HQ screen capture from the music video, this clearly steps outside of the boundaries of reasonable copyright per WP:NFCC. Images and screen captures from a music video are not guaranteed or a given certainty. ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 21:14, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep because there is enough critical commentary about the music video to justify its inclusion. Aspects (talk) 23:52, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Near the end of the video, the group are accompanied by male backing dancers for a hip hop and chair dance routine in front of a backdrop resembling the Union Jack. The sentence provides the same context as the screenshot, and the quoted sentence is not that hard to understand and to convey without the screenshot. Furthermore, per WP:FREER and/or WP:NFC#CS, the screenshot may be replaceable by text and/or doesn't improve understanding of the music video (which is not the main article subject) or the song.
Also, unless at least one "keep" vote is an adequate proof, or unless identifying members of the girl group in the screenshot is sufficient proof, I haven't yet seen definitive proof that omitting the screenshot harms understanding of something under discussion. Or are the words and names too complex for readers to understand, and do editors not trust free text's ability to sufficiently help readers convey info about the music video and its scenes? The assumption that readers won't understand the words without the screenshot and keeping the image based on the assumption are very worrying. --George Ho (talk) 00:43, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:C. J. and Talmidge Cregg on "The Long Goodbye".jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:C. J. and Talmidge Cregg on "The Long Goodbye".jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Theleekycauldron (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Screenshot merely shows two characters in a scene. Can be easily conveyed in text. Also, the image itself doesn't provide understanding of the episode. May not be contextually significant. George Ho (talk) 21:57, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Museum of the Bible.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Museum of the Bible.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Jgefd (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Low quality with transparency artifacts that has been replaced in the article making it an orphan; better quality and transparent versions of the logo are provided by the museum at https://www.museumofthebible.org/logos and are suitable for Commons uploading. 9³ (talk) 22:17, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Files_for_discussion/2022_January_25&oldid=1109731516"