Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2014 July 16

< July 15	July 17 >

July 16

File:Bad World Tour 1988.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is either official tour artwork,(in which case it can't be self) or it's fanart which is generally discouraged. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 00:10, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:MichiganLeftSign.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:MichiganLeftSign.svg is a much higher quality version of the same image, and it is already being hosted on Commons. Imzadi 1979 → 06:02, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mercury Vapour Lamp Spectrum.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, there was seemingly a concern about this being a non-typical spectrum (i.e accuracy dispute.) Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:34, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Chlorophyll a table for organisms.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Should be a table in the article, also tagged "need to verify that this is not a copyvio, and would be substantially more useful as plain text rather than low-res image of plain-text." on image. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:38, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ValentinaIgoshina.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, deemed low quality by another contributor. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:04, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Kraxler (talk) 13:42, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ClaireMarieLeGuay.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, deemed low quality (redeye) by another contributor. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:05, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Kraxler (talk) 13:42, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:M A Varughese and family.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F9 by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:08, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Another contributor tagged - "This image is more appropriate for social media like Facebook but it is not appropriate for Commons because there is no educational use for such an image, especially when there is an existing photo of the subject alone in the infobox of the article." Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:08, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Coat of arms of Sudan pre-1970.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unused , tagged as "low-quality, appears to contain dubiously-free element, SVG has been updated and fulfills the purpose of this image" by another contibutor. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:24, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- Copyright status of rhino depiction is questionable, image was kind of a temporary stopgap to prepare the way for an SVG version (now achieved)... AnonMoos (talk) 05:20, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Cafe Braunerhof.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Blurry image, orphaned. No foreseeable use, so no point moving to Commons. Deadstar (talk) 09:41, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:John Mack Brown.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, No date, No author, (claimed as unknown.) Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:51, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Umair Asif Islamabad writer.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unused- "Used only for self-promotional vanity pages about a non-notable person, and of no value to anyone else." Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:13, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Umair Asif islamabad who is the writer and editor.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unused- "Used only for self-promotional vanity pages about a non-notable person, and of no value to anyone else." Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:13, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Umair ASIF Islamabad writer editor.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unused-"Used only for self-promotional vanity pages about a non-notable person, and of no value to anyone else." Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:13, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Umair Asif pakistan Islamabad.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unused-"Used only for self-promotional vanity pages about a non-notable person, and of no value to anyone else." Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:13, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Umair asif writer editor islamabad.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unused-"Used only for self-promotional vanity pages about a non-notable person, and of no value to anyone else." Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:14, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Umair asif writer editor islamabad PAKISTAN.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unused-"Used only for self-promotional vanity pages about a non-notable person, and of no value to anyone else." Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:14, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Umair-asif-1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unused- "Used only for self-promotional vanity pages about a non-notable person, and of no value to anyone else." Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:16, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Istanbul collage 6a.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Collage image, uploade for test purposes. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:33, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Istanbul collage 6b.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Collage image uploaded for test purposes. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:33, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Istanbul collage 5c.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Collage image . uploaded for test purposes. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:33, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Istanbul collage 5d.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Collage image, uploaded for test purposes. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:34, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Istanbul collage 4c-alt.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Collage image uploaded for test purposes. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:34, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Istanbul collage 5e.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Collage image uploaded for test purposes. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:40, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Umair Asif Image.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unused-"Used only for self-promotional vanity pages about a non-notable person, and of no value to anyone else." Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:09, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Umair Asif Picture123.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unused-"Used only for self-promotional vanity pages about a non-notable person, and of no value to anyone else." Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:10, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Umair asif writer.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep. TLSuda (talk) 00:31, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unused-"Used only for self-promotional vanity pages about a non-notable person, and of no value to anyone else." Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:10, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Not-a-bad-quality image of a photographer overlooking Islamabad; if we had no metadata other than the name of the city, this wouldn't be a problem. If you didn't want the photographer, you could even crop out the entire left side, and you'd have a decent low-level elevated view of parts of Islamabad. It's definitely in scope at Commons, so move there. Nyttend (talk) 13:21, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Camcentrallib hours.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"Opening hours of a group of libraries are not within Commons' scope. This, that and the other (talk) 05:59, 27 December 2011 (UTC) - Commons Delete Request", so out of scope and replacable by text in any event Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:02, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Wikidanesju8.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep.'''TLSuda (talk) 00:33, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Individual status of images not noted on image, and if non-free use of the images in the article in which this appears may not meet the relevant NFCC criteria. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:11, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep All images are PD. See File:Hans Christian Andersen.jpg, File:Niels Bohr.jpg, File:Ørsted.jpg, File:Sweyn.jpg (recent 3D creation, but permitted by the UK's FOP provisions), File:Peter Schmeichel juli 1991.JPG, File:Kierkegaard.jpg, File:Tycho Brahe.JPG, and File:KarenBlixen.jpeg. Nyttend (talk) 13:29, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mechanism of N-acylation using HATU.pdf

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, bad format. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:15, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:CGI Machinima sample film.ogg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope, and only appears in a userspace gallery Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:18, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Stephen Henry Wendover tombstone.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep. Let's try to WP:AGF. TLSuda (talk) 17:52, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"The authenticity of the stone has been questioned. See Talk:Stephen H. Wendover/Archive 1" Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:20, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Kraxler writing sarcastically "I can't see the name "Wendover" on the stone. Would it be possible to point out where it is?" is not the same thing as "The authenticity of the stone has been questioned". There is a family surname stone and individual stones for each family member as clearly shown when you follow the link to Findagrave. He is buried with his parents and siblings who are named in his biography. I tend toward Occam's razor and choose the simplest explanation rather than some doppelganger with the same name but not the subject of the biography is buried in the family plot. Conspiracies are fun to read, but this is an encyclopedia. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 16:19, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and give link to Find a Grave, where the photo of the stone can be seen. No need to upload it from a questionable source. By the way, do you really think that the stone (especially the non-polished part) looks really 125 years old, Richard? See WP:DUCK. Kraxler (talk) 16:39, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
We should insist on seeing his long-form death certificate, I heard he was buried in Kenya. Your "from a questionable source" is incorrect, the proper OTRS was filed by the source. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 21:54, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

(Smile), I'm inclinced to withdraw this nomination.Sfan00 IMG (talk) 00:30, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I bet you the same sheeple believe that the Colossal red granite statue of Amenhotep III is over 3,000 years old. It looks like it was made recently. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 01:31, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm sure the statue of Amenhotep III was made of the same material as Wendover's alleged tombstone and is still standing in the rain in Wisconsin, the ceiling shown in the photo must have been added by some prankster. Well, Richard, I wish you would learn to argue without using well known fallacious techniques, just sticking to the point. Kraxler (talk) 14:33, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  - Do you really think sand is less detrimental to granite than water, or that Amenhotep's statue was protected from the sand for less than 125 years? Anyway you are getting involved in original research, which is forbidden. Find a reference that supports your doppelganger theory and it can be included in the article, until then we have to use Occam's razor and not go into conspiracy theory mode. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 18:38, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Einstein at Complutense.pdf

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:10, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, low quality, Prominent Watermark. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:48, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Gm thumb enquire.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:10, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Image is virtually useless because nothing can be distinguished in it. Cannot find a record of a previous upload. Codename Lisa (talk) 15:55, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Rumford 5.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:10, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Low resolution image, lacking original publication information. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:57, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This image was previously nominated (and kept) at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2012 June 8#File:Rumford_5.jpg. Has something changed since that discussion? - Eureka Lott 18:46, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Vaccarelli.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:10, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Low qulaity, "Please provide original source for image to verify identity. The image has been used online to illustrate Spanish Louis. Deadstar (talk) 14:04, 3 June 2014 (UTC)" tagged on image, so doubts as to subject identifcation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:59, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:STAGE MERRY.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:10, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The link of the source is dead, and cannot comfirm the copyright situation. This is Taiwania Formosania speaking (Give a signature for your words) 16:44, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Otokar Altay MBT.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:10, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCCP #1, "No other free licensed photo of the tank is currently available." is not a valid reason to use a non-free image. eh bien mon prince (talk) 18:32, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2014 July 16

July 16

Navigation menu

Search