Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2014 February 7

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
< February 6 February 8 >

February 7

[edit]

File:Yara Arts Group's "Scythian Stones" (2010).jpg

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Kept - no convincing explanation of why the enacting of the play is copyright though clearly the written play is - Peripitus (Talk) 22:50, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Yara Arts Group's "Scythian Stones" (2010).jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Virlana (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Derivative work of the play in question. MER-C 04:42, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • I don't agree. The play is a literary work, but all literary aspects that you see on this photograph should be below the threshold of originality. On the other hand, it is a derivative work of the thing that the actors are located on. Does that thing count as a bridge? According to Commons:COM:FOP#United States, bridges aren't copyrightable in the United States. --Stefan2 (talk) 14:26, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Yara Arts Group's "Circle" (1999).jpg

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Kept - no convincing explanation of why the enacting of the play is copyright though clearly the written play is - Peripitus (Talk) 22:50, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Yara Arts Group's "Circle" (1999).jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Virlana (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Derivative work of the play in question. MER-C 04:43, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Yara Arts Group's "Flight of the White Bird" (1998).jpg

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Kept - no convincing explanation of why the enacting of the play is copyright though clearly the written play is - Peripitus (Talk) 22:50, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Yara Arts Group's "Flight of the White Bird" (1998).jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Virlana (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Derivative work of the play in question. MER-C 04:43, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • I don't agree. The image is a derivative work of the background (and therefore delete), but not a derivative of the play, since you do not see any creative literary features on the photograph. --Stefan2 (talk) 14:28, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Yara Arts Group's "Virtual Souls" (1996).jpg

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Kept - no convincing explanation of why the enacting of the play is copyright though clearly the written play is - Peripitus (Talk) 22:50, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Yara Arts Group's "Virtual Souls" (1996).jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Virlana (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Derivative work of the play in question. MER-C 04:43, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • I don't agree. Derivative work of the background (but maybe that can be argued to be de mimimis here?), but you don't seem to see any distinct literary features. Not sure if the characters' placement is copyrighted, but that would in that case be a copyvio of the choreography rather than the play. --Stefan2 (talk) 14:30, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Byzantine lyra.png

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:07, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Byzantine lyra.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Stevepeterson (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Unsourced, unused, factually mislabelled. It's not a Byzantine lyra but a western viola da gamba, and the style of the illustration is most obviously not 11th century Byzantine (as claimed by original uploader) but western Renaissance-era. Could be kept if properly sourced and appropriately renamed, but I haven't been able to identify the original provenance so far. Fut.Perf. ☼ 09:50, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:American Horror Story Asylum Promo.jpg

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:07, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:American Horror Story Asylum Promo.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by CAWylie (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Fails WP:NFCC#3a. Stefan2 (talk) 14:24, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ali-Ahmed.jpg

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:07, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ali-Ahmed.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Knsledge (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Used in two articles. Fails WP:NFCC#8 in one of them and WP:NFCC#10c in the other one. Stefan2 (talk) 14:59, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:New SAS EuroBonus membership card - Diamond.png

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:10, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:New SAS EuroBonus membership card - Diamond.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Richlv (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Redundant to File:EuroBonus-cards.jpg, see WP:NFCC#3a. Stefan2 (talk) 15:31, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

cards image does not include diamond card, only first 3 levels. for example, diamond card image shows that it still prints "star alliance gold" on the card. --Richlv (talk) 15:40, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
There is no discussion about diamond cards, though. See WP:NFCC#3a: showing just one card would be sufficient. --Stefan2 (talk) 15:49, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Novels by Isabel Ashdown.jpg

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:07, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Novels by Isabel Ashdown.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Bookybook100 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Fails WP:NFCC#8: book covers shouldn't be used in the article about the author, see footnote to WP:NFCI §1. Stefan2 (talk) 16:26, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Glasshopper by Isabel Ashdown.gif

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Mark Arsten (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Glasshopper by Isabel Ashdown.gif (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Bookybook100 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Fails WP:NFCC#8: book covers shouldn't be used in the article about the author, see footnote to WP:NFCI §1. Stefan2 (talk) 16:26, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Hurry Up and Wait by Isabel Ashdown.gif

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Mark Arsten (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hurry Up and Wait by Isabel Ashdown.gif (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Bookybook100 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Fails WP:NFCC#8: book covers shouldn't be used in the article about the author, see footnote to WP:NFCI §1. Stefan2 (talk) 16:27, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Files_for_deletion/2014_February_7&oldid=1074090709"