Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2013 March 8

< March 7	March 9 >

March 8

File:The Hangover Soundtrack.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by DeltaQuad (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The uploader is currently retired, so notifying him is unnecessary. As for the image, it is very redundant to the film poster, and is not subject to critical commentary. George Ho (talk) 00:01, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ensemble-OS-Logo.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unused logo. The corresponding article was deleted in 2009 for a lack of notability; see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ensemble (operating system). —Bkell (talk) 00:03, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Five map images

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Deleted. Dianna (talk) 01:19, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Free file can easily be found; exemption does not apply; see also discusssion at Wikipedia:Village_pump_(policy)#Problems permalink Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 00:05, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete See my arguments in the prior discussion at WP:VPP#Problems. --Stefan2 (talk) 00:07, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File_talk:Doc_balt_flot1.jpg Keep. It is not a geographical map (there is not no mountains or rivers or forests or other geographical elements), it is map of the military facilities. This is the result work of several experts, that an outsider can not to repeat. it Contour region with scheme location military facilities. Besides military facilities represent special characters, so can no redraw. Replaceability No. Openstreetmap such maps does no. These signs are the author's work, their redrawing the image does not do free. Vyacheslav84 (talk) 08:40, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - There is no "sweat of the brow" standard in copyright - the underlying facts of the map (where cities and military installations were/are located) are not subject to copyright. Someone, using the same data used to generate these maps, could make their own, even if they are not an expert in the field. Any map that has an underlying reality (IE, it's not a map of the Lord of the Rings universe) is always going to be replaceable because reality is not subject to copyright. --B (talk) 15:40, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- If the location of military properties per this trivial fact, the maps are free. But the contours of geographical objects themselves are not protected by avtorskim right - As a result of the court decisions, following parts of a map are in the public domain, and may be used freely: ... Geographic or topographic features. Those are facts, and facts aren't copyrightable Vyacheslav84 (talk) 22:39, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  - Please note, the information in the maps is free, but the expression (the map itself) is not free. That is, you can create your own map using the same information, but with different layout, color scheme, choice of ways to represent the information, etc. The choice someone makes in how to represent free information is a copyrightable, creative thing. Because of this, anyone could create new maps which are wholly original and contain the same information. That's why these need to be deleted. You should familiarize yourself with the Idea–expression divide, which is where I think you are having a problem. The idea (the location of military facilities in a geographic area) is perfectly free and not copyrightable. The expression (a specific map created by a specific person who makes creative decisions in how he makes it) is copyrightable. --Jayron32 00:27, 10 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note - I merged all of these entries together rather than have forked discussions. Prior to the merge, Stefan2 had only commented on the first, but from context, I assume it was intended to apply to all of them. Vyacheslav84 had posted the identical content at all of them. --B (talk) 15:45, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Maps consist of two parts: the location of military installations signs and topographic contour. 1. From topographic contours of a solution Wikimedia - As a result of the court decisions, following parts of a map are in the public domain, and may be used freely: ... Geographic or topographic features. Those are facts, and facts aren't copyrightable 2. Location of military facilities we must to redraw the hair in exactly with the original maps, so this is pure copypaste. Vyacheslav84 (talk) 04:41, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

- - Well, the map isn't in English, so I'm assuming it wasn't first published in the US? (Unless it's changed recently, wasn't there a decree from Jimbo awhile back that we don't use something unless it's PD both here and in the country of origin? I seem to remember this arising with Iran or somewhere that we didn't have copyright relations with.) Also, even if the boundaries are not copyrightable, there is creativity in what symbols are used to depict the military installations, the text that is displayed, etc. So, from the link you gave (which I was not aware of that), if this were just a simple map with some minimalistic information, it would not be copyrightable, but there's clearly other stuff on the map. --B (talk) 06:48, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    - ru:Файл:Doc balt flot1.jpg All language versions of Wikipedia operating under the laws of the United States (Russian Wikipedia at least accurately, but Iran I do not know) - at the location of servers. but there's clearly other stuff on the map - What? There only facts on the contour geograficheskroy maps. Location of military facilities is not thought author, but is a real fact.Those are facts, and facts aren't copyrightable. Vyacheslav84 (talk) 07:00, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
      - No, the icons on the map are not facts. There are planes, tanks, boats, missile launchers, and a few other icons. Those icons are arranged in a certain way. There are lines drawn from each city to labels that presumably are telling you the ordinances in that city. There are numerous ways that you could put that information down on this map - they chose this way. A standard for threshold of creativity is if two people skilled in the art showed you the same work and both said, "I did this", would it be obvious that one of them is lying? For example, if you and I both set out to draw a red circle, we might both come up with something like File:Red circle.svg independent of each other. There's no threshold of originality. But if two people start with the same blank map and wanted to indicate the locations of military facilities on that map, they wouldn't both come up with the same map we see here. If they did, you'd know that one of them copied the other. --B (talk) 07:39, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
        There are numerous ways that you could put that information down on this map - they chose this way. - Military facilities may location can only be in one place and nowhere else. If Tank Regiment Set in Kaliningrad, then we can not move Tank Regiment to Baltiysk. We can not change the location of the object. And the location linked to the map and grid cities, so we, too, can not be changed. My response: Use blue and yellow squares instead of the signs, and you immediately get PD-trivial. I am not sure way I should repeat it for the third time.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:49, 8 March 2013 (UTC) Proposal instead of special symbols used triangles squares and circles equivalent ideas in mathematics instead of an infinity sign to use the - cross, instead of a plus - circle, instead of the integral - triangle. Vyacheslav84 (talk) 19:23, 8 March 2013 (UTC). These signs are not the author's invention, but the conventional notation military facilities (such as a special notation in mathematics and physics). Do you offer special notation in physics or mathematics substitute circles, triangles or squares? Vyacheslav84 (talk) 11:10, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
        There are numerous ways to draw an icon of a surface to air missile launcher or a battleship or whatever those icons are. There are numerous ways the icons could have been ordered or displayed around their respective cities. If you throw out the background and just consider the foreground - [1] - it's obvious that I copied that image from the map ... we wouldn't have both come up with it on our own. It clearly passes a threshold of creativity. If those icons are a common convention in the public domain with no more creativity than a plus sign, can you point to other maps made by different people that use the identical icons? --B (talk) 16:20, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete copied directly from a copyrighted work, easily replaceable with an equivalent free work. Slam dunk WP:NFCC violation. --Jayron32 00:22, 10 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Wonder how they are replaceable if redraws is accurate (complete) copivio? If the replacement, you do not specify a problem analogous to the free maps? Vyacheslav84 (talk) 12:17, 10 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all replaceable so they all fail WP:NFCC. LGA _talk^edits 00:43, 10 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Wonder how they are replaceable if redraws is accurate (complete) copivio? If the replacement, you do not specify a problem analogous to the free maps? Vyacheslav84 (talk) 12:17, 10 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  - I think B has answered that above. LGA _talk^edits 12:21, 10 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
As a result of the court decisions, following parts of a map are in the public domain, and may be used freely:...Place names. Those aren't copyrightable. Colors. For example, the colors representing area features on a topographic map, such as vegetation (green), water (blue), and densely built-up areas (gray or red). Colors aren't copyrightable, either. Symbols and map keys Can't be protected by copyright, even if the mapmaker invented truly original ones...facts aren't copyrightable. Elements copied from other maps (say, from a public domain USGS map). Whatever new information the mapmaker added will be protected by copyright (the selection, arrangement of the info), but the elements that were copied (the elements of a USGS map used as a starting point, for example) will stay in the public domain. Based on this rule maps free: 1. location of military objects - this is a facts. 2. Icons (Symbols and map keys) of military objects are not protected by copyright. 3. The colors are not protected by copyright. 4. Contours are at similar free maps. Vyacheslav84 (talk) 12:36, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- "Based on this rule cards free". I have no idea what that means. "Icons of military facilities are not protected by copyright." Just saying it doesn't make it so. The legal standard is that you are violating copyright if "an average lay observer would recognize the alleged copy as having been appropriated from the copyrighted work." If someone sees the same icons in the same order, it's obvious that you've copied the work. Two people wouldn't come up with it independently. --B (talk) 16:09, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  - "Icons of military facilities are not protected by copyright." - Symbols and map keys Can't be protected by copyright, even if the mapmaker invented truly original ones. You against rules of Wikimedia? Vyacheslav84 (talk) 16:15, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    - That's talking about things like †‡#, etc - normal footnote symbols that you see. Anything that is simple typeface is not protected by copyright. --B (talk) 16:19, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
      - This is your personal interpretation. "even if the mapmaker invented truly original ones." - it is clearly not the only †‡#, but all symbols. Vyacheslav84 (talk) 16:20, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  - "Based on this rule cards free. I have no idea what that means." - map are in the public domain, and may be used freely Vyacheslav84 (talk) 16:29, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    - - Well, no, your interpretation is clearly flawed. Using your standard, if someone were to put a photo of Barack Obama on a map, that photo automatically becomes public domain. That's absurd. And besides, courts in a similar case disagree with you. "But the evidence in this case demonstrates that Mason exercised sufficient creativity when he created his maps. In his deposition and affidavit, Mason explained the choices that he independently made to select information from numerous and sometimes conflicting sources, and to depict that information on his maps.10 Mason's compilation of the information on his maps involved creativity that far exceeds the required minimum level." The court found that there was creativity involved in " each mapmaker's selection of sources, interpretation of those sources, discretion in reconciling inconsistencies among the sources, and skill and judgment in depicting the information." In other words, even if you were to accept that every individual element is public domain, all of the elements together are not. The outline of the state of Texas or a simple map showing geographic borders has no copyright protection (merely an embodiment of facts). But this map is far more than an embodiment of facts. Mason v Montgomery Data et al 1992 --B (talk) 23:29, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
        In the rule Wikimedia this aspect (nuance) NO, although they are very careful (attentive) to the author law (law of copyright protection). Vyacheslav84 (talk) 05:17, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
We can change on the maps free license: As a result of the court decisions, following parts of a map are in the public domain, and may be used freely:...Place names. Those aren't copyrightable. Colors. For example, the colors representing area features on a topographic map, such as vegetation (green), water (blue), and densely built-up areas (gray or red). Colors aren't copyrightable, either. Symbols and map keys Can't be protected by copyright, even if the mapmaker invented truly original ones...facts aren't copyrightable. Elements copied from other maps (say, from a public domain USGS map). Whatever new information the mapmaker added will be protected by copyright (the selection, arrangement of the info), but the elements that were copied (the elements of a USGS map used as a starting point, for example) will stay in the public domain. Based on this rule maps free: 1. location of military objects - this is a facts. 2. Icons (Symbols and map keys) of military objects are not protected by copyright. 3. The colors are not protected by copyright. 4. Contours are at similar free maps. {{PD-Art}} Vyacheslav84 (talk) 06:42, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- You just keep saying the same thing over and over again, but just saying it doesn't make it so. The public domain elements of a map are only those that are embodiments of facts that involve no creativity. Please read the excerpts from the court ruling that I quoted - if the mapmaker exercised creativity in selecting sources of information and exercising skill and judgment in depicting the information, then it's copyrightable. --B (talk) 12:03, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  - In the rule Wikimedia this aspect (nuance) NO, although they are very careful (attentive) to the author law (law of copyright protection). Vyacheslav84 (talk) 05:17, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
has benefited more than a thousand Russian and foreign media, analytical reports and reviews, as well as other publications and online resources. - Judging by the passage generalization secondary sources without creative work - http://www.kommersant.ru/doc/380961/print. Vyacheslav84 (talk) 12:15, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Then you have to correct rule Wikimedia - http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Derivative_works#Maps , because according under this rule the decision to delete the maps or not. If you think it is against the law, it is necessary to speak with the leadership Wikimedia (not write here). Otherwise it what are you complaining by federal law to the sheriff of a small town. Vyacheslav84 (talk) 04:37, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Mason v Montgomery Data et al 1992 - Well, then, prove that different sources in this matter are contradictory and maps made by the creative work to identify and correct deficiencies. Vyacheslav84 (talk) 12:36, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Are you using Google Translate to post these things? I don't understand what you are saying. The court case is very relevant to this image. I'm not clear on what your argument is. Only simple map elements are public domain. This image is very clearly more than just simple elements. --B (talk) 12:53, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  - Only simple map elements are public domain. This image is very clearly more than just simple elements. - If the simple elements (parts) maps are free, the map as a whole may be not free? Map consists of simple elements. Vyacheslav84 (talk) 13:11, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  - Well, I read the decision vessels and understood this logic. If there is a choice of what to display on the map and what not to display this author's work. If such a choice is not, it is the facts not protected by copyright. But in this case there was no choose what to display on the map - the location of military bases is independent of the author of the map. Sorry for the poor English. Vyacheslav84 (talk) 13:20, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This court concluded that that idea merged with Kern River's expression because there was only one way to effectively express that idea. - other methods / options placement military facilities no. Vyacheslav84 (talk) 12:51, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- That was a different case. In that case - Kern River Gas Transmission Co. v. Coastal Corp - the underlying map was a government survey map (indisputably public domain) and the ONLY thing added to it was a route of a proposed gas line. Since there was no other way to depict that proposed route, the use was found not to be infringing. That's clearly not the case here because there are plenty of ways that you can depict information about military installations. --B (talk) 15:10, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Comicmac.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, unencyclopedic. Kelly ^hi! 03:18, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Commander Schoep.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, unencyclopedic. Kelly ^hi! 03:19, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:CommunesMap.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:11, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Obsolete map. Kelly ^hi! 03:20, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Move to commons perfectly usable blank map -- 65.92.180.137 (talk) 05:51, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- More to the point, this one looks like it might be the (unattributed) source for File:Communes of France.png. I will move it to Commons. --B (talk) 18:23, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Community Justice logo.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, unencyclopedic. Kelly ^hi! 03:21, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:COMP-ANGLESfile4445.GIF

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Obsolete diagram. Kelly ^hi! 03:24, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Comparison of Opera 8.51 and Mozilla Firefox 1.5 on Acid2.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned screencap. Kelly ^hi! 03:25, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:COMPDRGN2.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, unencyclopedic. Kelly ^hi! 03:25, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Composition1.web1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, unencyclopedic. Kelly ^hi! 03:26, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Compound base conv cont.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned textimage. Kelly ^hi! 03:26, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Compound base conv.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned textimage. Kelly ^hi! 03:27, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Computer lab(1).jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, unencyclopedic. Kelly ^hi! 03:28, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Computer Specialists - Trend in demand.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned graph. Kelly ^hi! 03:29, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Concept diagram.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned textimage. Kelly ^hi! 03:29, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Concept Plan For Lantau.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned map, unclear source/permission. Kelly ^hi! 03:30, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Concordia Example logo.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, unencyclopedic. Kelly ^hi! 03:31, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Conditional-gate.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Obsolete diagram. Kelly ^hi! 03:32, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Conductor.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, low resolution. Kelly ^hi! 03:33, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Conelrad promo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, unencyclopedic. Kelly ^hi! 03:33, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ConfederacionPeruanaBolivianadiv.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Obsolete map. Kelly ^hi! 03:34, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Conformers2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Obsolete diagram. Kelly ^hi! 03:35, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:CongressionalDistrict-TX1-2004.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:08, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Obsolete map. Kelly ^hi! 03:36, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Move to commons -- 65.92.180.137 (talk) 05:48, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- If you really want to move these to Commons (where they will be utterly useless - we will NEVER have a need for a map of an old congressional district), then move them to Commons. But don't ask someone else to do busy work. --B (talk) 12:07, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:CongressionalDistrict-TX1.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:08, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Obsolete map. Kelly ^hi! 03:37, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Move to commons -- 65.92.180.137 (talk) 05:48, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:CongressionalDistrict-TX2.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:08, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Obsolete map. Kelly ^hi! 03:37, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Move to commons -- 65.92.180.137 (talk) 05:48, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:CongressionalDistrict-TX3.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:08, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Obsolete map. Kelly ^hi! 03:38, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Move to commons -- 65.92.180.137 (talk) 05:48, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:CongressionalDistrict-TX4.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:08, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Obsolete map. Kelly ^hi! 03:38, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Move to commons -- 65.92.180.137 (talk) 05:48, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:CongressionalDistrict-TX5.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:08, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Obsolete map. Kelly ^hi! 03:39, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Move to commons -- 65.92.180.137 (talk) 05:48, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:CongressionalDistrict-TX6.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:08, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Obsolete map. Kelly ^hi! 03:39, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Move to commons -- 65.92.180.137 (talk) 05:47, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:CongressionalDistrict-TX7.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:08, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Obsolete map. Kelly ^hi! 03:40, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Move to commons -- 65.92.180.137 (talk) 05:47, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:CongressionalDistrict-TX8.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:08, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Obsolete map. Kelly ^hi! 03:40, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Move to commons -- 65.92.180.137 (talk) 05:46, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Connecticut Highway 19.png & File:Connecticut Highway 25.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: deleted --B (talk) 18:30, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned sign image. Kelly ^hi! 03:42, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Move to commons -- 65.92.180.137 (talk) 05:44, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete. I uploaded these, but didn't realize they've since been replaced with SVG images. No reason to have the png's. (Also, I morphed the two; reasoning will be the same for both.) Jared (t) 13:15, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Connector corners.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Obsolete diagram. Kelly ^hi! 03:44, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Conor O' Shea.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, unencyclopedic. Kelly ^hi! 03:45, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Consanguinity chart.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned chart. Kelly ^hi! 03:47, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Consecutive reactions rate constants 1-2.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Obsolete diagram. Kelly ^hi! 03:48, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Move to commons -- 65.92.180.137 (talk) 05:43, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Constant current for LED.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Obsolete diagram. Kelly ^hi! 03:49, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Constantine - Autograph I.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, unencyclopedic. Kelly ^hi! 03:50, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Constantine Autograph VI.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, unencyclopedic. Kelly ^hi! 03:50, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Constituency of Longford Roscommon.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:11, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Obsolete map. Kelly ^hi! 03:52, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Move to commons alternate map -- 65.92.180.137 (talk) 05:41, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Move to commons. --86.40.193.140 (talk) 05:08, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
It's an out of date map. If you want it on Commons, nobody is stopping you from moving it there. But don't ask someone else to do work you are unwilling to do yourself. --B (talk) 18:33, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Constituency of Sligo Leitrim.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:11, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Obsolete map. Kelly ^hi! 03:52, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Move to commons alternate map -- 65.92.180.137 (talk) 05:41, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Move to commons. --86.40.193.140 (talk) 05:09, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Constrictthemasses.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:07, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, unencyclopedic. Kelly ^hi! 03:53, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Constructal view of the Atlanta airport.JPEG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:07, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned diagram. Kelly ^hi! 03:54, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Consular defeats.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:07, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Obsolete map. Kelly ^hi! 03:55, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sustaining my own objection here and moving this one to Commons. It's a part of a series of images used in Third Servile War and so the potential for future use is obvious. Nothing about it is "obsolete". Old congressional district maps are obsolete - historical maps are not. --B (talk) 11:57, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ConsultanteseDeckChevrons.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:07, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, unencyclopedic. Kelly ^hi! 03:55, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ConsumerCowboy.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:07, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, unencyclopedic. Kelly ^hi! 03:56, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ContentList.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:07, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, unencyclopedic. Kelly ^hi! 03:57, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ContourSquares.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:07, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Obsolete diagram. Kelly ^hi! 03:58, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Proposed Lines.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:10, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, contains author mark in the image itself B (talk) 03:59, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Control flow.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:07, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Obsolete diagram. Kelly ^hi! 03:59, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Controlled-gate.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:08, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Obsolete diagram. Kelly ^hi! 04:00, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ConvertedGW.jpeg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by DeltaQuad (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, unencyclopedic. Kelly ^hi! 04:01, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Convex-function-graph.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:11, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Obsolete diagram. Kelly ^hi! 04:02, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Move to commons -- 65.92.180.137 (talk) 05:38, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- There are several similar, but in a correct format (SVG) images in Commons:Category:Convexity (functions). If you want something like this moved to Commons, nobody is stopping you, but don't ask others to do busy work on your behalf. --B (talk) 18:36, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:CoolSpike.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by DeltaQuad (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, unencyclopedic. Kelly ^hi! 04:05, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Coord planes.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:11, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Obsolete diagram. Kelly ^hi! 04:06, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Move to commons nice representation, so usable -- 65.92.180.137 (talk) 05:38, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Coord1b.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by DeltaQuad (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Obsolete diagram. Kelly ^hi! 04:07, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Coord8.GIF

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by DeltaQuad (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Obsolete diagram. Kelly ^hi! 04:07, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Copal.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by DeltaQuad (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, unencyclopedic. Kelly ^hi! 04:08, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Copal3.GIF

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by DeltaQuad (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, unencyclopedic. Kelly ^hi! 04:08, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Copenhagen logo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by DeltaQuad (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned logo. Kelly ^hi! 04:09, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Copiaaaaa.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by DeltaQuad (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, unencyclopedic. Kelly ^hi! 04:12, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Copperplate Gothic 29BC.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by James086 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:11, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned textimage. Kelly ^hi! 04:13, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Move to commons It should be used in the font article. -- 65.92.180.137 (talk) 05:36, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Copy PSII new design.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by DeltaQuad (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Obsolete diagram. Kelly ^hi! 04:14, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Copy right no..PNG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete. No reason to move to Commons. Nv8200p talk 01:24, 22 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, unencyclopedic. Kelly ^hi! 04:15, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Move to commons -- 65.92.180.137 (talk) 05:35, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Copyright Cian Butler 2006.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by DeltaQuad (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, unencyclopedic. Kelly ^hi! 04:16, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Postoffice1a.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by DeltaQuad (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, no evidence of permission given and the description page says "© Wells College, Aurora, NY, 2007" B (talk) 04:16, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Copyofwormhole1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by DeltaQuad (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, unencyclopedic. Kelly ^hi! 04:16, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Corazón de Boca.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by DeltaQuad (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, unencyclopedic. Kelly ^hi! 04:17, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Corba Server.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by DeltaQuad (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned diagram. Kelly ^hi! 04:18, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Corbel sample.PNG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by DeltaQuad (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned textimage. Kelly ^hi! 04:18, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Cords.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by DeltaQuad (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned map. Kelly ^hi! 04:19, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Core icon.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:11, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned icon. Kelly ^hi! 04:20, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Move to commons -- 65.92.180.137 (talk) 05:34, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Coreworld fig1.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by DeltaQuad (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned diagram. Kelly ^hi! 04:22, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Coreworld fig2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by DeltaQuad (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned diagram. Kelly ^hi! 04:23, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Corfu-isl.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by DeltaQuad (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Obsolete map. Kelly ^hi! 04:24, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Satanic Chaos Star.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by DeltaQuad (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, unencyclopedic B (talk) 04:26, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Cork.Shield.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, low resolution. Kelly ^hi! 04:27, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:TT-logo red-1-.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by DeltaQuad (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned logo, user claims to be the author, which would make it unencyclopedic B (talk) 04:27, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The logo is acceptable under point number 9 of Wikipedia policy concerning the use of non-free images and deleting logo will remove from the article and is not an orphan which has been used since 2008. Bingo Bob 17:17, 9 March 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Agljones (talk • contribs)
  - Can you please point to the article where this logo is in use? Neither file links nor what links here show anything. Also, if it is in use, then a correct fair use tag and rationale need to be added. --B (talk) 17:25, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  - The logo is used the Isle of Man TT article since 2008 and the logo is acceptable under point number 9 of Wikipedia policy concerning the use of non-free images and deleting logo will remove from the article. agljones 20:14, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
    - Actually File:Isle of Man TT.svg is used in that article. LGA _talk^edits 21:14, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as Orphaned and incorrectly licensed LGA _talk^edits 21:14, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:CorkyCoker.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, unencyclopedic. Kelly ^hi! 04:27, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:SuperHub.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by DeltaQuad (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, no evidence of permission, words fail me in trying to describe it B (talk) 04:29, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Corn3.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, unencyclopedic. Kelly ^hi! 04:29, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Cornerhousex.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, unencyclopedic. Kelly ^hi! 04:30, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Coronene chemical structure.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Obsolete diagram. Kelly ^hi! 04:32, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Corporate ballot.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned diagram. Kelly ^hi! 04:33, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Untitled-4 copy.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by DeltaQuad (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, photo of a non-notable person who is "aiming to become one of the most sucessfull C.E.O's in the world". Best wishes to him. B (talk) 04:34, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Corruption Perceptions Index 2007.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete Moved to Commons. File from Commons showing through. Nv8200p talk 01:36, 22 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Obsoleted map. Kelly ^hi! 04:34, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Move to commons how is it obsolete? Do we have several 2007 corruption index maps? -- 65.92.180.137 (talk) 05:31, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Cortes map.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Obsoleted map. Kelly ^hi! 04:35, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Whitegravenor1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by DeltaQuad (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Tagged as copyrighted free use "provided that the use is for the web only". One, even if that license were legitimate, it's too restrictive for Wikipedia to accept. And two, it's a misunderstanding of that the source website - http://web.archive.org/web/20051130025332/http://data.georgetown.edu/graphics/images/ - actually says. They aren't offering a license - it's a list of images for their own publications to use, not for anyone on the internet to use. B (talk) 04:38, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Healysnow.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by DeltaQuad (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

As above, the alleged license "provided that the use is for the web only" is too restrictive for Wikipedia, but it's a misunderstanding of what the copyright holder actually says - these images are for their own publications, not for anyone on the internet to use B (talk) 04:40, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Whitegravenor.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by DeltaQuad (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

As above, the alleged license "provided that the use is for the web only" is too restrictive for Wikipedia, but it's a misunderstanding of what the copyright holder actually says - these images are for their own publications, not for anyone on the internet to use B (talk) 04:40, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Cotestluc.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Obsolete map. Kelly ^hi! 04:41, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Move to commons valid alternative locator map -- 65.92.180.137 (talk) 05:29, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Cotswall1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, unencyclopedic. Kelly ^hi! 04:41, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Cotton to England.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Obsolete map. Kelly ^hi! 04:42, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Coulombs law.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete - deprecated by File:Coulombslaw.svg which is already on commons. James086 ^Talk 14:46, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Obsoleted diagram. Kelly ^hi! 04:43, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Move to commons -- 65.92.180.137 (talk) 05:27, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Council avitar.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, unencyclopedic. Kelly ^hi! 04:44, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Counter Vandalism Unit 2.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete the image is deprecated by File:CVU.svg which is already on commons. James086 ^Talk 14:45, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned logo. Kelly ^hi! 04:45, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Move to commons -- 65.92.180.137 (talk) 05:26, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Counter vandalism.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete - commons has no need for this image, especially considering the author's name appearing in it. James086 ^Talk 14:39, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned logo. Kelly ^hi! 04:46, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Move to commons -- 65.92.180.137 (talk) 05:26, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
delete never used, unencyclopedic. Mangoe (talk) 14:35, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Counteracting.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Obsoleted diagram. Kelly ^hi! 04:47, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Move to commons -- 65.92.180.137 (talk) 05:25, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- I see these comments on IFDs ... if you think it should be moved to Commons, then move it to Commons. Nobody is stopping you. But given that there is a much nicer image at Commons - File:Wuxing en.svg - and it's SVG (which it should be), I see no reason whatsoever to waste the time/effort to move this one. --B (talk) 14:19, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  - What's WP:IFU called on Commons? -- 65.92.180.137 (talk) 00:19, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    - I don't even know if they have such a thing. You could make an account and upload if you are so inclined. --B (talk) 06:51, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
delete as superseded by the commons version. Mangoe (talk) 14:34, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Courteenersedit.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:08, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, unencyclopedic. Kelly ^hi! 05:01, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

possibly keep This was obviously intended for The Courteeners and it's unclear why the uploader never put it in the article; if it is kept it should replace the current and much inferior image. That said it looks like professional promo photography and I have doubts that the licensing is accurate. Mangoe (talk) 14:32, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Considering the comment in the user's re-upload of the file - == Licensing == {{Non-free promotional}}, I think we have an answer to the question. --B (talk) 12:22, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ImagineNOTHING.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete James086 ^Talk 14:37, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, no discernible encyclopedic purpose B (talk) 06:12, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Fondling Amber.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete image suitable for the article of a band that was deleted due to notability. James086 ^Talk 14:37, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, no discernible encyclopedic use B (talk) 06:14, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:GaryMariaPPBob.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete - even though it's free there's no use for it. James086 ^Talk 14:35, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, no description given B (talk) 06:20, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

comment This originally appeared in a highly promotional version of Robert C. Tapella, which was created by employees of the Government Printing Office. The image in question was included in this edit in which the figures are labelled in the caption. The image is plainly free. No comment on whether we would want to retain this image or move it to commons. Mangoe (talk) 14:25, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Trishvslita2.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete James086 ^Talk 14:32, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, license claim seems highly dubious B (talk) 06:21, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mhlogo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete James086 ^Talk 14:32, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, uploaded only for a deleted article B (talk) 06:23, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Head Liquidmetal.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete James086 ^Talk 14:30, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not used in articles. User claims to be the author, but it looks darned similar to this ... http://www.rallytennis.com/Head_Liquidmetal_170_Racquetball_Racquet_p/rhd00135.htm ... sure, the colors are different, but everything else is the same - this is obviously a promo image from the manufacturer B (talk) 06:27, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

delete pretty obviously the same (copyrighted) image. Mangoe (talk) 14:16, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Jake La Botz.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: moved to today's page - Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2013 March 20 --B (talk) 18:19, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Declined F11 Sourced to "Photo shoot in Astoria, Queens" and no evidence the copyright owner has agreed to licence it in that way. LGA _talk^edits 06:31, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hold please. I have reached out to the uploader and asked him to contact OTRS with a statement of permission. He's obviously someone who works for the subject, not just some guy grabbing a picture off the internet. We need to treat people like this who are trying to donate high quality photos with more respect than just repeatedly templating their talk page with deletion notices. --B (talk) 12:20, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Om 043.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Moved to commons James086 ^Talk 18:46, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, unencyclopedic B (talk) 14:21, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Could be used in the article "of Montreal". Ideally on Commons though. James086 ^Talk 14:26, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Empiresgame.PNG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete James086 ^Talk 14:25, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, "This is my map of Europe that I created and use on my forum", Wikipedia is not free webhosting. B (talk) 14:32, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Empiresgame2.PNG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete James086 ^Talk 14:24, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, "The political map of Europe that I use on my forum...", Wikipedia is not free webhosting. B (talk) 14:32, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Studioshotsophiecollier.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan personal photo, no encyclopedic value -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 22:13, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2013 March 8

March 8

Five map images

File:Connecticut Highway 19.png & File:Connecticut Highway 25.png

Navigation menu

Search