Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2013 April 19

< April 18	April 20 >

April 19

File:James Holmes, cropped.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep. (ESkog)^(Talk) 06:34, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use. Holmes is still alive and a free picture may (based on file history, is) be available — Crisco 1492 (talk) 06:21, 19 April 2013 (UTC) — Crisco 1492 (talk) 06:21, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and speedy close. This file was already nominated for deletion; the result was keep. The rationale for fair use is that it shows the subject as he was made up with red hair as "the Joker" at the time of the shootings. People who would be unable to name the subject will still be aware of having heard of the accused Joker murderer with died hair; the picture is not just being used to show the subject in any old light, but specifically in that guise. That is a highly relevant to the event, a shooting at a Batman screening, commented on directly in the article, and historically irreplaceable. As for the supposedly possibly free picture of the subject with brown hair, it was improperly loaded into the file. It does not show the subject as disguised at the time of the shooting, is not subject of fair use commentary in the article, and there is no proof it is free. That image can be treated separately if there is proof it is free (Colorado state booking pictures are not free--see the prior deletion nomination) but its existence has nothing to do with fair use of the red-haired picture. μηδείς (talk) 16:10, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Nominating an image for deletion 8 minutes after deletion is generally disruptive and subject to a speedy close. 8 months? Not so much. There is nothing wrong with allowing this discussion to take place. --B (talk) 16:29, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I wasn't suggesting the nomination is disruptive, rather it seems to be based on an assumption which is manifestly false, that the other picture that was uploaded was free. (Even if it were it doesn't illustrate the red hair commented on in the press and in the article.) Indeed, if the brown-haired version still exists that version should be deleted as non-fair use. μηδείς (talk) 17:59, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Five of the files in the history should be speedy deleted, including the one that you said was non-free. We don't need to see dilated pupils in this picture to understand what dilated eyes are. We don't need to see red hair in this picture to know what red hair is. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 20:58, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Done - I have removed the alternate image from the history. --B (talk) 23:38, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The particular alternate photo in question - http://www.slate.com/articles/health_and_science/explainer/2013/01/james_holmes_mental_illness_are_dilated_pupils_a_sign_of_mental_state.html - is credited everywhere I have seen it as coming from the Arapahoe County Sheriff's office (not the FBI) so unless there is an FBI photo out there somewhere, we don't have a free alternative. People who are expected to be incarcerated forever are usually taken as an exception to the prohibition on fair use photos of living people. --B (talk) 16:29, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Close please. This cropped, low-quality image from a press release has a clear fair-use rationale, to illustrate the highly notable and commented-on appearance of the suspect at the time of his arrest. The suggestion that it would be replaceable by images of a generic person with red hair and a generic person with dilated eyes is wholly unhelpful. Given the keep result of the prior discussion and that only the nominator here has suggested deletion closure seems appropriate. μηδείς (talk) 15:47, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Louis Vuitton CL.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep under new licensing as PD-textlogo. (ESkog)^(Talk) 13:34, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Logo is likely too high res for fair use. There is already a Louis Vuitton logo on the Louis Vuitton article that meets the WP:NFCC, so the addition of a second one is not necessary and fails fair use policy. Nick—^Contact/_Contribs 15:15, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment wouldn't this be {{PD-textlogo}} ? -- 70.24.250.103 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 05:01, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, and more specifically paragraph 1, 3 and 8 of WP:NFCC. Nymf _{talk to me} 13:21, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- So why isn't this PD-Text? -- 70.24.250.103 (talk) 21:23, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and move to Commons. Almost certainly pd-textlogo. — This, that and the other (talk) 10:42, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - PD-text and SVG fairuse logos are a common occurrence here as previous discussions have deemed them to be acceptable. – Connormah (talk) 19:21, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:MFC AWAY.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:10, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unused sports shirt, of unidentified team. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:16, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Thum(69).jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:10, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unused image of unidentified building, In addition the image looks like it's an artists impression. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:24, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:The Man.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:10, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unusedimage of unidentified individual, Image does not assert notability of it's subject. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:26, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:The Pheonix.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:10, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unused image of an artwork which is not currently identified. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:26, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Tripwire.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Withdrawn by nominator with no other comments. (ESkog)^(Talk) 13:36, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unused image of unidentified individuals, notability of image subject is not stated. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:29, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nom withdrawn - Identified as an Indian Punk Rock group.. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:54, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Tomas3.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:10, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unused image of an unidentified individual, notability of image subject, not stated. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:31, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Th MVC-020S.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:10, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unused image, lacking description, image is low res and the notability of it's subject is not stated. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:36, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Massacre conspiracy.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep and migrate to Commons Nthep (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA)

Unused image lacking description, Image does not assert the notability of it's subject. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:52, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Migrate to Commons assuming it really is free; Malaysian Metalcore band with an article on the Malay Wikipedia. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 05:05, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sub2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:10, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unused image of unidentified individuals, image does not assert notability of it's subject. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:56, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Summer shots 07 053.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:10, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unused image, lacking description, Image does not assert notability of it's subject. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:57, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Syracuse0252.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:10, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unused image lacking a description, image does not assert notability of it's subject. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:59, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Supercraft.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:10, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unused image of unidentified individuals, Image does not assert the notability of it's subject. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:02, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Del Paso - -4 par 5 668.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep and migrated to Commons Nthep (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA)

Unused generic image of a golf course hole, that does not assert notability of it's subject. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:15, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Migrate to Commons: high enough resolution for easy Web reuse, decent technical quality. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 21:03, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Devotees.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:10, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Image lacking a description, which does not assert the notability of its subject. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:17, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:VoxCrate.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:10, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan low quality image that is extremely blurry. No encyclopedic value as unable to make out details of either amp (or speaker?) -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 17:40, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:You and Me Music Video.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:10, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Violates WP:NFCC#8: not necessary for understanding the article. Stefan2 (talk) 18:33, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Yuri Alexandrov.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep. (ESkog)^(Talk) 04:17, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free image of recently deceased person, no effort made to locate a free image, image also does not show person whilst they were a boxer (WP:NFCC#8 hence fails non-free criteria Black Kite (talk) 18:45, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

no effort made to locate a free image = false statement; google image search done. please clarify the level of effort required. i see that the attempt to require an email, did not gain a consensus. Slowking4^{Farmbrough's revenge}⇔ †@1₭ 18:58, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I just researched it myself, there is no free image at this time - not on Flickr, not on Google (via the free license search, etc). So keep under fair use rationale. SarahStierch (talk) 20:45, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

And it does show him while he was involved in boxing. He is at a press conference related to boxing. He doesn't have to be "actually boxing" in order to make this a fair use rationale image. He's representing himself as a boxer and his connection to the sport. [1] SarahStierch (talk) 20:46, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Do we know who the NEDHD or NEPHP is that all of the photos on the source website are credited to?[2] Is this a press agency? --B (talk) 20:54, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Go to the search page and search for anything. The page's <title> becomes "Nephp Publisher: Search Results". Nephp Publisher appears to be some kind of software for Internet magazines. See http://www.nelogic.com/cms/07-11-2005/19-nephp-publisher.html --Stefan2 (talk) 21:22, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  - It seems odd that would be what they are referring to ... the spot on the image is where you normally see credits. --B (talk) 23:36, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. This file has a complete non-free use rationale that is in compliance with WP:NFCC and WP:NFC#UUI. Neither WP:NFCC#8 nor any other policy requires that a boxer be shown "whilst they were a boxer". Gobōnobō ⁺ ^c 22:08, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Nike Training Club Image.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:10, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Promotional image for an app used on an article for an ad agency. Fails WP:NFCC#8. Gobōnobō ⁺ ^c 18:48, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Leeps valley photos

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: wrong forum --B (talk) 23:34, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

As above--File Éireann 20:51, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator note As an administrator yourself I would hope you would understand that these images are hosted at commons and can't be deleted locally. You created local pages for them when nominating them for deletion, which will now themselves have to be deleted. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:14, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-administrator comment) I've tagged the Commons files with Commons:Template:Copyvio and the local file information pages with Template:Db-f2. Three files stolen from Flickr, one from Panoramio. --Stefan2 (talk) 21:35, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I have now deleted all the new files which I inadvertently created. Apologies.--File Éireann 22:33, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Evoor Parayan Thullal.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:10, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The evidence of half toning in the image makes me skepticla that this is the uploaders own work. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:03, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Evoor Sheethankan Thullal.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:10, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Evidence of half-toning images make me skeptical that it is the uploaders own work. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:04, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Gellwe Jelly Pack.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F6 by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:05, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Packaging artwork Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:13, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Multimeasure rest2.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:10, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Old, unused file, made obsolete by File:Old multirests.png Fuebar (talk) 21:58, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Move to commons a singular representation instead of the multiple representations of the other file. -- 70.24.250.103 (talk) 04:48, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Double accidentals.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:10, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Made obsolete by File:Double accidentals.svg Fuebar (talk) 22:02, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Move to commons a different representation -- 70.24.250.103 (talk) 04:49, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Low quality; the two representations are effectively the same. — This, that and the other (talk) 10:40, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Alto clef.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:10, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Made obsolete by File:Alto clef.svg Fuebar (talk) 22:05, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2013 April 19

Contents

April 19

File:James Holmes, cropped.jpg

File:Louis Vuitton CL.svg

File:MFC AWAY.png

File:Thum(69).jpg

File:The Man.jpg

File:The Pheonix.jpg

File:Tripwire.JPG

File:Tomas3.jpg

File:Th MVC-020S.jpg

File:Massacre conspiracy.jpg

File:Sub2.jpg

File:Summer shots 07 053.jpg

File:Syracuse0252.JPG

File:Supercraft.jpg

File:Del Paso - -4 par 5 668.jpg

File:Devotees.JPG

File:VoxCrate.JPG

File:You and Me Music Video.png

File:Yuri Alexandrov.jpg

File:Nike Training Club Image.jpg

Leeps valley photos

File:Evoor Parayan Thullal.jpg

File:Evoor Sheethankan Thullal.jpg

File:Gellwe Jelly Pack.jpg

File:Multimeasure rest2.gif

File:Double accidentals.gif

File:Alto clef.gif

Navigation menu

Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2013 April 19

April 19

Leeps valley photos

Navigation menu

Search