Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2011 July 5
Contents
- 1 July 5
- 1.1 File:556750638712.jpg
- 1.2 File:ATHFmain.jpg
- 1.3 File:Carl Brutananadilewski.png
- 1.4 File:Dr. Werid with Steve.png
- 1.5 File:Recurring Aqua Teen Hunger Force characters.png
- 1.6 File:Last-One.jpg
- 1.7 File:ATHF-minor.jpg
- 1.8 File:ParisandBond.jpg
- 1.9 File:Quit-2-Win logo.jpg
- 1.10 File:Stress Reduction.gif
- 1.11 File:Sabrina1.PNG
- 1.12 File:Las brujas de south beachpilotstill.jpg
- 1.13 File:Wanderingsongstress.jpg
- 1.14 File:Computerlab.jpg
July 5
[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:03, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:556750638712.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Automatedmusic (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Orphaned. Although free content, it is a logo for an article that has been previously deleted per this discussion, and then just speedy deleted again about less than an hour ago.[1]Zzyzx11 (talk) 02:03, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: No Consensus. -FASTILY (TALK) 03:53, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:ATHFmain.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Grapesoda22 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Fails WP:NFCC. JJ98 (Talk / Contributions) 07:02, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - I can't see which one it fails. See similar discussions below. Magog the Ogre (talk) 23:42, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Athaenara (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:37, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Carl Brutananadilewski.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Grapesoda22 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Fails WP:NFCC. JJ98 (Talk / Contributions) 07:02, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Athaenara (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:37, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Dr. Werid with Steve.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Grapesoda22 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Fails WP:NFCC. JJ98 (Talk / Contributions) 07:02, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep Magog the Ogre (talk) 23:43, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Recurring Aqua Teen Hunger Force characters.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Grapesoda22 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Fails WP:NFCC. JJ98 (Talk / Contributions) 07:02, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Huh? Appears to be being used as a group shot in exactly the way encouraged by WP:NFLISTS, to show in one picture what several of the principal characters look like. Rationale target needs to be updated to take into account a page-name change, but that shouldn't be a hanging offence. Without any clearer identification of which of the WP:NFCC this is being claimed to fail, and how, this has to be a keep. Jheald (talk) 17:11, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep Magog the Ogre (talk) 23:44, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Last-One.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Grapesoda22 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Fails WP:NFCC. JJ98 (Talk / Contributions) 07:03, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- As above. Shows many identified characters all together in one picture, in exactly the way recommended by WP:NFLISTS. Keep. Jheald (talk) 17:13, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Athaenara (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:37, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:ATHF-minor.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Grapesoda22 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Fails WP:NFCC. JJ98 (Talk / Contributions) 07:03, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: No Consensus. -FASTILY (TALK) 03:54, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:ParisandBond.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Dr. Blofeld (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
In it's current use the file is replaceable by any picture about Pierce Brosnan. Armbrust Talk to me Contribs 12:31, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- 'Comment I would say that James Bond should appear in character to illustrate James Bond, and that looking like Grey Owl (another role played by Brosnan) would be highly inappropriate to illustrate James Bond. 65.93.15.213 (talk) 05:07, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Not necessarily. It just have to be a photo about him from the time he played James Bond. Sir Armbrust Talk to me Contribs 22:39, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- James Bond never had a pony tail or long locks (Grey Owl) in any Brosnan Bond film, so it would be inappropriate to not look like James Bond if you're going to illustrate James Bond. It would be misleading and detrimental to the understanding of what James Bond looks like if you're going to use any old photo, regardless of what it illustrates. (Ofcourse you could probably get a way with Brosnan in a tuxedo at some random dinner party, during his Bond era, since that looks like Bond) 65.93.15.213 (talk) 05:58, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Not necessarily. It just have to be a photo about him from the time he played James Bond. Sir Armbrust Talk to me Contribs 22:39, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Appropriate depiction of the actor in character, used in the article for the reader to understand how the character was depicted. Jheald (talk) 17:15, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Interesting that for the Daniel Craig section on the same article a free image is used and not a screenshot from a film. Sir Armbrust Talk to me Contribs 16:00, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:03, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Quit-2-Win logo.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Rsawrie (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Orphaned, to complex to be considered PD-text so presumably non-free and unused. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 13:15, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nominator. File is too complex for PD-text and is orphaned. Sir Armbrust Talk to me Contribs 23:14, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. per nom. Jheald (talk) 17:16, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 22:17, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Stress Reduction.gif (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Frozen4322 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Orphaned, can't see any real use for it. If an article would required a description of it, a text description would work just as well. Possible copyvio. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 13:32, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I see no further use of the image Frozen4322 : Chat 19:55, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:05, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Sabrina1.PNG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Sf46 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
No evidence to believe this was published without a copyright notice. Source says "© Time Inc. For personal non-commercial use only". damiens.rf 15:43, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Photo was originally published in 1960. Photo is public domain due to age, pre-1964. Sf46 (talk) 16:13, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Are all photos originally published pre-1964 public domain? --damiens.rf 17:07, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Nope, but this one does not have a copyright renewal. Ergo, the copyright has expired and the image is PD. Buffs (talk) 01:18, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Are all photos originally published pre-1964 public domain? --damiens.rf 17:07, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep See above + updated rationale in 3...2...1... Buffs (talk) 01:18, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- LIFE Magazine didn't renew their copyrights? Really? --B (talk) 13:03, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete unless anyone can provide a convincing argument that the copyright notice was not present to begin with or that it was not renewed. Neither of the above assertions at all addresses this issue. Magog the Ogre (talk) 23:47, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: No Consensus. -FASTILY (TALK) 03:56, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Las brujas de south beachpilotstill.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Mosquera (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Random decorative promotional shot. damiens.rf 16:00, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Neutral. A picture showing the main cast all together as dressed and styled for the screen is appropriate in a comprehensive article on a show. But this article is such a tiny stub, with so little information about these characters apart from a bare listing of who they were played by, that use of this photo risks appearing disproportionate. No strong view to delete therefore; but no strong view to keep either. Jheald (talk) 17:23, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - relevant to the article, imparts information not available in a free screenshot. Size of the article isn't important. Magog the Ogre (talk) 23:51, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: No Consensus. -FASTILY (TALK) 03:58, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Wanderingsongstress.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Badagnani (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
We don't have to use a non-free picture of a singer singing in an article about the song she sings. There's no relevant information in this still. damiens.rf 16:03, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Neutral but perhaps lean to keep. Does this photo add to reader understanding about the topic? If the song is particularly associated with this one screen performance, then I think seeing what that performance looked like quite possibly does. Jheald (talk) 17:27, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - given that this is the source of the song, and its most important incarnation, the image does in fact impart important information to the reader. Magog the Ogre (talk) 23:51, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I disagree with your specific rationale. What exactly do you mean by saying this still is the "source of the song"? And what you say next does not describe a common practice on Wikipedia. --damiens.rf 02:22, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 01:03, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Computerlab.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by African Girls (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Current revision has no licensing info (it was uploaded over a different file by a different uploader, but the new uploader didn't change the description or license), and the old revision looks like it could be a copyvio based on the styling of its borders and such. Certainly delete the current rev, and probably the original also. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 22:16, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete both old and new versions don't show much of a computer lab, one shows the outside of a building, not illustrating any computers, the other shows one computer, not illustrating any sort of lab. 65.93.15.213 (talk) 05:06, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.