Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2009 December 30
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Contents
- 1 December 30
- 1.1 File:Eric-zeier.jpg
- 1.2 File:FranciscoM.Quinones.jpg
- 1.3 File:LB2-Adult-L3.jpg
- 1.4 File:Siouxsie New Sounds new styles.jpg
- 1.5 File:Wharf Area.jpg
- 1.6 File:YuiMakinoOct2009.jpg
- 1.7 File:AVHSMap.jpg
- 1.8 File:F-Zero Conference in July 2003.jpg
- 1.9 File:FSU ETA.gif
- 1.10 File:Wayneavenue.JPG
- 1.11 File:Middlebrooksouth.JPG
- 1.12 File:FactionRelationships4.jpg
- 1.13 File:Queen opening uk parliament.jpg
- 1.14 File:Main Street & The Banner Road - Greenville, Virginia.jpg
- 1.15 File:The Dixie Theater.jpg
- 1.16 File:Fargo D-700 1959.jpg
- 1.17 File:Feel Air A330-200.jpg
- 1.18 File:Champlain bridge demo.jpg
- 1.19 File:Americanhotel.JPG
- 1.20 File:Klann Organ Company in Waynesboro, Virginia.JPG
- 1.21 File:More eggs.jpg
- 1.22 File:Downtown building in Basic City, Virginia.JPG
- 1.23 File:White Star Mills 3-24-07.JPG
- 1.24 File:Wik sal2.jpg
- 1.25 File:Wik d74.jpg
- 1.26 File:Wik d73.jpg
- 1.27 File:Wik d71.jpg
- 1.28 File:G18 glamour lrg.jpg
- 1.29 File:GSC map.JPG
- 1.30 File:GYS-Factory.jpg
- 1.31 File:Vikrant Hawker.gif
December 30
[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:03, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Copyvio from here Corpx (talk) 05:35, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: kept but absent the painter's name the license should be {{PD-art}} and that's what I've changed it to. Angus McLellan (Talk) 19:48, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:FranciscoM.Quinones.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Marine 69-71 (notify | contribs).
- Random drawing/picture grabbed from an unreliable angelfire page. Any properly attributed image of this man will be in the public domain, and there are many books (and other reliable sources online and offline) that contain images of this man. No point in picking the first image on a google image search and using. Damiens.rf 01:34, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - The so-called "unreliable" page posted the source from where it obtained the image which is the following: "Retrato tomado de: Puertorriqueños Ilustres. Editorial Cordillera, Inc., 1994. Folleto auspiciado por Island Finance Corporation." Thereby providing it's original source, which happens to from a "book". Tony the Marine (talk) 04:19, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:02, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- OR, UE, LQ, use not stated, possible CV. -FASTILY (TALK) 04:44, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I see the editor has said they don't know what the initials mean. I'm not clear about UE (naming convention?) and LQ (logical quotation but I don't know how that applies). CV of course is copyvio which might also apply. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dougweller (talk • contribs) 12:58, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Rettetast (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:07, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Siouxsie New Sounds new styles.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Adrift* (notify | contribs).
- image is a magazine cover but is not being used to illustrate discussion of the magazine. It is being used in Goth subculture and 1980s in fashion to discuss the style of the person pictured. Rossrs (talk) 10:05, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. The image is very useful to illustrate the gothic fashions described in both Goth subculture and 1980s in fashion. There are pitifully few images available to adequately show the actual clothing worn by the original goths of the 1980s. This image of Siouxsie is very useful to Wikipedia, and thus should be kept.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 08:49, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- There are images of Siouxsie in Commons. Admittedly not great images. The image template used for this image includes the phrase "to illustrate the publication of the issue of the magazine in question", which is not how this image is being used in either article. The publication isn't discussed. WP:Non free content says under the heading of "unacceptable use". "A rose, cropped from a record album, to illustrate an article on roses." This is a magazine cover, but the point is the same. In this case Siouxsie is the rose. In the sections using this image in both Goth subculture and 1980s in fashion, Siouxsie Sioux is not even mentioned. She is mentioned elsewhere in each article, but it's no more than a mention and in 1980s in fashion there is a free image of her in the image gallery. Rossrs (talk) 14:40, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, decorative/replaceable fiar use. Stifle (talk) 11:58, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Rossrs seemed to say it best. There are images on Commons, and those are free, thus we can dispense with this non-free one. SchuminWeb (Talk) 04:26, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:02, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Wharf Area.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Weatherdude (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned. SchuminWeb (Talk) 13:24, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:02, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:YuiMakinoOct2009.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by KyuuketsukiTim (notify | contribs).
- This picture is a promotional picture and the current FUR being employed merely states...I am not affiliated with Epic Records in anyway, and permission has been given to us to use her images for promotional usage for her upcoming overseas performance in Singapore....which seems rather vague to me as it's not clear who "us" is. This could be a copyright violation. There is also a free alternative that could be used instead. --Remy Suen (talk) 13:36, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:02, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The rationale for this image does not seem to meet Wikipedia:non-free content criteria point 8 (contextual significance) and perhaps also point 1 (may be replaceable). Angus McLellan (Talk) 14:17, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The image is important to determine the relative locations of the buildings mentioned in the history of the school. There is no free version of a document of the map of the school. Do you have any suggestions on how to update the rationale to better fit the Wikipedia:non-free content criteria? Thank you - Deltawk (talk) 04:01, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- delete - Whatever relevant information this drawing may contain could be replaced by some Wikipedian's (freely licensed) drawing. --Damiens.rf 05:56, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The image is important to determine the relative locations of the buildings mentioned in the history of the school. There is no free version of a document of the map of the school. Do you have any suggestions on how to update the rationale to better fit the Wikipedia:non-free content criteria? Thank you - Deltawk (talk) 04:01, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Image can be replaced with a free alternative. Fails WP:NFCC#1. Rettetast (talk) 11:11, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:02, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:F-Zero Conference in July 2003.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by FullMetal Falcon (notify | contribs).
- The rationale for using this non-free content is that it will "describe the relationship between Nintendo and Sega during their first project collaboration". That relationship could be, and is, described extensively at F-Zero GX#Collaboration and relationship so that this image is not merely replaceable by text but has already been replaced and made redundant. This rationale seems to fail WP:NFCC#1 and probably also WP:NFCC#8. Angus McLellan (Talk) 14:23, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I guess the section covers it sufficiently enough now that an image is not needed and no a free image is not available. « ₣M₣ » 03:29, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Rettetast (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:07, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The least important thing about a supercomputer would be the way it looked - just like any other mainframe. I am having trouble seeing how this non-free image meets WP:NFCC#8. Angus McLellan (Talk) 14:38, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:00, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Wayneavenue.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Weatherdude (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned. SchuminWeb (Talk) 15:06, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:00, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Middlebrooksouth.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Weatherdude (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned. SchuminWeb (Talk) 15:06, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete as failing NFCC#8 and 1. - Peripitus (Talk) 21:51, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:FactionRelationships4.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by BabyJonas (notify | contribs).
- Rationale claims that the image cannot be replaced but where used, in Fallen Earth#Factions, the wheel system shown is described in the article text. The image appears then not to meet WP:NFCC#1 (replaceable) and perhaps not WP:NFCC#8 (significance) either. Angus McLellan (Talk) 15:07, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - The text of the article does not specify the entirety of the information depicted in the image, particularly specific factional relationships. For this reason, deleting this image would go against WP:NFCC#1 as well as WP:NFCC#8. If the user insists on deleting this image, the user would be wise to first ensure that the detail in the wheel is accurately transcribed in the article. Once this is done in accordance with WP guidelines, I will advocate the deletion of this image along with the user. Until then, this image should be preserved on Wikipedia. BabyJonas (talk) 00:21, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Angus McLellan. Image is gratuitous eye candy, as are the others screen shots BabyJonas is raining on the article. Jack Merridew 09:30, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. If the information provided by the image is important int can be incorporated in the text. Rettetast (talk) 11:10, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
-Your logic doesn't make sense here. You can say this of any picture "If the information is important, incorporate into text and delete image". BabyJonas (talk) 23:29, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete, doesn't meet all of the non-free content criteria. Angus McLellan (Talk) 17:06, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Queen opening uk parliament.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Tom Edwards (notify | contribs).
- Fails WP:NFCC#8, image is used decoratively only without contributing to readers' understanding of the articles. Stifle (talk) 15:07, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. The image is the only one on Wikipedia that demonstrates the opulence of the ceremony. --Tom Edwards (talk) 19:02, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - the opulence is not discussed, instead the image adorns sections that discuss the origin and other matters associated with the speach—not the throne itself or the Queen's dress. Decorative and fails NFCC#8 - Peripitus (Talk) 06:40, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Fails WP:NFCC#8. Rettetast (talk) 13:24, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:00, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Main Street & The Banner Road - Greenville, Virginia.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Weatherdude (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned. SchuminWeb (Talk) 15:07, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:00, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:The Dixie Theater.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Weatherdude (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned. SchuminWeb (Talk) 15:08, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:02, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Fargo D-700 1959.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Talgo81 (notify | contribs).
- The Fargo (truck) article is well-illustrated with free images showing the company's products. It does not seem that this non-free image adds anything to the reader's understanding or that its absence would detract from that understanding. Apparently fails to meet WP:NFCC#8. Angus McLellan (Talk) 15:22, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:02, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Feel Air A330-200.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Arsenikk (notify | contribs).
- May not meet all of Wikipedia:non-free content criteria. Non-free image used in Feel Air to identify the paint scheme of an airline which is not yet operating. Until aircraft actually exist painted in this way the scheme may change so that this image does not add to the reader's understanding. When aircraft do exist using this paint scheme the image will be replaceable. Angus McLellan (Talk) 15:30, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:02, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Champlain bridge demo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Vchapman (notify | contribs).
- Fails WP:NFCC#1 and WP:NFCC#8. The picture doesn't enhance the reader's understanding of the demolition at all; instead, it just shows a tiny section of the bridge. As such, it serves as little more than decoration, violating NFCC criteria #1 ("Could the subject be adequately conveyed by text without using the non-free content at all?" yes) and #8 ("Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding.") – TMF 20:38, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Orphaned for invalid fair use rationale. SchuminWeb (Talk) 00:12, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:03, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Americanhotel.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Weatherdude (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned. SchuminWeb (Talk) 22:48, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Kept - no it isn't - Image was moved and the redirect is used. All better now - Peripitus (Talk) 21:48, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Klann Organ Company in Waynesboro, Virginia.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Weatherdude (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned. SchuminWeb (Talk) 22:49, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:03, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:More eggs.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Weatherdude (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned. SchuminWeb (Talk) 22:53, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Kept - you missed that it had been renamed and the redirect is used in Basic City, Virginia - Peripitus (Talk) 21:46, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Downtown building in Basic City, Virginia.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Weatherdude (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned. SchuminWeb (Talk) 22:55, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:00, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:White Star Mills 3-24-07.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Weatherdude (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned. SchuminWeb (Talk) 22:55, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:03, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Orphan, not sure where it supposed to go either. — Bility (talk) 23:27, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:03, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Orphan, not sure where it supposed to go either. — Bility (talk) 23:27, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:03, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Orphan, not sure where it supposed to go either. — Bility (talk) 23:27, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:03, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Orphan, not sure where it supposed to go either. — Bility (talk) 23:27, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Rettetast (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:07, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:G18 glamour lrg.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Paradiver (notify | contribs).
- This non-free file is used to illustrate the Galaxy 18 article. It doesn't seem likely that this image is adding to the reader's understanding or that its absence would detract from that understanding. If so, it doesn't meet WP:NFCC#8. Angus McLellan (Talk) 23:32, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Rettetast (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:07, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:GSC map.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Sandejasbn (notify | contribs).
- A map of a mall might possibly add something to the reader's understanding, but removing it wouldn't hurt. Possibly also replaceable. Angus McLellan (Talk) 23:42, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Rettetast (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:07, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- An industrial structure in France has no freedom of panorama issues (only for "for buildings that pass the threshold of originality" and this surely doesn't). Surely replaceable so does not meet WP:NFCC#1. It's also hard to see how this passes WP:NFCC#8. Angus McLellan (Talk) 23:53, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:02, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Unfree image does not meet Wikipedia:NFCC#8, as it can't be distinguished from any other Sea Hawk taking off from an aircraft carrier. Furthermore, both Sea Hawk and INS Vikrant, the subjects of the image, are linked to aid in readers comprehension of the subject. Uploader's fair use rationale: depicts … the scale, magnitude, and efforts of the Indian Navy doesn't seem very accurate either (one plane taking off?). — Bility (talk) 00:35, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.