Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2009 August 14
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Contents
- 1 August 14
- 1.1 File:TheBlisterExistsSingleAlbumCover.JPG
- 1.2 File:Chegwidden's Ribbons.jpg
- 1.3 File:AbhiJeet.jpg
- 1.4 File:Ezzo bin shams.jpg
- 1.5 File:Abc75tgc.JPG
- 1.6 File:Waddah Adam.jpg
- 1.7 File:Aaaa23433.jpg
- 1.8 File:Tool gtr.jpg
- 1.9 File:Abiusm2.JPG
- 1.10 File:Industry Integration.jpg
- 1.11 File:MissMayIBandPhoto.jpg
- 1.12 File:KABC Eyewitness News 2005.jpg
August 14
[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by King of Hearts (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 22:08, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:TheBlisterExistsSingleAlbumCover.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by TheLonersMusic (notify | contribs).
- This is clearly fake coverart created by (I assume) the uploader for a single by a popular band. REZTER TALK ø 11:08, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by King of Hearts (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 22:08, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Chegwidden's Ribbons.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Neovu79 (notify | contribs).
- single use image, redundant to templated individual ribbons. See this edit for the superior way to display awards: using a table to present each individual ribbon, and Template:ribbon devices to display devices. This allows the ribbon rack to be altered much easier if a change is required, and using existing images takes up less space than if every single biography had its own image for ribbons. Since I've already replaced the image with a ribbon rack, the image is useless. Precedent set earlier at Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2009 February 20. bahamut0013wordsdeeds 13:38, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by King of Hearts (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 22:08, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Unused personal photo, uploader is indef blocked. Sherool (talk) 15:23, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by King of Hearts (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 22:08, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Unused personal photo. Sherool (talk) 15:41, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by King of Hearts (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 22:08, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Unused personal photo. Sherool (talk) 15:42, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by King of Hearts (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 22:08, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Unused personal photo. Sherool (talk) 15:42, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by King of Hearts (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 22:08, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Unused personal photo. Sherool (talk) 15:43, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by King of Hearts (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 22:08, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Unused personal photo. Sherool (talk) 15:43, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by King of Hearts (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 22:08, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Not used and low quality, even if all the exess white space was cropped away the actual image is very small and grainy. Sherool (talk) 15:46, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 12:19, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Industry Integration.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by TreborNoslo (notify | contribs).
- Delete: I have been unable to find this, so-called logo, anywhere on the given source website. Beside that there are already 2 non-free real logos in the article Minnesota IMPLAN Group, so this image fails minimal use per WP:NFCC#3a. ww2censor (talk) 16:13, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Alright, here's the address of the logo that I was talking about in that question: File:MIG Logo.jpg
- Also, the image that you have marked for deletion here is not actually a non-free image, rather a result of me cutting and pasting code that I shouldn't have to get an image to show up back when I was first making the page. I am not familiar with coding so it's all a struggle for me, and all I have left is to apologise for the incovenience to the more gifted users. I am fairly certain that I can correct the missplaced non-free coding, but will wait until someone responds so that my act is not perceived as covert. Thanks again for your time and concern, Trebor Noslo (talk) 19:54, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- P.S. Sorry for the double post here, but I thought I might also point out that the only copyrited image on the page is the MIG logo (in the link above), the software image is also actually free content - I just thought it would be best to make it non-free content since it had to do with a company, blissfully unaware of WP:NFCC#3a. Again, my apologies. I'll correct that as soon as someone gives me the nod. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Trebor Noslo (talk • contribs) 20:10, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment What are you talking about? The image in question is File:Industry Integration.jpg for which I cannot find any source on the company website, it looks like a composite and you claim it is copyright of the company and I am not referring to File:MIG Logo.jpg which seem to be properly tagged. You also say that File:MIG Logo.jpg is the only copyright image in the article but that is untrue because File:Implan pro logo.png is a copyright logo too even if you did not upload it. ww2censor (talk) 22:02, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm sorry if I wasn't clear. I uploaded all three images as non-free when I really should have loaded the image in question and the File:Implan pro logo.png as free content as they are not protected by any copyrights. It does look like the image in question is no longer on the main page of that website. I will try to find out if it was moved or just removed. TreborNoslo (talk) 17:12, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Where do you get the idea that this image is freely licenced? If it belongs to the company then it is copyright unless they specifically licence it freely but there is no evidence of that to be found. Show us where that is please and we will be happy to reevaluate it. ww2censor (talk) 22:33, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Before I started the page I got into email contact with a representative of the company. They helped me write a few of the sections and get parts of it more accurately, and I specifically asked them for permission to use the each of those images. For the photo in question and the software image something along the lines of "go ahead, we don't care who uses those" and the only thing that I was to be careful of was the MIG logo. Unfortunately, they have replaced the photo in question on the website so it is no longer being used anywhere on their website. It apparently is still being used in some of their documentation, though. I am not sure what way is best to handle this; should we just delete this photo in question, then have me load up a new version of it as free content referencing the documentation instead? TreborNoslo (talk) 14:23, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Apparently you received some sort of permission from the company but there is no actual evidence of that. If you follow the details at WP:PERMISSION in order to get a formal permission from the company and if they follow up too, then the image may be kept but currently there is no evidence of that except for you claim. We need the company to confirm their permission with a suitable licence and there is no need to reupload the image the licence on this one can be modified. Hopefully you can get that done. ww2censor (talk) 18:10, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks so much for the link, I'll get that started right away. TreborNoslo (talk) 21:22, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:MissMayIBandPhoto.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Krazycev13 (notify | contribs).
- Delete: fair use does not apply to a current band where the image is replaceable so clearly fails WP:NFCC#1. ww2censor (talk) 18:07, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by King of Hearts (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:00, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:KABC Eyewitness News 2005.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by RingtailedFox (notify | contribs).
- Previous brand logo which doesn't significantly add to the reader's understanding. PhilKnight (talk) 22:09, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.