Support — Rhetth 13:32, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support. I thought it'd nominate this unique picture, but i noticed it had already been nominated, but the nominator had failed to add it to the list. --Snoopydawg 11:13, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support, good quality and encyclopaedic. It reminds me of the beautiful film The Cuckoo.--Svetovid 16:53, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Question Why do the people look fairly awkward to me? The woman on the left look particularly awkward, maybe it's just me but it looks like a cut-out face stuck on. PS: Overwritten picture with full-sized version from TIFF from the link on the image description page. --antilivedT | C | G 08:06, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Perhaps because they're not used to being photographed because they lead such a primitive life?
Actually, I think it's a hand-coloured picture (a fairly common practice at the time it was taken). It does look a little odd to modern eyes, but it's typical of this period. Adam Cuerdentalk 23:44, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, the concept of 'smiling for the camara' is a learned cultural practice. Very few photos show anyone smiling at this time (1900), even in so-called 'main-stream' society. There is a book called The Culture Builders that describes this from a Scandinavian perspective. Dinkytown (talk) 09:24, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support, excellent FP status worth image. -- Grandpafootsoldier 08:44, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support this is a much better version than the original nom. I think it could be an autochrome or maybe a hand-tinted monochrome plate, which is why it looks a little "unreal" in places. mikaultalk 12:36, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Support Wow! A great picture, perfectly illustrative of the rare subject it depicts. A+++++ SELLER Jellocube27 17:20, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]