Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Cocoa Pods

Reason: Its very encyclopedic, adds alot to the articles and the composition is just nice somehow.
Articles this image appears in: Chocolate, Cocoa and Cocoa pod
Creator: User:Medicaster40

Support as nominator — Yzmo ^talk 15:30, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very enc. I go cuckoo for cocoa pods. --TotoBaggins 18:03, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Oppose I find the composition very distracting and undescriptive. otherwise it is fine however the composition is the most important part of a picture and this one has too many other element other than the subject. I simpily don't think this is the best we can do. -Fcb981 20:58, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Looks kind of 'eye catching'. ^8thstar 23:16, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose, I think it couild be a bit tighter on the subject. -- Phoenix2 ^(holla) 01:18, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per above. Not focused on the subject. Also, that vertical leaf in the foreground is really distracting. Sorry. Jumping cheese 02:32, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose per Fcb981 above. --Thelb ⁴ 18:02, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Yes, we could get a tighter zoom and there are blown highlights on the pods. But it's still marginally on the good side, in my opinion.--Here T oHelp 20:38, 20 June 2007

(UTC)

supportI actually think it's quite a descriptive and useful image and encyclopedic Recesende 12:21, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Fcb, composition lacks pizazz. --Janke | Talk 13:31, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, I just didn't get that instant sense of quality that would come from a really clean shot. Subject isn't in the absolute center of attention, doesn't draw the eye. vlad§inger ^tlk 17:12, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nothing special. Althepal 02:11, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not promoted --Raven4x4x 09:42, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Navigation menu