Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zude

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  16:21, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

Zude

Zude (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't pass WP:CORP. Insufficient Audience. The media cited are of limited interest and circulation (such as trade journals). The one citation that would meet this (boston.com) makes no reference to Zude in any manner. Independence of sources, other citations are self published or are not sufficiently independent. Finally advertising and promotion is rampant in the article and needs to be significantly cleaned and scoured. Nomination on behalf of Tomtasget. NeilN ^{talk to me} 18:10, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. APerson (talk!) 19:04, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

• Delete - Simply no better improvement. Notifying tagger Safiel. SwisterTwister talk 20:42, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
• Delete per nomination. Ceosad (talk) 23:42, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
• Delete per nomination. SelgeBrown (talk) 23:44, 13 November 2015 (UTC) Sock of Tomtasget, the nominator. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 19:31, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
• Delete per nomination. Safiel (talk) 03:20, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

• Withdrawing participation in this AfD Given that the nominator Tomtasget was engaging in sockpuppetry and given what I have observed on the article talk page, this AfD appears to be, at best, tainted. Withdrawing my vote. Safiel (talk) 02:21, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

• Delete per nom - Cwobeel (talk) 16:16, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. clpo13_(talk) 16:19, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

• Delete Insufficient coverage for WP:GNG. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 17:13, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
• Delete - fails to meet our standards as set out at WP:CORP and elsewhere. --Orange Mike | Talk 04:11, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.