Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zionism as settler colonialism

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy close - it seems that this nomination is motivated by a desire to retain and improve the article either as a separate article or merged into an unspecified other article. AfD isn't really a good forum for this, especially for politically contentious topics like this (and especially at this time).‎. Nick-D (talk) 09:41, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

Zionism as settler colonialism

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Zionism as settler colonialism (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Don’t shoot the messenger (see below), but editors have raised concerns of a POV fork and layout concerns, among other issues. A messy 2022 RfC was closed with suggestions that other processes be used. Seems the quickest way to improve the article (to whatever extent it is decided that improvements are necessary) is to haul it up here. A general venue also has the strong advantage of likely attracting editors without much ARBPIA involvement.

I probably won’t choose to be involved further in this discussion as this is just a Twinkle nom from random patrol (and one that could potentially ignite a firestorm), but my vote at the time of nominating would go to merging into a target to be decided. RadioactiveBoulevardier (talk) 08:41, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History, Politics, Israel, and Palestine. RadioactiveBoulevardier (talk) 08:41, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

Ridiculous nomination. It's clearly a notable topic, per the sources cited in the article. POV fork of what? The article is about a viewpoint (WP:SUBPOV). If you think the viewpoint has no merit, then it's still no more a POV fork than the article creationism. (t · c) buidhe 08:56, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.