Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zhi Gang Sha
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 06:21, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Zhi Gang Sha (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Doesn't seem notable - lacks significant coverage in independent reliable sources; most refs are self-published, others are entries for books in listings - no substantial content. The few remaining are not enough information to support an appropriate biographic article; it isn't neutral, and is somewhat promotional. Contested PROD. Chzz ► 01:05, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep - there are reliable sources available, [1] from Wired, [2] from the Toronto Star (behind paywall), and [3] from St. Petersburg Times (behind paywall). I think there is marginally enough coverage to satisfy the notability guidelines. I do think that the article does have content issues, and uses the subject's website as a source inappropriately, but I think there is enough in the sources to make a more neutral article. Quasihuman | Talk 12:21, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep I stubbed the article and added in some reliable sources. As it stands now, the article is fully sourced and neutral. Qrsdogg (talk) 14:56, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
---
- Withdraw nomination - keep - WP:HEY, nice work; fine. Thanks, Chzz ► 06:10, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
---
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.