Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yilgarn Iron Producers Association

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 11:18, 16 April 2022 (UTC)

Yilgarn Iron Producers Association

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Yilgarn Iron Producers Association (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

more appropriate to be merged into the history section of the Railways in the Pilbara article as it was a loose association relative to planning rail access - and had neglible success in changing the way the mining companies developed their own networks JarrahTree 08:07, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. JarrahTree 08:13, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Companies, and Transportation. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:31, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

• Merge into Railways in the Pilbara. Insufficient coverage for a stand-alone article but definitely worth a mention in the context of the long-running iron ore railway usage dispute. Calistemon (talk) 09:11, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
• Speedy keep WP:SKCRIT#1 Absence of delete rationale. Thincat (talk) 15:51, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

  Comment WP:SKCRIT#1 requires that no new delete rationale appears in the deletion discussion - in this case (and subsequent to Thincat’s edit) new rationales have appeared. Springnuts (talk) 18:39, 3 April 2022 (UTC)

• Delete Fails WP:ORG. Could not find significant coverage. LibStar (talk) 23:42, 30 March 2022 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:09, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

• Delete - not seeing anything like significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. Springnuts (talk) 12:01, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
• Delete Topic fails our NCORP criteria for establishing notability. I can understand why someone might mention the topic in Railways in the Pilbara but that wouldn't be a "merge". HighKing⁺⁺ 11:25, 7 April 2022 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 06:50, 9 April 2022 (UTC)

• Delete, insufficient WP:SIGCOV that would satisfy notability criteria. Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 08:40, 16 April 2022 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.