Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Xerneas and Yveltal

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of generation VI Pokémon. Content can be merged from history. Sandstein 10:34, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

Xerneas and Yveltal

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Xerneas and Yveltal (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable pair of legendary Pokemon, no SIGCOV.

Alternative to deletion is redirecting to the list article List of generation VI Pokémon, as it is similar to other Pokemon AfDs (here here here). Natg 19 (talk) 00:59, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Natg 19 (talk) 00:59, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Natg 19 (talk) 00:59, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. Natg 19 (talk) 00:59, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

• Delete/Redirect Impressively referenced, but basically a WP:REFBOMB. Lacks the amount of WP:SIGCOV to demonstrate notability._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 08:14, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
• Redirect to List of generation VI Pokémon per nominator. Notability issues have been raised as early as 2019 on the talk page and in the the GA review. Link20XX (talk) 15:08, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
• (Author) Redirect/merge – No qualms with this article being merged into the broader Gen VI list since it fails notability requirements. ~ Cyclonebiskit (chat) 15:52, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
• Delete. Non-notable, and not a likely search result. - Bryn (talk) (contributions) 22:23, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
• Merge and redirect to List of generation VI Pokémon The target has a notes column that can absorb the reception. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 06:53, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
• Merge and redirect, as others have said. No SIGCOF, mostly trivial/passing references to the actual subject. They're about Pokémon broadly, not these specific Pokémon in any meaningful way. — ImaginesTigers (talk∙contribs) 23:52, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
• Merge and redirect Not enough significant coverage outside of the other gen 6 pokemon.Jackattack1597 (talk) 10:33, 28 June 2021 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.