Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William Douglas Campbell

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Uranium One#Congressional investigation. Randykitty (talk) 18:14, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

William Douglas Campbell

William Douglas Campbell (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

BLP1E. Named in an FBI statement about a political scandal, with no other information. power~enwiki (π, ν) 03:41, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 03:44, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 03:44, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 03:44, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

Keep WP:BLP1E requires fulfilling all 3 conditions, not just the first. The other two clearly are not fulfilled:

• 2 "person otherwise remains, and is likely to remain, a low-profile individual"
• 3 "the event is not significant or the individual's role was either not substantial or not well documented"

This is a significant event and the individual's role is well-documented and substantial. He is not a low-profile individual because of how significant the Clinton Foundation–State Department controversy is. I believe my creation of the page Feb 13 was justified. ScratchMarshall (talk) 05:56, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

• redirect to Uranium One#Congressional investigation which is where everything there is to say about him is already said, in a single short sentence and with the context that is needed to make sense of this. Mangoe (talk) 13:42, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.