Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikeo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mailer Diablo 02:57, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

Wikeo

I can't find any notable sources in the article. FurryiamIAM 18:02, 23 July 2006 (UTC) To explain better: it fails notable (WP:WEB), WP:V, and WP:NOR. Basically wikipedia does not keep articles just because they have a website. Wikipedia requires a second party source like a newspaper article (please see those guideline links, it has to fullfill them). FurryiamIAM 19:22, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. Non-notable (WP:WEB), website it discusses doesn't even look like it's running yet, and not in English. Neil916 21:43, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment. Since when was being in English a criteria for notability?--ThreeAnswers 16:36, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
    • Response. It's not. That comment was due to my mis-recalling WP:MOS-L, which has to do with external links, not articles, and doesn't apply in this case, anyway. Thank you for pointing out that mistake. Neil916 18:04, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Has no claim to notability. Picaroon9288 22:59, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Not notable. S0uj1r0 23:28, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Per others before me. Anomo 15:41, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

Tip to nominator : Consider using the proposed deletion process for uncontroversial deletions, such as this one. Thanks! - Mailer Diablo 02:57, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.