Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Web Automation Markup Language
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. joe deckertalk 03:37, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
- Web Automation Markup Language (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article does not appear to be about a notable topic. I have searched for sources, and all I can find is the GitHub page of the project itself (which is also the only reference used in the article). Yadáyiⁿga (talk) 05:51, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2016 September 21. —cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 06:08, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
- Delete This language seems to be a fork of the already borderline relevant Automation Markup Language and is apparently yet another XML derivation of which many exists. It is very recent, the first contributions to github started this January. There is 0 reception of this markup-language to be found, Google has 20 results, all of them repositories. Currently it sits at version 0.2. Has been created by a single purpose account. It therefore fails WP:GNG and specifically relatable SNG like WP:WEB and/or WP:WP:NSOFTWARE. Dead Mary (talk) 07:33, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:06, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
- Delete – No coverage found in reliable sources; fails WP:N. North America1000 00:13, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.