Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WR Entertainment

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was No consensus. Beeblebrox (talk) 06:27, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WR Entertainment (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Although the company is listed on a stock exchange, I could not seem to find enough coverage specifically about the company; at most, what I found were brief mentions in articles, as well as company profiles and promotional material. Narutolovehinata5 t ccsdnew 04:54, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
-- What is this complaint really about? Please be aware that this page was just created and that it will be completed with further information. Besides the obvious fact that the company is listed on the stock exchange with the ticker [WRE-ME], which is a big indicator of creditbility, there are several news articles on the company throughout the past 7 years since incorporation in 2009, some of which are: Nettavisen Dec 2, 2016, E24 Nov 15,2016, Dagens Næringsliv Jan 11, 2016. — Preceding unsigned comment added by C Lunde (talkcontribs) 05:51, December 7, 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 04:55, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 04:55, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 04:55, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 08:48, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:38, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - being listed on a Stock exchange isn't considered a good measure of notability as it has been alleged above by another editor. Bilbo Baggins (talk) 09:45, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Apparent Norwegian-language sources enough to establish notability (assuming Google Translate isn't totally off its rocker). Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 02:07, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.