Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vince Burgio
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. Liz Read! Talk! 19:03, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Vince Burgio (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:BIO without significant independent coverage. User:Namiba 20:24, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Games, and California. User:Namiba 20:24, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
- Keep per WP:GNG. Notable senior poker player and writer (columnist for CardPlayer Magazine and author of to books on poker). Article cited zero sources at the time of nomination, but have now added a few of the many articles about him available in ProQuest, Newspapers.com and the Internet Archive. Yes, some of the coverage quotes him, but there is plenty of factual coverage about him as well. (Still trying to decide whether the two Scott Buono reviews of his two books are OK to cite, but regardless, Burgio is notable and the article should continue to be improved.) Cielquiparle (talk) 03:26, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:24, 21 November 2023 (UTC)Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 21:01, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 17:51, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
- Keep -- The sources ALREADY IN THE ARTICLE are sufficient to meet GNG.Central and Adams (talk) 17:34, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.