Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vanajan Joanna

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to Kaari Utrio. (non-admin closure) asilvering (talk) 02:36, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Vanajan Joanna (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I couldn't establish that this meets WP:NBOOK / WP:GNG. A possible WP:ATD is merge/redirect to Kaari Utrio, but as this has no sourced information, I am not sure it should be merged. Boleyn (talk) 18:53, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 17:49, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Redirect to Kaari Utrio: Does not meet WP:NBOOK or GNG. Essentially no coverage about the book at all, which probably explains why the article is completely unreferenced. There isn't really anything to merge. C F A 💬 23:51, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete although I suppose a redirect wouldn't hurt. All I found were sales sites (in Finnish). If there are reviews they would be in Finnish newspapers and journals and I would not be able to locate or search those. I note that there are other books in the list in Kaari Utrio that also have no sources and virtually no content, e.g. Porvarin morsian. It looks like a bit of cleanup is needed. Lamona (talk) 01:17, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to Kaari Utrio as and alternative to deletion. I can't find any meaningful coverage from online searches, or the NLF historical newspaper archive: only a couple of passing mentions where the book is included in some list or another without any additional commentary. There might be something in offline sources (and the 90s is a bit tricky w/r/t archive access due to copyright stuff), but hypothetical sources don't count. -Ljleppan (talk) 14:39, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.