Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tuscan Identity

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Star Mississippi 02:17, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

Tuscan Identity

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Tuscan Identity (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An unknown party, on the web there is only some news about its foundation and nothing more. It does not appear to have participated in any elections. The page, written in two lines, at present does not demonstrate the relevance of the party and is decidedly useless. Scia Della Cometa (talk) 13:24, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Politics, and Italy. Shellwood (talk) 13:26, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

• Keep. Tuscan Identity, formed by a breakaway group of Lega Toscana, was represented for some time in Tuscany's Regional Council and, as such, it is definitely encyclopedic. Every little piece of political history deserves a space in Wikipedia. Articles like this (the nominator proposed a string of AfDs today) should be clearly improved, but not deleted. Of course, the passing of time makes difficult to find more sources and information in the web, but I will do my best to improve the article. I think it should be kept, anyway. At first glance I see proposed deletions as harmful and time-wasting exercises, but hopfully they could become opportunities for improving articles. --Checco (talk) 19:48, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

You know very well that the page cannot be improved. Your assessment of keeping this page is not about the relevance of the page itself, but a position based on the principle that everything can stay on wikipedia. But is not so.--Scia Della Cometa (talk) 20:48, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

• Delete a one-line article about a political movement that has no relevance whatsoever, with no evidence of any popular support – composed of one or two people in the regional council of Tuscany. Yakme (talk) 08:11, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
• Delete Topic lacks sigcov and RS. Arguments that it should be exempt from Wikipedia's notability policies just because it was a piece of political history, notable or not, should be reminded of WP:NOTEVERYTHING. Megtetg34 (talk) 06:10, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.