Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Turicato

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep non-admin closed. Gtstricky^{Talk or C} 20:37, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

Turicato

Turicato (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Doesnt cite any sources. It is rittled with grammer errors and doesnt demonstrate importance. Chasecarter (talk) 22:47, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

• Keep - Geographical regions are inherently notable. Caknuck (talk) 23:06, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
• Keep - I believe i can make it look a lot better, but i will need help with sources Sudoku424 (talk) 02:13, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

• Keep - i added a bit and one source, but this will be a project for a couple of people Sudoku424 (talk) 02:33, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

• Keep - All locations are encyclopedic as per WP:OUTCOMES. A rewrite is probably warrented, but AfD is not cleanup. CosmicPenguin (Talk) 05:05, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
• Keep Source verifies existence which is enough for such a geographical location. Davewild (talk) 16:12, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
• Keep - Government districts like this are inherently notable. Source does confirm its existence. --Oakshade (talk) 19:06, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.