Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tropical Storm Sonca (2017)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. I see a consensus to Keep this article and the deletion rationale is weak. If you propose a Merge or Redirect in the future, please supply a link to the target article you are considering. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:23, 27 December 2023 (UTC)

Tropical Storm Sonca (2017)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Tropical Storm Sonca (2017) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Sonca is very empty. It can easily be merged with the season article. Incognito Fedora (talk) 20:06, 14 December 2023 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Environment and Asia. Incognito Fedora (talk) 20:06, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 22:54, 14 December 2023 (UTC)

Strong oppose/keep - Did you even see the impact that the storm caused? Does that not warrant an article?? The only reason you would be nominating it is because of its meteorological history and top section, and even so, you can fix it yourself. luis 💬 13:53, 17 December 2023 (UTC)

Also, this is a deletion discussion. Articles of individual tropical cyclones should not be deleted and should instead be redirected if not notable. Merge discussions of those articles take place on either the parent talk page (being the season which the storm formed during) or the talk page of the article itself. luis 💬 14:02, 17 December 2023 (UTC)

• Keep: news coverage establishes notability. Owen× ☎ 16:42, 18 December 2023 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 23:30, 21 December 2023 (UTC)

• Keep. The article itself might be short but this clearly passes WP:GNG. The storm received wide coverage and the fairly high death toll makes it notable. 🛧Midori No Sora♪🛪 ( ☁＝☁＝✈) 00:52, 22 December 2023 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.