Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Pringle (Royal Navy officer)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete Imperat§ r^(Talk) 02:04, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

Thomas Pringle (Royal Navy officer)

Thomas Pringle (Royal Navy officer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Apparent hoax -- Admiral Thomas Pringle's details don't match the article. http://www.artfact.com/auction-lot/daniel-gardner-c.1750-1805-1-c-xtjk83171j SarekOfVulcan (talk) 22:08, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

• Deleat - there are no ref and dosen't appre to meet the notablitly standerds and I what you person above, I too think it is a Hoax.Fld300b (talk) 22:36, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. —Nick-D (talk) 23:10, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
• The article as it currently stands is untenable; apart from his involvment in theBattle of Vancour, nothing here stands up to scrutiny. However, the subject would be notable and this article might be saved if completely rewritten, whether by an individual or by dint of squadron or lords a leaping. Pringle was created a Baronet in 1766[1], so someone from Wikipedia:WikiProject Peerage and Baronetage might be able to expand the article. Really, he does seem to have had note-worthy career. (Incidentally, he gave his name to Pringle Bay in South Africa.) FlowerpotmaN·(t) 00:28, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.