Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thames Valley Magpies (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 13:02, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

Thames Valley Magpies

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/Thames Valley Magpies
• Articles for deletion/Thames Valley Magpies (2nd nomination)

Thames Valley Magpies (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Last AfD ended in no consensus. As this has been tagged for WP:NOTABILITY for seven years, it's about time it was resolved. I can't see that it meets WP:Notability (sports) or WP:GNG; there are sources but they are not necessarily reliable. There are 2 incoming links which would be potential redirect targets - I would favour AFL Britain rather than Australian rules football in England#London. Pinging those who have examined its notability before: Grahamec, Jenks24, Abcmaxx. Boleyn (talk) 11:56, 30 March 2015 (UTC) Boleyn (talk) 11:56, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:55, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:55, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:55, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 00:44, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 04:29, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

• Note to closer Can I ask that as this has been tagged for notability for 7 years, that it is relisted again (if no clear consensus has emerged) rather than close as no consensus based mainly on poor participation? Boleyn (talk) 07:00, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein  19:13, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

• Delete - Non-notable Australian rules football team, now defunct, formerly located in England, for lack of significant coverage in multiple, independent, reliable sources per WP:GNG and WP:ORG. Long overdue for a house-cleaning. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 20:01, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
• Delete - there's mentions of them, but no significant coverage. Paulbrock (talk) 11:10, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
• Redirect to AFL Britain. No significant coverage, but could be a search term. The-Pope (talk) 14:58, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.