Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TestBird

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 20:34, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

TestBird

TestBird (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD by article creator. Non-notable product. I cannot find WP:RSes that meet WP:GNG or any other notability criteria. Product shares a name with another product for GIS software. I see a number of sources in Chinese but cannot determine if they are RSes or not. Possibly a case of WP:TOOSOON. Walter Görlitz (talk) 14:57, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

• Delete for now, at least. It's a two-year old startup that is esentially advertising its product. Also could not find WP:RS. The two listed refs are poor quality commercial publications. New Media Theorist (talk) 15:18, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 15:40, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

• Delete. Promotional article about a non-notable product. MER-C 05:43, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 17:29, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:30, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:30, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

• Delete as my searches found nothing better than this and a few of the currently listed links at browser thus no better improvement. SwisterTwister talk 05:43, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.