Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/T.T. Quick
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. (WP:NPASR). (Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica1000 06:00, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
- T.T. Quick (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
To this band's benefit, they were mostly active in the 80s, before the internet really took off. So I doubt there will be many reliable sources available online to judge this band's notability. There doesn't seem to be any coverage in a Google News archive search. It does look like they were signed with Megaforce Records and released 1 EP and 1 album on that label, but without any significant coverage to back it up, and without any records that charted nationally, I am not convinced of the band's notability. Note that the Megaforce Records article does not mention TT Quick at all. Does an EP count as an album? If not, then I don't see any of the criteria at WP:BAND satisfied. Mz7 (talk) 20:40, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 21:03, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
- Merge selectively to Mark Tornillo, the former lead singer, who seems to have a better case for notability. I don't really find much for T.T. Quick, but happy to look again if anyone can provide substantial coverage from independent reliable sources --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 00:44, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:37, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 02:19, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 02:46, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.