Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Strike Suit Zero
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was a soft No consensus. There was a nomination for deletion and a single editor contesting that proposition; as there were no previously contested PRODs, this is basically the equivalent of a single contested PROD. NPASR. Salvidrim! 09:11, 26 December 2012 (UTC) (non-admin closure)[reply]
- Strike Suit Zero (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
WP:TOOSOON a pending video game with no references. Fails WP:GNG MJH (talk) 02:55, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong keep There is plenty of news in reliable sources about this game so it is not too soon and it meets the GNG. --Odie5533 (talk) 13:52, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- could you link to some of the news coverage?--199.91.207.3 (talk) 21:20, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Strike Suit Zero#Further_reading --Odie5533 (talk) 22:07, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- could you link to some of the news coverage?--199.91.207.3 (talk) 21:20, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 15:17, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:17, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, Riley 00:09, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mediran (t • c) 00:31, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.