Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephen R. Lawhead

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. North America1000 17:13, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Stephen R. Lawhead (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to fail WP:NAUTHOR, and I'm not convinced they pass WP:GNG either. In any case, most of the article is unsourced, so not complient with WP:BLP. A lot of the coverage on Google is generic or identical author profiles, as well as book lists etc. Mdann52 (talk) 16:04, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is my first time commenting like this, so I apologize if my formatting is incorrect. I'm confused as to why this author fails those tests. I understand the sourcing problem, so I've found a few sources to add (if they are the ones you find missing):
I don't know if those the things you're looking for, but I am surprised that this article would be singled out for deletion. Jason Scott (talk) 04:47, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:27, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:27, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:27, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:27, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep: Doesn't seem to fail WP:NAUTHOR to me. I mean his books have been "the subject of an independent book or feature-length film, or of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews." Also, he won a Gold Medallion for Fiction award in 1998 for one of his books, so I'm assuming that the books are well-known. SilverSurfingSerpant (talk) 22:01, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • @SilverSurfingSerpant: The article claims this, but I've been unable to find anything to back it up - with unsourced statements on awards, we have to assume they don't exist. Secondly, I don't understand the use of the quote - I can find no film referenced based on the books, or a book written on the book. Mdann52 (talk) 20:49, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I'm changing my vote to Delete for now. SilverSurfingSerpent (talk) 21:15, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • I submitted the reference for the award higher up--the Gold Medallion award is now known as the Evangelical Christian Publisher's Association Award (10 seconds of Google told me this). Jason Scott (talk) 23:14, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.