Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephanie Johnson
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
 | This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2010 June 11. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to Minor characters of Days of our Lives. Sourcing concerns prevail, but those sources are probably good enough for a mention in the list article. Shimeru (talk) 22:41, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Stephanie Johnson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A rather massive article without any sources about a minor character in the soap opera days of our lives that has persisted for a vast amount of time. No reliable sources treat this fictional thing in the sort of depth that would allow for, or argue in favor of, having it treated in an encyclopedia. There is also no way to verify its accuracy through reliable independent sources. Bali ultimate (talk) 00:31, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge I would suggest this article be merged with Minor characters of Days of our Lives. I already attempted to move the information to child characters, but someone reverted it. My suggestion would be to merge it. Melanie has more notability than Stephanie. Sami50421 (talk) 00:43, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
In fact I could do it myself. If you'd like.Sami50421 (talk) 00:47, 20 May 2010 (UTC) comment was removed by user. — Jack Merridew 02:50, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]- Please don't do that during this discussion; it's disruptive; see:
- Wikipedia:Guide to deletion#You may edit the article during the discussion
Specifically, the fifth bullet point
- Wikipedia:Guide to deletion#You may edit the article during the discussion
- Cheers, Jack Merridew 01:19, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Please don't do that during this discussion; it's disruptive; see:
- Delete as an unsourced and non-notable article. This sort of thing is better suited to fan-wikis such as on wikia.com. I expect it to be transwiki'd ASAP, so we'll be free of it. Sincerely, Jack Merridew 01:19, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. -- Jack Merridew 01:19, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge As Jack said it is deemed not notable, as Sami suggested merge with Minor characters of Days of our Lives. Gabriela Hernandez 02:31, 20 May 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gabi Hernandez (talk • contribs)
- Note: This article has been transwiki'd to annex.wikia.com -- Jack Merridew 18:23, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Hardly a minor character, the character is a Brady, one of the core members of the show, as well the child of one of the show's super couples. If this article is deleted because of sourcing issues, then almost every Days article should be deleted as well. Rather than try to think of ways to remove these articles, we should try to improve them by adding sources. Agree that sourcing is a problem. Rm994 (talk) 02:40, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep I fixed the problems with the article. No need for deletion now. Sami50421 (talk) 01:13, 22 May 2010 (UTC)— Sami50421 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
- Delete or Merge - All the refs are for the actors, not the character. No indication that the character has any real-world notability. 76.102.27.141 (talk) 01:23, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Primary source, unsuitable for notability purposes. 76.102.27.141 (talk) 01:35, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Article has been fixed as I can see. A lot of problems with it, have been fixed. 75.69.115.225 (talk) 02:16, 22 May 2010 (UTC) — 75.69.115.225 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.