Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Society of Dark Lily
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Tip to nominator : Consider using the proposed deletion process for uncontroversial deletions, such as this one. Thanks! - Mailer Diablo 09:24, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mailer Diablo 09:24, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
This appears to fail everything, including WP:NOT, WP:VAIN and WP:NPOV, unreferenced, unnotable, there is a webpage, but... that shouldn't save it from Delete--Richhoncho 10:32, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - nothing this thoroughly bizarre to read should be saved from this fate. BigHaz 10:54, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
- Strong delete, fails pretty much everything except Wikipedia:No climbing the Reichstag dressed as Spider-Man. --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 11:30, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete or possibly speedy as patent nonsense. It would take a lot of work to fix this up. --Sbluen 12:34, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete Fails WP:NN, WP:NPOV, WP:NOT, WP:VAIN etc. Should not be clogging up article space any longer than it has to. Thε Halo Θ 12:43, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:NPOV and WP:VAIN and WP:V. Potentially could be salvaged if verifiable sources can prove this is actually notable. Even then, this article would require cleanup, wikification, and editing to remove WP:NPOV. In its current incarnation, delete it! Allisonmontgomery69 15:47, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy delete. I don't see that being a Satanic group and having a journal asserts a whole lot of notability. —C.Fred (talk) 20:23, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per above, with 76 exact results from Google. --Slgr@ndson (page - messages - contribs) 20:33, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
Tip to nominator : Consider using the proposed deletion process for uncontroversial deletions, such as this one. Thanks! - Mailer Diablo 09:24, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.